Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

General Election 2015 - chat, predictions, results and post election discussion

I don't think they intend to prop it up. Sturgeon has made clear that they'll offer Lab 'confidence' (QS) and thereafter support(or not) on a case-by-case basis with no formalised agreement, let alone coalition. Sturgeon has said all this knowing that Lab will keep the nukes.
Exactly. The SNP don't want coalition. They want a vote by vote arrangement. And Labour doesn't need the SNP to support a Trident replacement: there is enough support in the House for that without the SNP.
 
The MOD is apparently considering Gibraltar.

The difficulties of relocating Trident are discussed in the report from CND: http://www.banthebomb.org/images/stories/pdfs/noplacefortrident.pdf (PDF).

That's a bit one-sided - as you would expect, given the source. The problems it states with relocation in England are in part political, not technical. That they don't want the base within a certain distance of people will likely have to be sacrificed. They're considering that for Gibraltar, after all.
 
They cant just move it to Milford Sound
They certainly can't being as it's a world heritage site in a national park in a independent country with a long standing no nukes policy.(US warships are unable to visit NZ because they won't say which ones have nukes on them)

E2a,possibly you where referring to Milford Haven after which Milford Sound is named.
 
Last edited:
That's a bit one-sided - as you would expect, given the source. The problems it states with relocation in England are in part political, not technical. That they don't want the base within a certain distance of people will likely have to be sacrificed. They're considering that for Gibraltar, after all.

What if we bung it in the Falklands? Not like anyone really gives a fuck about there aside from a few mental Argies.
 
And Labour doesn't need the SNP to support a Trident replacement: there is enough support in the House for that without the SNP.

Is there? We Conservatives are nothing if not pragmatic and ethically flexible. I'm sure some excuse to vote against it could be manufactured if it meant inflicting a scalding defeat on Ed M.
 
Is there? We Conservatives are nothing if not utterly stupid and unprincipledly flexible. I'm sure some excuse to vote against it could be manufactured if it meant inflicting a scalding defeat on Ed M. by shooting ourselves in the foot
corrected for you
 
Is there? We Conservatives are nothing if not pragmatic and ethically flexible. I'm sure some excuse to vote against it could be manufactured if it meant inflicting a scalding defeat on Ed M.
Ideological and doctrinal neo-liberals find it convenient to hide behind the false facade of 'pragmatism'. Anyway, this is not an issue over which the deep state will permit the party to play politics.
 
What is it with people and daft half-baked theories on this thread? It's as if the novelty of hung parliaments has turned people's brains to blancmange.
8gb_novelty_shaped_usb_storage_hamburger_flash_memory_drive__87556_zoom.jpg

this is a novelty
 
They certainly can't being as it's a world heritage site in a national park in a independent country with a long standing no nukes policy.(US warships are unable to visit NZ because they won't say which ones have nukes on them)

E2a,possibly you where referring to Milford Haven after which Milford Sound is named.
ahem.....maaaaaaaaybe
 
The spike coincides with the Coalition’s introduction of the benefit cap and “bedroom tax”, both of which have made it significantly harder for poor people to afford housing in London. In 2010, the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, vowed that the controversial welfare reforms would not lead to “Kosovo-style social cleansing”, pledging: “You are not going to see thousands of families evicted from the place where they have been living.”

Got that wrong didn't he?
 
Back
Top Bottom