Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Global financial system implosion begins

Liability-driven investment (LDI) is a process in which future pension commitments (liabilities) are hedged via long-dated bonds. This is sensible in concept, because liabilities (future pension payments) are discounted by the prevailing yield on long-dated bonds.

charming article here describing all this (which I hadn't heard of-though I concede that many Brain of Morbius types of here may eat drink and sleep LDIs)

The FT are interested in the issue too - but who could resist this CityWire article starting like this:?
"My fellow Northern Irishman George Best used to tell a story of how a waiter delivering more champagne to his hotel room one night found him on the bed with Miss World, both covered in £50 notes. Shaking his head, the waiter looked at the legendary former footballer and said: ‘George, where did it all go wrong?’"
 

Attachments

  • UK bond turmoil_ Where did it all go wrong_ And why it should get better from here - Citywire.pdf
    432.3 KB · Views: 13
I spent 1¼ hours in the Halifax yesterday getting my ISA upgraded from 0.45% to 3.4%
I thought it was me - but these banks are almost immune to paying decent rates on legacy accounts.
Having tracked Kwasi Kwarteng though Heathrow on Sky I'm thinking I should have delayed till next week.
Or maybe not. I don't remember such volatility since Black Monday in 1987.
That was accompanied by a hurricane though. PACE Michael Fish.
 
I'm not watching one and a half hours of someone I've never heard of before, could you summarise it in like two sentences or something?
In 2011, while working as a City trader, Gary Stevenson (@GarysEconomics) joined the ultra rich with a single bonus cheque. Not long after he was named one of Citibank’s highest performing traders worldwide. Stevenson made millions for his employer by betting on one thing: that the British and American economies would fail to recover from the global financial crisis, that inequality would only get worse and living standards would stagnate. That made him rich, but miserable. Which is why Gary would later leave his job to campaign on inequality. In this interview he discusses his personal story - from studying at the LSE to the working culture of one of the world’s biggest banks - to what the economics of the 2020s will look like, and how the plan is to destroy the middle class.
 
what makes him additionally interesting and having a unique perspective is that he comes from a poor family - Barking? Romford? East London somewhere. I forget now, and has a perpetual outsiders view of the whole shitshow of the banking world...and he says its that perspective that makes him a top trader often making correct predictions where the rich insulated insiders get it wrong

lots of topics covered in the video, all very interesting and unlike most economists came across as accurate to me
 
Loads of traders are working class and from Essex.

This is the LME, which is the last open outcry floor. Basically everyone in this pic is from Romford or Billericay etc. Not sure it gives that YouTuber the edge he claims:

Captur2e.JPG
 
Loads of traders are working class and from Essex.

This is the LME, which is the last open outcry floor. Basically everyone in this pic is from Romford or Billericay etc. Not sure it gives that YouTuber the edge he claims:

View attachment 347260

He talks about that a bit. He says the notion of the east end barrow boy trader, if it was true at some point in the 80s has fully reversed in recent years and in his experience is the usual rich boys club other parts of the establishment are - at least within the floors he was on
 
what makes him additionally interesting and having a unique perspective is that he comes from a poor family - Barking? Romford? East London somewhere. I forget now, and has a perpetual outsiders view of the whole shitshow of the banking world...and he says its that perspective that makes him a top trader often making correct predictions where the rich insulated insiders get it wrong

lots of topics covered in the video, all very interesting and unlike most economists came across as accurate to me
Ilford
He talks about that a bit. He says the notion of the east end barrow boy trader, if it was true at some point in the 80s has fully reversed in recent years and in his experience is the usual rich boys club other parts of the establishment are - at least within the floors he was on
Very much this
 
I'm not watching one and a half hours of someone I've never heard of before, could you summarise it in like two sentences or something?
That would be my reaction usually as well, but as someone who pretty much never listens to a 1.5hr video or podcast (this is also available on spotify), and usually gives up in the first 10 mins when I do, I'm going to say that this one was worth every minute. It has an interesting personal story, amusing take-downs of top economists, savage attacks on long term government policy, clearer descriptions of how the economy works than you'll hear almost anywhere, and good politics as well.
 
I watched it, it’s quite understandable on 1.5x speed which chops half an hour off. In summary “capitalism is finished” = home-ownership is finished for working class people without inheritance etc who save a deposit from from their earnings. This is due to QE and low interest rates which has caused asset price inflation. This needs to be unwound by taxing wealth.
 
I watched it, it’s quite understandable on 1.5x speed which chops half an hour off. In summary “capitalism is finished” = home-ownership is finished for working class people without inheritance etc who save a deposit from from their earnings. This is due to QE and low interest rates which has caused asset price inflation. This needs to be unwound by taxing wealth.
In the US I believe this is less of an issue as house prices seem to move down as well as up,
I was intrigued to check out Evanston - a mixed but quite posh university suburb NW of Chicago (home NW University of Illinois) - but also easily and cheaoly commutable to downtown Chicago. Flats from $110,000, houses from $360,000/
Why is rip-off Britain such a rip-off? Same as London ooop north eg Manchester or York
 
Because it’s not true.


Essex resident*, it's got a lot of moderately well off sons of working class traders cosplaying as cheeky barrow boys (with flat caps, thanks to peaky blinders I think), acting as if they are the next big recruitment agent or recruitment consultant, I have my doubts many of them are any good.

Mostly it's cab drivers and builders who seem to work on each others houses.

*Fringes anyway
 
In the US I believe this is less of an issue as house prices seem to move down as well as up,
I was intrigued to check out Evanston - a mixed but quite posh university suburb NW of Chicago (home NW University of Illinois) - but also easily and cheaoly commutable to downtown Chicago. Flats from $110,000, houses from $360,000/
Why is rip-off Britain such a rip-off? Same as London ooop north eg Manchester or York
UK is better if you count cards...US are all on 20 year mortgage deals...UK mortgage deals make it a much shorter stack
 
UK is better if you count cards...US are all on 20 year mortgage deals...UK mortgage deals make it a much shorter stack
Can you say that in plain English?
Another difference is the American practice of "foreclosure" which seems to create a property bargain basement.
Which used to be the case in London until the 1980s when property developers and builders inserted themselves between the bargains and the buyers.
 
Back
Top Bottom