Originally written by Wikipedia
Imperialism is a policy of extending control or authority over foreign entities as a means of acquisition and/or maintenance of empires, either through direct territorial conquest or through indirect methods of exerting control on the politics and/or economy of other countries. The term is often used to describe the policy of a country in maintaining colonies and dominance over distant lands, regardless of whether the country calls itself an empire.
Insofar as 'imperialism' might be used to refer to an intellectual position, it would imply the belief that the acquisition and maintenance of empires is a positive good, probably combined with an assumption of cultural or other such superiority inherent to imperial power. See The White Man's Burden.
Imperialism draws heavy criticism on the grounds that historically it has been frequently employed for economic exploitation in which the imperialist power makes use of other countries as sources of raw materials and cheap labor, shaping their economies to suit its own interests and keeping their people in poverty. When imperialism is accompanied by overt military conquest, it is also seen as a violation of freedom and human rights.
In recent years, there has also been a trend to criticise imperialism not at an economic or political level, but at a simply cultural level, particularly the widespread global influence of American culture - see cultural imperialism. Some dispute this extension, however, on the grounds that it is highly subjective (to differentiate between mutual interaction and undue influence) and also applied selectively (hamburgers being imperialist and black tea not). The debate continues.
innit said:Am I the only person who didn't think it was a very good letter? Maybe as a man, Hatboy can't appreciate that women might actually feel threatened or frightened by being approached by men lurking in the shadows late at night, rather than inconvenienced. I also think it is rather moot to claim that 'professionals' would be the only people who might rather not be offered drugs on the street. He seems to conflate the issues of street dealing and St Agnes Place very conveniently... personally I don't think that arresting street drug dealers is an assault on difference or diversity (Political Correctness gone mad? )
This was something that I pointed out to him quite a while ago actually. He's a tall man with a deep voice and didn't really grasp that a woman can be both intimidated and indeed actively harrassed by a lot of the dealers, as indeed I have been, as have my children. I think he thought it was down to my attitude and unwillingness to engage.innit said:Am I the only person who didn't think it was a very good letter? Maybe as a man, Hatboy can't appreciate that women might actually feel threatened or frightened by being approached by men lurking in the shadows late at night, rather than inconvenienced.
Ms T said:I agree. And there are plenty of people on the boards who are far from being NIMBYs or "yuppies" who are saying that the drug dealing problem is out of control at the moment.
tarannau said:To be fair, there are also plenty of people who don't think that the problem has escalated that much - in many ways, on the side streets at least, it's much the same crews that I've seen for many, many years in the same place. Which is perhaps why I objected so strongly to ERG's and the anti Brighton Terrace centre folks for their near hysterical hyperbole about the sutuation. Guff like there's now a needle disposal box, so our kids aren't safe any more...
The exception, for me at least, is the centre, where those annoying whistling tossers seem to be growing ever more prominent and blatant. And to be honest those guys aren't exactly lurking in the shadows - they're far too much in your face for my liking.
Unless, of course, they had other, more local, customers to keep them in business.dogmatique said:Whilst I find the in your face in the open dealing unacceptable, what I find most offensive are the white, middle class tossers who think it's perfectly fine to hop off the bus / tube, score weed in front of families waiting for the bus, and then fuck off into the night to their nice cosy bolt holes.
If they didn't buy it, the dealers wouldn't be there.
articletwo said:Why does the response of the people of Brixton to illegal drug dealing depend on their class? Is it really the case that the non-professional classes don't feel the same? Sounds like the last gasp of class warfare to me.
And what is "alleged" about the anti-social nature of the dealers' behaviour - they are committing a blatant crime, and in doing so acting in a way that can intimidate some members of the community.
Worse, the slippery slope that Hatboy is implicitly suggesting is very scary: where does his principle that Londoners should have the ability to "manage a basic encounter" end: should the diasbled be able to "manage a basic encounter" with stairs, should non-whites be able to "manage a basic encounter" with racists?
There is a problem of criminal activity outside the Tube in Brixton, which creates a threatening and unpleasant atmosphere. The police, eventually, have agreed that they will put their tea down and get out there and do something about it. I welcome that.
