articul8
Dishonest sociopath
Politician logic
There is a problem.
In itself this particular reform might help, but it won't cure the problem.
Let's not bother
Ultra-left logic
Politician logic
There is a problem.
In itself this particular reform might help, but it won't cure the problem.
Let's not bother
Ultra-left logic
As I said, they're not *sufficient" protection - but without CCTV can we be certain that the level of assaults wouldn't be higher still??
Oh come on, that's just pathetic.Freedom to abuse animals?
Like they can call on him and Ed to defend zero hour contracts.Indeed all those employers, landowners and state officials could call on you in their defence; 'look' they could say 'even sensible Labour Party people like articul8 can see what a good job we're doing!'
It's entirely consistent politician logic.Oh come on, that's just pathetic.
I don't see how this follows. I'm clear that the biggest root cause of animal abuse in food production is systematic, a result of industrial scale intensive farming. That needs tackling as a priority. But if CCTV can offer a measure of transparency and accountability - so that producers and workers aren't protected from commiting needless acts of suffering behind the walled gates of the unit, this seems to be a good thing.What CCTV also does is excuse those same employers, land owners and state bodies from engaging with other protective measures; after all they are doing something valuable already.
that's nothing like what he said. but wtf, lets all play attack the point because of who made it yet again, it's the best thing about the whole board!It's entirely consistent politician logic.
Animals are being abused.
This is a measure aimed at reducing animal abuse.
Therefore, if you oppose this measure, you are in favour of animals being abused.
Now that's pathetic - I am totally opposed to exploitation of workers on zero hours contracts, and have actively campaigned against them. To sugget I "defend" them is a downright lieOh come on, that's just pathetic.
Like they can call on him and Ed to defend zero hour contracts.
Sad thing is that in three-four years time I can easily see a8 defending Labour's attacks on those on benefits.
Yes it is. I oppose a measure because it impinges on freedom, and he says that this implies that I support freedom to abuse animals. The logic does not follow.that's nothing like what he said. but wtf, lets all play attack the point because of who made it yet again, it's the best thing about the whole board!
I know enough to understand that the argument that individual freedom is sacrosanct is a classically liberal positionOne of the ironies here is that a8 fancies himself as a philosophy student.
Freedom. Infinite freedom. Except to do something I don't agree with....Yes it is. I oppose a measure because it impinges on freedom, and he says that this implies that I support freedom to abuse animals. The logic does not follow.
Nobody is arguing that, though.I know enough to understand that the argument that individual freedom is sacrosanct is a classically liberal position
And again. Unless I support your measure, I'm supporting some idea of infinite freedom. Extending spy cameras is the only way to address the issue. Either you spy or people can do whatever they want.Freedom. Infinite freedom. Except to do something I don't agree with....
Well I didn't I argue that "freedom doesn't matter"Nobody is arguing that, though.
That was more of a longer-scale thing. You consistently argue on here for authoritarian top-down measures.Well I didn't I argue that "freedom doesn't matter"
like what?That was more of a longer-scale thing. You consistently argue on here for authoritarian top-down measures.
Like thelike what?
He did no such thing. he pointed out that 'freedom' encompasses all sorts of things that are, generally, unsupported, thus pointing out the central contradiction of your post.Yes it is. I oppose a measure because it impinges on freedom, and he says that this implies that I support freedom to abuse animals. The logic does not follow.
this isn't true. Although thisAnd so, yet another thread becomes (in essence) all about a8 being a shit, because a8 is in the labour party.
probably is.A complete and utter waste of time, and liable to make people, except the few partaking, to go 'sod this'
And so, yet another thread becomes (in essence) all about a8 being a shit, because a8 is in the labour party. A complete and utter waste of time, and liable to make people, except the few partaking, to go 'sod this'
This is well put. I'll desist as well. fwiw I don't have a go at a8 because he's in the Labour Party, but because I find his ideas mostly horrifying.Apologies I did use his party affiliation as a chance to have a cheap shot.
However, my main point is that CCTV is a potentially dangerous, necessarily partial and individualising solution (it makes us be our own police) to problems that are socially produced and to which we should be looking for similarly social answers.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
you have lived a very sheltered life in that case...I find his ideas mostly horrifying.
i would say I'm a civil libertarian compared to many - but no so much when it comes to animal cruelty and beating up the elderlyI have many friends in the labour party who don't advocate stasi-lite policies.