pogofish
Testicle Hairstyle
I reckon the government would quite like a major royal incident round about now. .
Was that not supposed to be the princess engagement last week?
I reckon the government would quite like a major royal incident round about now. .
And Japan, Thailand?I don't think there will be many if any monarchies left come the 22nd century, The european ones I think will go peacefully being abolished whenever the regnant monarch dies or steps down whereas I suspect the Middle Eastern ones will end in violence and a lot of it.
I can't see Chucky being passed over for the throne unless he either carks first or develops dementia, but I still reckon there is an above even chance that King Billy the Bald will be the last British Monarch, without being arsed to google it, I believe he's in his late thirties so his sprog won't get to the throne till the other side of 2050. When you consider the attitude of people towards the monarchy now compared to when Brenda came to the throne, I think there will be a good chance people won't want to continue with it, especially if the other main Commonwealth countries of Canada, NZ and Australia are republics by then.
I'll be in my 90's (or dead) come the 2050's so I won't see it I'm afraid.
the first peacefully like ours, the second one I reckon is a toss up either way, not soon of course but sometimes between now and the end of the century.And Japan, Thailand?
There will be at least one bank holiday maybe more. Its a win win really.
They won't give us a fucking thing.
That's probably what will happen to her chambermaids and so on. Hope they get enough time to empty their lockers.I also found a couple of mentions to people being sent home from work on the day her death is announced though that sounds unlikely to me.
Have a feeling I may become too distressed to work. Well, there'll be tears in my eyes...I also found a couple of mentions to people being sent home from work on the day her death is announced though that sounds unlikely to me.
Back of an envelope calculation suggests that at the time of Charlemagne you had more than 64 million ancestors. Of course a lot of these were probably the same people but it is almost certain that one (or more) of them was old Charlie himself cause he fathered a lot of kids.I'm more Scottish than English, but I dispute the reasoning behind the idea that all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne or any other one individual from his era
European genealogy FAQ is probably what you are thinking of, and you are quite right it says we are all descended from Charlemagne, and that all individuals who have any descendants among the present-day individuals are actually ancestors of all present-day individuals.I think it's pretty solid these days... the original statistical argument had (acknowledged) flaws, but since then models taking into account isolated communities have been proposed... And probably most importantly genetic evidence (the original model is from 1999) has since backed up the idea.
A trillion apparently.Back of an envelope calculation suggests that at the time of Charlemagne you had more than 64 million ancestors.
Who. Emperor CharlemagneWhat is "Charlemagne"?
It's the Duchy Originals answer to champagne.What is "Charlemagne"?
deadWhat is "Charlemagne"?
your great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great granduncle, thrice removedWhat is "Charlemagne"?
Fucking hell so Charlemagne had eighteen kids, randier than Prince Andrew
OoofftPrince Andrew has had more than 18 kids.
The other direction I'm afraid - it's a bargain off-license version of LambriniIt's the Duchy Originals answer to champagne.
True. I was thinking more in the immediate bollocks it would make of royal assent and all that nonsenseDunno about that, some will probably see it as a propaganda opportunity that they may be well placed to exploit in ways that will, at the very least, make us groan and worry.
Dunno about that, some will probably see it as a propaganda opportunity that they may be well placed to exploit in ways that will, at the very least, make us groan and worry.
"It's what she would've wanted."
There's a naming theme running through UK politics of the last three years: Brenda from Bristol; Brenda from Windsor; and Brenda from the Supreme Court. Are they somehow related?