Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Has the Queen died?

Are you typical of the classic Engerlisch?
ignorant, contempt for literacy and if it drips with the same piss which like your "thoughts" you obv seep, its got to be good?
Go home, shag some goats, come back post more boooooolooockeranss
Hard to make sense of the Engarlish, its all about, power, murder and lying so they good, killing anyone who aint blond blues eyed, woman killing piles of shite, drinking till u piss I yer pants, beating women to death, universal thug and killer proper "English" gentleman, whats not to love about the classic kill all piece of shit?
Loades really, lazy old etonian alky seepage makes up lies using Scot as a principle

Fuck off Engerlisch
Seems fair to kill you on sight, given what you have forced others to do in your name, you mass murdering scum
Given the tens of millions of deaths, caused by the whim of Westminster - fuck off English, turds too kind a disriptor

If I ever comitted mass murder, I'm pretty damn sure I'd remember.
 
Is it really OK to slag off people for being English on this forum? Because I've seen this semi-coherent idiot posting this kind of inflammatory crap on a number of other threads, adding nothing to them.

editor mango5 Lazy Llama
Please don't tag mods individually as it's rather invasive. Please use the 'report post' function. Thank you.
 
Fuck off idiot she has been reborn as vicious evil twat seepage bitch
May arse Bend Supreme...
Luv you English twats - cunt sucking disease you
LIck up dem piss dem Idiot5!!!!
Udders are big yeaah???
And this is way, waaaay over the top too. Neck wind-in-age, please. Thank you kindly.
 
I gave up halfway through the second paragraph, i want to keep my breakfast down.
Well, how silly of you. You would have missed the fact that old Queen Victoria was in fact a bloke.

Damn. I just went to read it again and it has been changed but I do know, because I did make a copy immediately (just in case there *might* be any later amendments to this "let's all think of the Empire and Queen and grovel..") that I was surprised to learn that:
". When it became public that Queen Victoria was dying, at the age of 82, a widower for half her life, “astonished grief ... swept the country”,

Well, to be a widower, she'd have to be a man, but then she is given a female pronoun. Damn, I had not realised things were so cool and trouble-free in the Victorian times.

Or it might just be a trad Grauniad typo. Oh well, it gave me a laugh. Albeit a small laugh, and not nearly enough for the pay we all give queenie in taxes.

And will she die soon?
 
Are you typical of the classic Engerlisch?
ignorant, contempt for literacy and if it drips with the same piss which like your "thoughts" you obv seep, its got to be good?
Go home, shag some goats, come back post more boooooolooockeranss
Hard to make sense of the Engarlish, its all about, power, murder and lying so they good, killing anyone who aint blond blues eyed, woman killing piles of shite, drinking till u piss I yer pants, beating women to death, universal thug and killer proper "English" gentleman, whats not to love about the classic kill all piece of shit?
Loades really, lazy old etonian alky seepage makes up lies using Scot as a principle

Fuck off Engerlisch
Seems fair to kill you on sight, given what you have forced others to do in your name, you mass murdering scum
Given the tens of millions of deaths, caused by the whim of Westminster - fuck off English, turds too kind a disriptor
"It's shite being Scottish!
We're the lowest of the low, scum of the fucking earth..."
Etc
 
Last edited:
But really, it was all so damn pompous, as though preparing us commoners as to what we ought to be doing... I mean really, if she dies in Balmoral, lots of us plebs will line the paths of her royal corpse train in order to throw flower petals at it, and because of this, there will, of course be arrangements made so that this utter deluge of flowers will not in any way detain the queen deadybones train. :facepalm:
 
"Drivers will get out of their cars..."

Not if they're going to cause a hazard they're fucking not
 
It was quite a strange and "look at the monarchy and simply behold and wonder and worship at the feet" article. Very odd. And quite horrible.

Ah well, so are the chances good that she will die off soon, then?
 
It was quite a strange and "look at the monarchy and simply behold and wonder and worship at the feet" article. Very odd. And quite horrible.

Ah well, so are the chances good that she will die off soon, then?

Ever shorter odds the more toe tapping articles there are salivating over the prospect. Bet Charles is popping in every ten minutes to ask if she's feeling peaky too.

No Monarchist but got to pity her for that, imagine a load of people clearly looking forward to your funeral so they can have a day off and see some people dressing up on TV.
 
It will be so very interesting when she does die, because then then the Daily Heil and Telegraph and such like will have to start pretending that they loved Charles and Wotssername all along, and be ever so loyal and print pages full of Union Flags for the Coronation.

Oh, it might be fun to observe the quick change. Except that it costs a bloody fortune and we have to pay it. Not good
 
Ever shorter odds the more toe tapping articles there are salivating over the prospect. Bet Charles is popping in every ten minutes to ask if she's feeling peaky too.

No Monarchist but got to pity her for that, imagine a load of people clearly looking forward to your funeral so they can have a day off and see some people dressing up on TV.

OK. Now I did imagine.

Nyah.I have given it all of 10 seconds thought and I am not sorry for her. I'd be sorry for any pain that she has, as I would for anyone, but that woman will have the best bloody medics of the world tending her.

