Corax
Luke 5:16
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/07/racial-harassment-charge-golliwog-window
By reading that account, it does appear that it was put in the window as a deliberate act to cause offence.
But I'm unsure whether that's a bit of a dangerous precedent to be setting. It's a 'historical' (if deplorable) item, placed somewhere in someone's private home. If she then said or did anything to her neighbour, then it could certainly be used as evidence to back that offence. But as an offence on it's own?
I wouldn't shed any tears to see Mason fined or whatever, but I have some misgivings on whether people could then in the future be prosecuted for (for example) putting up political posters in their own houses if they're displayed in the window where a passer-by could see it.
It's nothing much, but just wondered what others on here thought about it.
By reading that account, it does appear that it was put in the window as a deliberate act to cause offence.
But I'm unsure whether that's a bit of a dangerous precedent to be setting. It's a 'historical' (if deplorable) item, placed somewhere in someone's private home. If she then said or did anything to her neighbour, then it could certainly be used as evidence to back that offence. But as an offence on it's own?
I wouldn't shed any tears to see Mason fined or whatever, but I have some misgivings on whether people could then in the future be prosecuted for (for example) putting up political posters in their own houses if they're displayed in the window where a passer-by could see it.
It's nothing much, but just wondered what others on here thought about it.