And once the dealers are forced to stop dealing, maybe they can do what most of the rest of us have to do, which is get up every day, struggle in to a legal job, earn some money, struggle home again, and get on with leading lawful lives.
JHE said:Unless, of course, they had other, more local, customers to keep them in business.
bristle-krs said:thoroughly rubbish post, sir, please come again!
articletwo said:Why does the response of the people of Brixton to illegal drug dealing depend on their class? Is it really the case that the non-professional classes don't feel the same? Sounds like the last gasp of class warfare to me.
And what is "alleged" about the anti-social nature of the dealers' behaviour - they are committing a blatant crime, and in doing so acting in a way that can intimidate some members of the community.
Worse, the slippery slope that Hatboy is implicitly suggesting is very scary: where does his principle that Londoners should have the ability to "manage a basic encounter" end: should the diasbled be able to "manage a basic encounter" with stairs, should non-whites be able to "manage a basic encounter" with racists?
There is a problem of criminal activity outside the Tube in Brixton, which creates a threatening and unpleasant atmosphere. The police, eventually, have agreed that they will put their tea down and get out there and do something about it. I welcome that.
And once the dealers are forced to stop dealing, maybe they can do what most of the rest of us have to do, which is get up every day, struggle in to a legal job, earn some money, struggle home again, and get on with leading lawful lives.
Indeed and indeed.pooka said:Well written. Though I'd take issue with 'so-called anti-social behaviour that might inconvenience the professional classes'. My experience is that exasperation with open street drug dealing goes absolutely across the community, including many people who have been in Brixton for a lot longer than either myself or hatboy, having arrived here from much further afield and in circumstances and times of much greater disadvantage. It also includes people trying to make a living in Brixton Market.
The comments about St Agnes are exactly right. Whatever one thinks about the rights or wrongs of squatting, or whether St Agnes could have been developed into a housing coop of some sort, to turn people out in the middle of winter and to do it in so confrontational a manner as required 200 police to avoid the risk of disorder, and to preface the whole espisode with irresponsible jibes about 'parasites', smacks of pure vindictiveness.
Donna Ferentes said:The other letter is appalling.
The appalling racism? The appalling willingness of the Standard to print a letter making undetailed accusations against black people?sugar swiller said:I thought both letters were interesting. Why did you find the latter "appalling"?
Donna Ferentes said:The appalling racism? The appalling willingness of the Standard to print a letter making undetailed accusations against black people?
And you are.... oh yes, rednblack's "friend", graymon, aka shinynew-@ aka piss-weak troller shortygoldtooth. All banned (as you will be shortly).sugar swiller said:So you find the view that many white and asian children are developing negative attitudes towards black people as a result of being robbed by black kids to be wrong in fact and hence racist?
You know - the kind of spineless twat who signed me up to loads of spam lists.sugar swiller said:"Spammers Friend?" Lost me there with that one...
dum dum said:Your Jon Gaunt and i claim my five pounds.
Yeah, not being a proper Brixton 'Playa' like you, he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about.pk said:Load of pants.
Hatboy once again mistaking useless weed and crack dealers as some kind of endagered element of black culture.
If he can't handle the fact that the majority of Brixton's residents - including those who happen to be black - don't want to be pestered by junkies and other such lowlife as soon as they step out of the tube station perhaps he should be the one to move.
Maybe if he enjoys the cultural richness that is the constant hassling by surplus dealers he should move to Bogota.
St Agnes - well that's a shame, really, but it had been swamped by crack dealers operating without any fear of arrest for a while, as anyone living there will testify.
If I were a black resident of Lambeth I would be keen to stop Hatboy's efforts to represent what it is their culture is supposed to be about - he speaks for nobody but himself and his "misfit" mates - you know, the ones who enjoy all the benefits of having local professionals pay for their rent, income support, sickness pay, incapacity benefit, medicines and methodone through taxes...
That letter is an insult to the black residents of Lambeth, and his attitude is precisely why I moved away to raise a family... excusing the foul behaviour of drug addicts littering children's playgrounds with dirty needles will be next, you watch... all in the name of "diversity".