exosculate said:Its got alot of holes in it as you might expect. But it does in places highlight some interesting stuff and unanswered questions.
Click here
Only in your gullible "truth-seeking" mind, of course.Jazzz said:With one or two problems it takes apart the official theory comprehensively
Don't think you have to be an "avid reader" to get the gist of the rag.vimto said:Daily Mail?
Is this a Canadian Publication you talk about or are you an avid reader of the UK version Johnny?
No idea what you're on about, but...Groucho said:We just haven't got a clue what to do....
editor said:No idea what you're on about, but...
editor said:And the, of course, there's the other lyrical masterpiece sung by the same band:
"Up town, down town
Little Willy, Willy drives them wild with his run-around style
Inside, outside
Willy sends them silly with his star-shine shimmy shuffle smile"
What could they be singing about?!
Now now editor...remember the Johnny rule noweditor said:And the, of course, there's the other lyrical masterpiece sung by the same band:
"Up town, down town
Little Willy, Willy drives them wild with his run-around style
Inside, outside
Willy sends them silly with his star-shine shimmy shuffle smile"
What could they be singing about?!
Jazzz said:Yes - it's damn good and very well produced.
CliffChuff said:Thats just put me off it
I was put off it as soon as it started shunting out the same old fact-free conjecture.spring-peeper said:Well, I was totally put off to begin with. But after reading vimto's comments, maybe I will give it a watch.
It is a quaint custom of human discourse that the responsibility for substantiating a claim generally lies with the party making the claim. It isn't usually considered acceptable that people pull wild and spurious claims out of their arses for the rest of society to disprove. So your challenge to editor ends up looking a little foolish...Jazzz said:So no evidence then, just an appeal to majority opinion.
There's been plenty. I'm not rising to these taunts. Watch the film or shut up.editor said:Only in your gullible "truth-seeking" mind, of course.
So, concerning the trifling matter of producing some actual, credible, hard evidence for this incredible deception... any movement there yet?
Come up with some credible evidence or shut the fuck up.Jazzz said:Watch the film or shut up.
exosculate said:Its not an all or nothing argument.
So what research have you actually undertaken into these 'questions?exosculate said:It does however ask some awkward questions which have clearly not been answered - and that information appears to have been suppressed. i.e Hotel footage of the Pentagon crash - where is it? Or where is the wreckage from the fourth Whitehouse destined plane? These and other details have alot of validity and give the film some value.
editor said:Surely you haven't forgotten the woefully unresearched claims that Jazzz used to come up with? (the one about the '9/11 planes not existing' was one of the more memorable - a simple email to the airline from two posters here produced a perfectly reasonable answer to the 'mysteriously unanswered question')
Jazzz said:Why not taking a break from picking your nose and watch it pingu? You never know, you might be able to say that you weren't one of the people left behind when it came to saving humanity