Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gremlins vs Ghostbusters

Gremlins vs Ghostbusters


  • Total voters
    51
First Gremlins is utterly ordinary, whereas Ghostbusters is ace.

Easy, easy choice.

Gremlins appears to become on ordinary kiddy, film and then, thanks to Joe Dante's twisted sensibility, turns unexpectedly and delightfully nasty. Phoebe Cates' speech why she hates Christmas alone puts this ahead of Ghostbusters for me.

There is much to like about Ghostbusters, especially Murray's and Weavers relaxed, easygoing performances, but it's all over the place and I always found it a rather ugly looking film. Much of it tries to appeal to what kids considered cool at the time, but by the time this was released I already wasn't a kid anymore. It always struck me as a bit childish, now it seems very dated. Gremlins on the other hand still is like a cuddly toy with razorblades on the inside.

In Dante, Gremlins has the vision of a gifted director behind it, Ghostbusters is a bit of a ragbag of a film cooked up by a group of people, some things about it are fun, others make me grind my teeth.
 
In fairness, it's a long time since I saw Gremlins, whereas I've seen Ghostbusters much more recently.

And my memory isn't always the most reliable. :)
 
Gremlins appears to become on ordinary kiddy, film and then, thanks to Joe Dante's twisted sensibility, turns unexpectedly and delightfully nasty. Phoebe Cates' speech why she hates Christmas alone puts this ahead of Ghostbusters for me.

There is much to like about Ghostbusters, especially Murray's and Weavers relaxed, easygoing performances, but it's all over the place and I always found it a rather ugly looking film. Much of it tries to appeal to what kids considered cool at the time, but by the time this was released I already wasn't a kid anymore. It always struck me as a bit childish, now it seems very dated. Gremlins on the other hand still is like a cuddly toy with razorblades on the inside.

In Dante, Gremlins has the vision of a gifted director behind it, Ghostbusters is a bit of a ragbag of a film cooked up by a group of people, some things about it are fun, others make me grind my teeth.

But I think it's Gremlins 2 which shows what a great director Dante is. If it hadn't been for 2, 1 would seem like nothing out of the ordinary.

2 is post modern, self-referential, utterly hilarious and one of the most underrated sequels ever...
 
Ghostbusters, the only film that made me and my mates make proton packs out of cardboard boxes and used toilet rolls.

Yes, the sequel was a bit poor but then number of one liners in the first film makes up for it.

"Listen... do you smell something?"
 
i'd be surprised if any other film made you do that... apart from ghostbusters 2 of course

That's true, I should of said that 'The only film that made me rush home and recreate the props from the film in thirty minutes was Ghostbusters'

The DeLorean from Back To The Future would taken us a couple of months to build, the Nostromo from Alien , a year or so.
 
But I think it's Gremlins 2 which shows what a great director Dante is. If it hadn't been for 2, 1 would seem like nothing out of the ordinary.

2 is post modern, self-referential, utterly hilarious and one of the most underrated sequels ever...

It's so true, it's fucking funny!
 
But I think it's Gremlins 2 which shows what a great director Dante is. If it hadn't been for 2, 1 would seem like nothing out of the ordinary.

2 is post modern, self-referential, utterly hilarious and one of the most underrated sequels ever...

I like Gremlins 2 as much as the first film. It's the rare sequel that is quite a different film from the original.
 
Back
Top Bottom