Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

House price crash

That graph is indexed from 1970, which is why it looks so weird. Most of the divergence happens pre-2000 though. If you redrew it only showing the last 25 years, the UK wouldn’t look dissimilar to the other countries.

For example, this is the UK compared with some other countries during the decade to 2021:
yeah but a 100% increase an relatively cheap is still less than 50% increase on already extortionate
 
House prices in England have gone up 28% just since Covid, which is just insane by any measure, as is thinking that rise will stay there imo.

I'd treat figures like this with some scepticism. Is that the start or end of covid?

I keep an eye on property prices in several areas and everything has come down over the last 6 months, sometimes significantly. What's happening a lot less is people trying to sell for ridiculous prices. It used to be the case where you'd see a property come on to the market at 20-30% over where it should be and it stuck out like a sore thumb. Owners chancing their arms basically to see if they got a bite. That's stopped happening and things are being more sensibly priced generally but it's still not selling quickly and further reductions in 5-10% increments are commonplace.
 
I can't see a massive drop in house prices myself (long overdue though I think it is). A lot of the house prices in recent years has been fueled by near free credit. That's over now so prices are starting to come down steadily but as they do people who were previously priced out are going to start finding houses are affordable so that will shore prices up again.
A truly massive drop is going to need a truly massive crisis and whilst times are hard for many at the moment we're not talking Great Depression. The people most likely to loose out over the coming year or two are going to be renters. The general opinion amongst landlords seems to be that they're not getting much love at the moment and the number is falling as they pull out reducing the amount of rented housing stock in a market where demand already exceeds supply. I know the plight of landlords is going to get most Urbs reaching for their violins but even with falling house prices, the effect of falling rental properties will cascade downwards pushing renters at the very bottom out as those at the very top grab the property ladder from above.
There are just not enough houses period and an even greater paucity of social housing. Not much is happening to resolve the first and nothing whatsoever to resolve the second.
 
People have been saying there's going to be a crash for decades now and yet... Supply and demand. Landlords may well be selling (oh no!) but there are still many many people waiting to buy. And all the wealth tied up in 'boomer' properties is still sat waiting to be released to the next generation. And so it continues...
 
yeah but a 100% increase an relatively cheap is still less than 50% increase on already extortionate
You literally can’t compare prices now to 1970 or 1980. The change in everything related makes it irrelevant. Just one example of many: the liberalisation of banking in the 1980s meant that people could borrow at much higher multiples than previously. Since house prices are determined by available credit, that just multiplied up the price of a house. That effect won’t reverse unless they go back to much tighter restrictions on lending multiples again.

You can make at least some level of comparisons over the post-2000s, wherein at least interest rates have never been crazy high and the banking system hasn’t been completely overhauled (much as it needed to post-2008). And over that period, the UK has been consistent with other nations, and rises have been somewhere between bond yields and equity returns. The latter should be irrelevant but it isn’t, because UK people see property as an investment
 
You literally can’t compare prices now to 1970 or 1980. The change in everything related makes it irrelevant. Just one example of many: the liberalisation of banking in the 1980s meant that people could borrow at much higher multiples than previously. Since house prices are determined by available credit, that just multiplied up the price of a house. That effect won’t reverse unless they go back to much tighter restrictions on lending multiples again.

You can make at least some level of comparisons over the post-2000s, wherein at least interest rates have never been crazy high and the banking system hasn’t been completely overhauled (much as it needed to post-2008). And over that period, the UK has been consistent with other nations, and rises have been somewhere between bond yields and equity returns. The latter should be irrelevant but it isn’t, because UK people see property as an investment

The best stat is average house price to average wage ratio. Bottom line is you can buy a chateaux in France for cheap, ive seen it on tv
 
The best stat is average house price to average wage ratio.
It’s not, though. Why reify that measure? It’s not a physical law.
Bottom line is you can buy a chateaux in France for cheap, ive seen it on tv
It’s not cheap if you can’t borrow to get it. French maximum multiples are roughly three times income AFTER expenses (including their equivalent of council tax). That’s what I’m saying — prices depends on the availability of credit
 
Average wage to house price, other cost of living changes, interest rates, lending criteria changes and supply changes - all of those together give a good indication of the general house price trend. However it doesn't get much more inelastic than housing demand.
 
It’s not, though. Why reify that measure? It’s not a physical law.

