ska invita
back on the other side
then what would that mean do you think?I guess that view is based on the likely nearness of the vote - if the yes's loose by only a coupel of percent...
then what would that mean do you think?I guess that view is based on the likely nearness of the vote - if the yes's loose by only a coupel of percent...
knowing nothing I've just glanced at White & Case. They don't have offices in every European capital. Or in Scotland. So even if they are better placed than a proper diplomatic service (doubtful, their people are presumably busy already) they can't hit the ground running either.
not being butchers I'll take your word for it, but I'll also guess that such superstars have pretty full diaries already and their existing clients might be a bit miffed if they wander off to Edinburgh.They're good, very good indeed.
They have Ian Forrester QC as a partner. He is an exceptional lawyer. Also, interestingly, he is qualified in Scotland, England and Wales, Brussels, and New York.
They also have some other outstanding lawyers, including James Killick, who is a genuinely intimidating guy to deal with.
not being butchers I'll take your word for it, but I'll also guess that such superstars have pretty full diaries already and their existing clients might be a bit miffed if they wander off to Edinburgh.
do you realise how ridiculous you look Diamond?
but you aren't are you? You're just reeling off a list of names that mean nothing to anyone here, and adds nothing to the discussion, other than a display of your testicles (or googling prowess, I neither know nor care which)Yeah, fuck it.
I do a ridiculous job that requires me to work insane hours most of the time - it's nice to get an opportunity to talk about it a bit in a relevant situation...
but you aren't are you? You're just reeling off a list of names that mean nothing to anyone here, and adds nothing to the discussion, other than a display of your testicles (or googling prowess, I neither know nor care which)
talking about it in a relevant situation. It isn't relevant.Aren't doing what precisely?
My answer to that question would be "No". The Union was formed for the purpose of establishing an empire and that empire is now nothing but a collection of bones. It's time to move on. I was watching Newsnight on Tuesday night and was horrified to hear Emily Maitlis ask the audience "What are the good things about the Empire" or words to that effect. The general tone coming from the audience was the Empire was a force for good.Can great Britain survive a Scottish no vote:
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/can-great-britain-survive-scottish-vote
If there is a "yes" vote I anticipate a massive parallel progressive movement for northern devolution.
I think you're being ridiculous. Constituencies are pretty much allocated by population. i'd love to see some form of regional attack on the centres of power - but a) this isn't it and b) you wishing something to happen doesn't mean it will happen. There is no support for this stuff right now - what there is is majority opposition to Scottish independence (not on an anti-scottish basis). Out of the bubble!
Do you not think that this referendum has significantly increased potential support for a 'federal Britain'?So new Labour's attempts at regionalisation of powers post-Scottish devolution, and the civic apathy toward it, completely passed you by, then?
So the orkney islands might want independence from Scotland if it's a yes vote. LOL.
Then there's Shetland....and why not? the orkneys have a good argument for independence, mostly they don't consider themselves scottish but orcadian. why shouldn't they?
So the orkney islands might want independence from Scotland if it's a yes vote. LOL.
Yep, that's my guess, too. A narrow 'no' could be a good catalyst for change across the UK.Do you not think that this referendum has significantly increased potential support for a 'federal Britain'?
However I think that a Yes vote would more likely be the end of that, rather than the catalyst. A No vote and Devo Max would lead to more of 'why can't we have that', but independence is enough of a disconnect to make people give up on the idea.
Nicely put, but separation WILL create barriers between likeminded people that weren't there before. To me that is a shame.
i don't know about shetlend tbh, i've not been there and spoken to people like i recently have in orkney.
What do I know having spent the last few years working in the EU law departments of various city law firms...
The Frissons.
Can you tell me why no precedent def means no state could be allowed to stay in please? Why on earth would no precedent existing mean that none could be set? Each time you say there is no precedent you make the case that actually there are many potential outcomes here rather than your one - only one!!!! ONLY ONE!!!!!!