krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Christians were fucking up the countries before the banks.To the World Bank?
They brought homophobia to the continent.
What's your point here?
Christians were fucking up the countries before the banks.To the World Bank?
What's your point here?
And I then speculated as to the reasons why the institutional embodiments of global capital are campaigning to impose LGBTQI+ identity on Africa by force. They only ever act out of self interest, so what do they get out of it?
How can being gay/transgender etc be "imposed" on a wealth of cultures who have lived it for generations upon generations?I argued that that the World Bank and the IMF must change their policy of withdrawing "loans" or "aid" from nations such as Uganda and Ghana, whenever those nations pass laws prohibiting LGBTQI+ identities.
I also posited that the counter-productive nature of such policies is so obvious that it must be deliberate.
And I then speculated as to the reasons why the institutional embodiments of global capital are campaigning to impose LGBTQI+ identity on Africa by force. They only ever act out of self interest, so what do they get out of it?
The implication seems to be that gay people would have it just fine and dandy in African countries where they're persecuted, if they would only just be gay in traditional African ways and not actually call themselves gay in a Eurocentric way.
Is it NATO’s fault again?
attempting to export its own degraded model of sexuality
It's been pointed out to you that there's been gay and transgender people in Africa forever.There would be no "gay people" in Africa without Western intervention, and there would be no homophobia either. The West is attempting to export its own degraded model of sexuality onto Africa, and it is using brute financial force in order to do so.
It's been pointed out to you that there's been gay and transgender people in Africa forever.
The only racist here is you.You don't understand. "Gay" and "transgender" are Western categories, which are being forcibly imposed on Africa.
What you mean is that there have always been same-sex relationships and cross dressing in Africa. But it's racist to attempt to translate African sexuality into Western terms, and that is exactly what you're doing (albeit out of ignorance and stupidity rather than malice).
But apparently it doesn't behoove you to answer what possible interest banks, or indeed anyone else, could have in 'remolding African sexuality', even if this were possible. So you're just trolling.So it behooves us to ask why they are so determined to remold African sexuality on a Western model.
Unlike you however, the IMF and the World Bank are far from stupid. So it behooves us to ask why they are so determined to remold African sexuality on a Western model.
But apparently it doesn't behoove you to answer what possible interest banks, or indeed anyone else, could have in 'remolding African sexuality', even if this were possible. So you're just trolling.
Anyone who could infer that particular conclusion is either deliberately trolling or out where the buses don't run. I have not yet worked out which applies to you. Of course, both could be true.So I'd say it's pretty easy to infer what "Kusi" wants to do to the people of Ghana--deprive them of their representative government and replace it with the World Bank, which "Kusi" presumably regards as more rational and capable of clearer thought than the Ghanian people on any number of subjects.
That's ridiculous. He is simply saying that homophobic Ghanaians pursue a united agenda in a way that liberals. moderates or what have you don't.Tbh I thought you might be able to work it out for yourself. It's not difficult to see the motivation at work here. From today's Guardian:
"“The only thing that unites Ghanians, no matter what political party, or religion, is homophobia,” Kusi says. “Homophobia makes it really hard for people to think clearly. It obstructs your reasoning.”
‘My cast and crew’s safety kept me up at night’: why a queer Ghanaian film may never be screened
Joewackle J Kusi was finishing his film Nyame Mma when an anti-LGBTQ+ bill was passed, bringing the threat of prosecution for those ‘promoting’ queer storieswww.theguardian.com
So according to "Kusi," all Ghanians are homophobes, and all homophobes are irrational and incapable of thinking clearly. So I'd say it's pretty easy to infer what "Kusi" wants to do to the people of Ghana--deprive them of their representative government and replace it with the World Bank, which "Kusi" presumably regards as more rational and capable of clearer thought than the Ghanian people on any number of subjects.
I might rail about people who have been led into stupidity in the UK, or in the US, or indeed elsewhere, for that matter, whether that stupidity is homophobia or racism or anything else. But it doesn't mean I want to deprive them of their representative government, let alone replace it with the World Bank, of all things. You might as well say Kusi is dreaming of replacing the government with aliens from the planet Zog. It's hard to believe that anyone could say this sort of thing seriously.
Give a proper link please.Because the World Bank and the IMF would obviously never attempt to interfere in issues affecting Ghanian sexuality. That's none of their business, is it? Why would they care about encouraging homosexuality in Ghana? Haha no-one can take this sort of thing seriously, haha how amusing it all is. Oh, hang on....
Subscribe to read
www.ft.com
Give a proper link please.
Its says neither the World Bank nor the IMF said anything.What's wrong with the FT? But alright then: Ghanaian anti-LGBTQ law could see loss of $3.8bn from World Bank
What's wrong with the FT?
Because the World Bank and the IMF would obviously never attempt to interfere in issues affecting Ghanian sexuality. That's none of their business, is it? Why would they care about encouraging homosexuality in Ghana? Does "Kusi" look like a World Bank spokesman to you? Haha no-one can take this sort of thing seriously, haha how amusing it all is. Oh, hang on....
Subscribe to read
www.ft.com
So let me get this straight, if that's the word: by magically influencing some Ghanains to adopt 'Western sexuality', the World Bank is hoping to get the silent majority of straight Ghanaians to implement harsh measures that allow them to witdraw funding? Thus causing the corrupted sexuality brigade to deliver the country, equally magically, into their hands?
why do they believe--evidently very strongly--that they will profit from the legalization of non-procreative sexualities throughout sub-Saharan Africa?