It’s not cheap if you can’t borrow to get it. French maximum multiples are roughly three times income AFTER expenses (including their equivalent of council tax). That’s what I’m saying — prices depends on the availability of credit

Surely, it’s the only or one of the only metrics to consider when looking at property affordability. The borrow to earnings ratio multiple is insane.
Debt equals violence. David Greaver and all that.
 
Surely, it’s the only or one of the only metrics to consider when looking at property affordability. The borrow to earnings ratio multiple is insane.
Debt equals violence. David Greaver and all that.
It’s an odd way to look at affordability, to use a clumsy proxy. If you want to look at affordability then look at affordability — what are your monthly housing costs as a % of your monthly income? That particular stat hasn’t changed much over the years. More than anything else, it defines rents. And a house price can be calculated in terms of fundamentals if you know its rental yield and the risk-free yield curve.

Don’t get me wrong — I’m not saying that average house prices to average wage is irrelevant. It’s an important measure. It’s just not the only one that matters, or even the most important.
 
It’s not, though. Why reify that measure? It’s not a physical law.

It’s not cheap if you can’t borrow to get it. French maximum multiples are roughly three times income AFTER expenses (including their equivalent of council tax). That’s what I’m saying — prices depends on the availability of credit
Does this mean in France they have completely different laws to us about how much banks are allowed to lend people for their motrtgages and that lending limit has kept house prices low ?
 
Does this mean in France they have completely different laws to us about how much banks are allowed to lend people for their motrtgages and that lending limit has kept house prices low ?
That’s right. We used to have completely different laws too. Thatcher gave the banks licence to lend much more based on the same joint income.
 
Im curious about what the impact is of this sort of info being shared widely (guardian today):
D5DC4DD3-1BC4-41C5-9724-C7E9278833E1.jpeg
I mean the more people get told that any house they buy now will not increase in value at all for years, will drop instead, that knowledge will have significant effects on people’s buying behaviour won’t it.
 
Im curious about what the impact is of this sort of info being shared widely (guardian today):
View attachment 364782
I mean the more people get told that any house they buy now will not increase in value at all for years, will drop instead, that knowledge will have significant effects on people’s buying behaviour won’t it.

Where is that quote from?
 
Im curious about what the impact is of this sort of info being shared widely (guardian today):
View attachment 364782
I mean the more people get told that any house they buy now will not increase in value at all for years, will drop instead, that knowledge will have significant effects on people’s buying behaviour won’t it.
If any house ie a drop across the board then I don’t see why. If they want a house to live in then its value once you’re in doesn’t matter too much.
 
Just if you’re thinking that what you buy will be worth less next year, you’ll not be wanting to pay more for it today than it’ll be worth next year.
 

That’s the view of the head of price research for Savills, rather than Savills marketing department, so it’s just an honest piece. The journo asked questions and they gave answers.

It may well have the effect that you suggest on some buyers but the guy has taken the line of giving an accurate picture rather than attempting to support the housing market.
 
yep, but i think its becoming common knowledge now that yr house value is not going up for the foreseeable, haven't seen anyone claim otherwise they just disagree on the extent of the drop. Thats a really different market to the one we've grown used to.
 
Just if you’re thinking that what you buy will be worth less next year, you’ll not be wanting to pay more for it today than it’ll be worth next year.
I'm broadly in agreement, but you only have to talk to a few (potential) house buyers to hear things like "sure, it might go down, but I'm not planning on moving soon, and it will recover". And, largely, they've been right, depending on how long-term their thinking was.

But what would I know? I bought both the properties I used to own at the bottom of the market. 🤷‍♂️
 
yep, but i think its becoming common knowledge now that yr house value is not going up for the foreseeable, haven't seen anyone claim otherwise they just disagree on the extent of the drop. Thats a really different market to the one we've grown used to.

I agree with you. I think you’d be an idiot to buy a house right now but the fact is, people are still buying them. As existentialist says, if you’re buying the property as a home rather than an investment and don’t need a big mortgage, short term price drops aren’t going to be a huge concern.
 
i'm not saying people won't buy houses. Just think they'll make low offers, based on their reckons, and that's a very different world to how its been the last many years.

It’s also possible that so many first-timers who have been frustrated for years by the prices will jump in at the same time and this will ramp up the bargaining.
 
Back
Top Bottom