A very interesting post emanymton, but I wonder if you should delete it - there might be too much info, especially with the breakdown of the jury and mention of some of the victim's actions.
That's a really useful post emanymton, thanks (edited out because it is in froggy's post above).
I wasn't aware that juries were allowed to go for majority verdicts after as little as four hours. Anyone know the legals on this?
Many rape cases come down to 'he said she said' and without physical evidence that's all there is. If the CPS/fiscal declines to prosecute because of the lack of evidence, that's it.Must be very hard to secure convictions if it needs to be proved "beyond reasonable doubt" - you'd need some criterion of secure objective evidence beyond the simply testimony of the plaintiff? And since there won't normally be witnesses you're talking medical evidence or some kind of behavioural evidence - but if there are no typical post-rape behaviours then what would this be?
No wonder rape victims are deterred from reporting it, given the low prospect of a conviction and the traumatic nature of giving evidence
Bear in mind how de-politicised the NUS has become since then, then add in the factionalism that identity politics caused to campus solidarities, and you can pretty much track the "clueing down".
I'd contend that the whole "lad" phenomenon wasn't a "resurgence" so much as a concentration of the least savoury aspects of post-war male behaviour into a loose subculture.
I have nothing but contempt for anybody who makes a false accusation of rape. It makes it so much harder for other women to report genuine attacks as well as dragging an innocent man through an unneccessary trial.Well, there are women in the past who have made false rape claims vexatiously. So the simple fact of making the accusation can't be enough? Would you want to change the burden of proof so the accused has to show that he *didn't* do it? I'm not sure that that's the way to go either - how could you *prove* that you'd had consensual sex?
Maybe previous convictions for sexual assault should be declared to juries. But it's all a bit of a minefield.
Going back to the 'rape jokes' issue and wether this is indicative of unedrlying mysogyny.
if you look at any situation where racism, homophobia etc are given even the smallest breathing space the bigots rush in to fill their boots.
Look at the public comments on newpapare sights after the dale farm farago - 'these filthy pikies with their bollocks about ethnic cleansing and racism! They should be wiped out!' etc etc etc - absolulte open season. Give these cunts an inch ...
This - to me - is whats going on with rape jokes and this uni-lad shit. It opens up a space where all that festering hatred and resentment towards women can spew out under the cover of 'irony'. Again - the face book comments would seem to very much bear that out. As other have pointed out - rape is a tool of power and control and 'jokes' about the issue seem very much a way of putting them uppity bitches back in their place.
On another note - I think this thread has been useful in highlighting just how much sexual violence - and the threat of sexual violence - oppresses women. And that this oppression is so insidious and internalised its almost invisible. This is somehting I have learnt over the years from being close to women who have suffered from sexual violence and who have worked with victims . But this oppression is an issue that many many men have no understadning of and that women accept as a normal state of affairs.
So for all the advances for women in terms of equal pay, education and legal rights - a huge iceberg of unversal and consistant oppression goes virtually unchallenged. Fuck 'glass ceilings' and women in the boardroom - this is the battle the should be being fought.
But how? Trying to improve conviction rates seems to get virtually nowhere and tinlering with the legal system is horrendourouly complex and could have all sorts of negative unintentded consequences.
The focus should be education - not for women who already all too aware what they are facing - but education aimed at men - and young men in particular. The issue need to dragged out into the open rather then swept under the carpet as it is now.
Going back to the 'rape jokes' issue and wether this is indicative of unedrlying mysogyny.
if you look at any situation where racism, homophobia etc are given even the smallest breathing space the bigots rush in to fill their boots.
Look at the public comments on newpapare sights after the dale farm farago - 'these filthy pikies with their bollocks about ethnic cleansing and racism! They should be wiped out!' etc etc etc - absolulte open season. Give these cunts an inch ...
This - to me - is whats going on with rape jokes and this uni-lad shit. It opens up a space where all that festering hatred and resentment towards women can spew out under the cover of 'irony'. Again - the face book comments would seem to very much bear that out. As other have pointed out - rape is a tool of power and control and 'jokes' about the issue seem very much a way of putting them uppity bitches back in their place.