Many others suffer ill health, serious pain, starvation, but I don't think they are in her mind,nor that of her son, not any of the lot of them.
 
It will be so very interesting when she does die, because then then the Daily Heil and Telegraph and such like will have to start pretending that they loved Charles and Wotssername all along, and be ever so loyal and print pages full of Union Flags for the Coronation.

Oh, it might be fun to observe the quick change. Except that it costs a bloody fortune and we have to pay it. Not good

She is going to cling on until either Charles carks it or he is plausibly decrepit enough to need William as regent.

I bet at xmas when she had that pneumonia and it was touch and go, they had the cook ready to poison his food.
 
Fuck knows who Sam Knight is, some poshboy no doubt. But exactly because he seems to be some very establishment-friendly dig-deeper, he looks like he's managed to get hold of that information by means of a lot of off the record interviews.

I don't like that sort of 'sources close to' shite myself, but not all of it is baseless speculation surely.

And it's not (principally ;) ) the Guardian being servile anyway -- look at the people being reported by that article.

And look at all the so called 'traditional' kerfuffle being pre-organised around Her Maj's prospective arselickfest. What would you rather they did? Ignore it and all the ridiculous flummery and historical bollocksness? Like the Independent ignored UK royalty for a few months when they first started?

All this propective ultra-servility is being reported by the Guardian.

But plenty of its readers are not royalty-worshippers in any shape or form.
it might sneer at what it sees as vulgar royalism but the guardian loves the monarchy
 
Well, how silly of you. You would have missed the fact that old Queen Victoria was in fact a bloke.

No honestly, I really can't be doing with a 'long read' of brown nosing drivel even if it did contain a vaguely amusing typo. :)
 
Very interesting article in the FT last weekend by Tim Harford about Trump's mastery of distraction being a continuation from the tobacco industry's techniques developed in the 1950's. Of course the UK has had a few hundred year head start with Royal Family. The Independent had the right idea twenty years ago - ignore them.

Subscribe to read
 
Ever shorter odds the more toe tapping articles there are salivating over the prospect. Bet Charles is popping in every ten minutes to ask if she's feeling peaky too.

No Monarchist but got to pity her for that, imagine a load of people clearly looking forward to your funeral so they can have a day off and see some people dressing up on TV.

What I'm hoping for is that Chas will be so incandescently ecstatic at his mum popping her clogs, that he has a fuck-off massive stroke that leaves him in a persistent vegetative state, whereupon his next-of-kin (for "The Good of the Country", naturally) will have the jug-eared cunt unplugged and left to choke on his own bodily fluids.

It's not too much to ask, is it?
 
What I'm hoping for is that Chas will be so incandescently ecstatic at his mum popping her clogs, that he has a fuck-off massive stroke that leaves him in a persistent vegetative state, whereupon his next-of-kin (for "The Good of the Country", naturally) will have the jug-eared cunt unplugged and left to choke on his own bodily fluids.

It's not too much to ask, is it?

People seem to like Brian's son though, more so than him, so maybe him having it for a good few years may disengage some of the throngs who think monarchies are a good thing. Plus I think the son is only about my age, mid-30s, so that would probably lock us into the archaic system for another few decades with no questions asked by the masses.
 
it might sneer at what it sees as vulgar royalism but the guardian loves the monarchy

Fuck knows what you think about the Mail and Sun then :hmm:
I'm not going to defend the Guardian's zillion faults, and bloody hell it has plenty, but excess monarchy-loving isn't one of them IMO.
And that particular article was a useful (albeit cringemaking) forewarning of how nauseating things are going to be generally in this country when the old Q pops it. Looked like it'd been researched properly, probably. Letting your hatred of the Guardian get in the way of that is idiotic.
Part of what I posted earlier (#1020, p. 35) :
William of Walworth said:
Fuck knows who Sam Knight is, some poshboy no doubt. But exactly because he seems to be some very establishment-friendly dig-deeper, he looks like he's managed to get hold of that information by means of a lot of off the record interviews.
I don't like that sort of 'sources close to' shite myself, but not all of it is baseless speculation surely.
And it's not (principally ;) ) the Guardian being servile anyway -- look at the people being reported by that article.
 
Fuck knows what you think about the Mail and Sun then :hmm:
I'm not going to defend the Guardian's zillion faults, and bloody hell it has plenty, but excess monarchy-loving isn't one of them IMO.
And that particular article was a useful (albeit cringemaking) forewarning of how nauseating things are going to be generally in this country when the old Q pops it. Looked like it'd been researched properly, probably. Letting your hatred of the Guardian get in the way of that is idiotic.
Part of what I posted earlier (#1020, p. 35) :
any amount of monarchism is an excess amount. of course it hides behind an air of critical distance.

as the Guardian itself says in a recent pro Prince Charles editorial, it should be "kept under review" but kept all the same.

the Guardian is concerned with the stability and endurance of the institutions of the British state and British capitalism. that it regards itself as a concerned friend rather than, like the Sun and Mail, as an attack dog, doesn't erase the substantial alignment of interests and ideology.
 
Back
Top Bottom