This is quite the reverse - a loan is made and insurance bought by the lender in case the loanee defaults. Not a situation any of the rest of us could ever be in.
Vilifying private holders of government debt while the ECB and IMF rigs the table can only encourage the private sector to walk away from all European debt issues. Bond buyers aren't Wonga.com. they aren't in for the high returns its the safe solid foundation part of the books and its EU governance that's trashingYeah agreed - i was talking more generally about CDS's in principle
However the point remains that there's nothing stopping a holder of bonds/loans taking out insurance on them for many multiples of the actual loan exposure. So that gives them a seat at the table for things like talks on voluntary debt reductions (allowing them to hold out on it) while still having a net overall short position - thus giving them a perverse incentive to push for a disorderly and deeper default as they stand to gain more on the 'insurance' than they lose on the default on the long bond position
Also wouldn't be surprised if some of these hedge funds had bought CDS protection on greek debt a year or so ago when it was a lot cheaper, and only recently bought some greek bonds in the market now that their next to worthless in order to give them a seat at the table when it comes to talks on debt reduction etc..
No idea what your last sentence means
1) A year ago 5Y CDS's were trading at around 900, that's a chunky premium in anyone's language (remember that's the annual amount paid in quarterly installments). . . Also wouldn't be surprised if some of these hedge funds had bought CDS protection on greek debt a year or so ago when it was a lot cheaper, and only recently bought some greek bonds in the market now that their next to worthless in order to give them a seat at the table when it comes to talks on debt reduction etc..
Vilifying private holders of government debt while the ECB and IMF rigs the table can only encourage the private sector to walk away from all European debt issues
1) A year ago 5Y CDS's were trading at around 900, that's a chunky premium in anyone's language (remember that's the annual amount paid in quarterly installments)
2) Legging into a long CDS, long underlying on a 6 month view (so you've gotta pay out for the bonds as well, repoing them for eg doesn't give you legal ownership iirc) is (imo) not really a strategy that anyone's going to explicitly enter, it's just not . . . realistic (can't find a better word atm), too much can happen on that time frame.
Aren't you just making ld's point here?1)
To contextualise your numbers, it's well worth anyone buying Euro Sov debt in the low 20's on an historic basis as Argentina was trading 20-25 after default (but before the restructuring) and I remember Ivory Coast quoted 18-22 when that civil war was going on in the early 2000's. As a rule of thumb, recovery rates on a decent sovereign tend to get marked at 30%.
Pretty much, most IB's seem to have come out in the summer in the mid-60's from what I can gather. . . Also, who is selling these debts at 20%? Is this hedge funds with deep pockets ripping off others with shallower pockets?
Does anyone else think that they'd be better just giving up? Lending more and more money to someone in too much debt isn't ever going to work in the longer run, so why not just give up?
Giles..
(Reuters) - Greece's largest police union has threatened to issue arrest warrants for officials from the country's European Union and International Monetary Fund lenders for demanding deeply unpopular austerity measures.
In a letter obtained by Reuters Friday, the Federation of Greek Police accused the officials of "...blackmail, covertly abolishing or eroding democracy and national sovereignty" and said one target of its warrants would be the IMF's top official for Greece, Poul Thomsen.
The threat is largely symbolic since legal experts say a judge must first authorize such warrants, but it shows the depth of anger against foreign lenders who have demanded drastic wage and pension cuts in exchange for funds to keep Greece afloat....
In all seriousness LD, I can't make myself any clearer without writing a couple of pages of definitions instead of using jargon as a convenient professional shorthand.
You clearly know your beans but I suspect that you're not quite getting the finer nuances of my argument.
Please accept that I say that with the greatest of respect and have absolutely no wish to enter into a bun-fight over this.