I used it at Lisbon and it was great because it was quiet. However there were only 2 guys to do the stamping which I imagine would be a bit of a bottle neck if it was busy.So I was at Lisbon airport recently and noticed a special lane for non-EU but approved countries to use e-gates which included the U.K. first time I’ve seen this option for non-EU/EEA/CH passports in the EU. I’m always having to be stamped in manually on a UK passport and that includes recent trips to major cities like Amsterdam and Berlin.
Unfortunately I was transiting so I didn’t get to use the gates but it’s the first time I think I’ve not had to get a physical check/stamp on arrival to the EU since Brexshit.
Has anyone else seen anything similar in the EU? (I know we do it in the U.K. for EU, US, Japan etc passports)
View attachment 453754
I used it at Lisbon and it was great because it was quiet. However there were only 2 guys to do the stamping which I imagine would be a bit of a bottle neck if it was busy.
Yeah clear the egate than you get stamped. I suspect it's in preparation for the new system where after first entry when they take prints it's easy entry and exit for a few yearsSo it’s an e-gate but also a stamp in situation?
Yeah clear the egate than you get stamped. I suspect it's in preparation for the new system where after first entry when they take prints it's easy entry and exit for a few years
Yes. Was in operation in Milan when I shot through there a few weeks ago. E-gate for UK passports, then a couple of bored border staff stamping them just after the gates.Has anyone else seen anything similar in the EU? (I know we do it in the U.K. for EU, US, Japan etc passports)
WeatherThe fuck is that?
First heavier than air powered flight. 121 years ago today 17 December 1903.
Thanks, that made this morning’s S92 flight feel all the more luxurious.Two blades is actually the most efficient and will give the greatest speed (and least weight), but having more blades makes the ride less wobbly and is preferable for civilian uses. This is true for marine propellers, as well. With the added issues of cavitation thrown in for fun. This is why you see submarines with 8+ blades on the prop.
Ryanair?Thanks, that made this morning’s S92 flight feel all the more luxurious.
View attachment 455884
no, I could check luggage without cost!Ryanair?
Two blades is actually the most efficient and will give the greatest speed (and least weight), but having more blades makes the ride less wobbly and is preferable for civilian uses. This is true for marine propellers, as well. With the added issues of cavitation thrown in for fun. This is why you see submarines with 8+ blades on the prop.
Good call, I come at it more from the marine side where size isn't really such a concern, it's more about vibration and cavitation. Cavitation being basically the transonic problem in water.One blade would be the theoretically most efficient if not the most practical.
More blades are used when the load on the rotor disk is too great for fewer blades. To generate a relatively greater lift the speed of the advancing tip would get very high compared to the speed of the retreating tip - the 'Advance Ratio'. If this ratio gets out of limits then the retreating blade will stall. Even if the retreating blade doesn't stall then the advancing blade will start to hit Mach Buffet in the transonic regime and then that blade would stall.
To get around this and reduce tip speed, more and smaller blades are used. Their are also logistical and size constraints where more, smaller blades would be preferred over fewer, larger.