On another note - I think this thread has been useful in highlighting just how much sexual violence - and the threat of sexual violence - oppresses women. And that this oppression is so insidious and internalised its almost invisible. This is somehting I have learnt over the years from being close to women who have suffered from sexual violence and who have worked with victims . But this oppression is an issue that many many men have no understadning of and that women accept as a normal state of affairs.
So for all the advances for women in terms of equal pay, education and legal rights - a huge iceberg of unversal and consistant oppression goes virtually unchallenged. Fuck 'glass ceilings' and women in the boardroom - this is the battle the should be being fought.
But how? Trying to improve conviction rates seems to get virtually nowhere and tinlering with the legal system is horrendourouly complex and could have all sorts of negative unintentded consequences.
The focus should be education - not for women who already all too aware what they are facing - but education aimed at men - and young men in particular. The issue need to dragged out into the open rather then swept under the carpet as it is now.
Well, there are women in the past who have made false rape claims vexatiously.
So the simple fact of making the accusation can't be enough? Would you want to change the burden of proof so the accused has to show that he *didn't* do it? I'm not sure that that's the way to go either - how could you *prove* that you'd had consensual sex?
Maybe previous convictions for sexual assault should be declared to juries. But it's all a bit of a minefield.
<snip>Well, that's a fairly fraught issue. At the moment it's often incumbent on the complainant to prove that they didn't "consent" to sex, and for some juries, consent can be seen in non-resistance. If a woman can be damned as having consented to sex because she didn't violently repulse her attacker, in effect because she may have "frozen" with shock, what does that say about the current burden of proof?
<snip>
I think in many people's minds, non-consent is equated to force, which for example in date rape cases or those where a large amount of alcohol has been involved, may not have been used. Until the focus is removed from the victim's bahaviour in rape cases, this meshing of these two things (which are in fact separate) will still happen.
Nah.On another note - I think this thread has been useful in highlighting just how much sexual violence - and the threat of sexual violence - oppresses women. And that this oppression is so insidious and internalised its almost invisible. This is somehting I have learnt over the years from being close to women who have suffered from sexual violence and who have worked with victims . But this oppression is an issue that many many men have no understadning of and that women accept as a normal state of affairs.
So for all the advances for women in terms of equal pay, education and legal rights - a huge iceberg of unversal and consistant oppression goes virtually unchallenged. Fuck 'glass ceilings' and women in the boardroom - this is the battle the should be being fought.
Ironically enough I had far more injuries from being drugged and raped than I did from fighting off an attacker when sober-ish....I think in many people's minds, non-consent is equated to force, which for example in date rape cases or those where a large amount of alcohol has been involved, may not have been used. Until the focus is removed from the victim's bahaviour in rape cases, this meshing of these two things (which are in fact separate) will still happen.
I think we all accept that rape is a difficult crime to prosecute and that it always will be. I think most women would be happy to know that a complaint will be taken seriously, will be investigated properly, and that her past sexual history, wardrobe or use of intoxicating substances will never be used to claim that she brought it on herself.Well, there are women in the past who have made false rape claims vexatiously. So the simple fact of making the accusation can't be enough? Would you want to change the burden of proof so the accused has to show that he *didn't* do it? I'm not sure that that's the way to go either - how could you *prove* that you'd had consensual sex?
Maybe previous convictions for sexual assault should be declared to juries. But it's all a bit of a minefield.
Nah.
Your not seriously gonna tell me that we're all sexually oppressed as women are you? That's just... bullshit. No offence. Women play this game as much as men, and we're not your victims lulz. Get yourself down Calls Lane and watch how it works It's men who are the desperate ones, men who can't get a shag and end up lonely and women who work the bar and men to there advantage.
I'm not scared of men just cos they have cocks ffs it's fists you have to watch.
Nah I know the difference.Oppressed not repressed.
http://www.endviolenceagainstwomen....nt_world_is_possible_report_email_version.pdf1 in 2 boys and 1 in 3 girls believe that there are some circumstances when it is
okay to hit a woman or force her to have sex.
Are there ANY circumstances in which it's ok to force a woman to have sex (nb. rhetorical question)
Are there ANY circumstances in which it's ok to force a woman to have sex (nb. rhetorical question)