Yes there is. How much it will be enforced is another question.Unlike the BBCthere’s no clause saying they need to be unbiased or honest or good
Young man grow up, you'll learn something.
Unlike the BBCthere’s no clause saying they need to be unbiased or honest or good
I suspect they were more motivated to find someone who was cheap more than any other criteriaHe thinks their sound problems are down to a lack of "state of the art sound equipment"?
I suspect that someone with a bunch of webcams and a pile of open source software could do a better job than they're managing right now, assuming it was being operated by someone moderately competent. It's not state of the art gear they need, but halfway capable operators.
I do wonder if this is the side-effect of the neoliberal right wing tendency to see workers as dispensible, interchangeable drones, whose expertise is irrelevant. After all, since so many of them seem to perceive experts as part of the problem, why on earth WOULD they hire an expert sound or video person? Far better to find someone with the "correct" political views and untainted by contact with the establishment.
They are subject to OFCOM's rules on due impartiality and due accuracy.
Section five: Due impartiality and due accuracy
This section of the Broadcasting Code relates to the concept ofwww.ofcom.org.uk
“Due” is an important qualification to the concept of impartiality. Impartiality itself means not favouring one side over another. “Due” means adequate or appropriate to the subject and nature of the programme. So “due impartiality” does not mean an equal division of time has to be given to every view, or that every argument and every facet of every argument has to be represented. The approach to due impartiality may vary according to the nature of the subject, the type of programme and channel, the likely expectation of the audience as to content, and the extent to which the content and approach is signalled to the audience. Context, as defined in Section two: Harm and offence of the Code, is important.
I am sure he knows the problems are deeper than anything connected to the equipment, he's just taking the piss, it's the McCoy way.He thinks their sound problems are down to a lack of "state of the art sound equipment"?
Given the paranoid mindset that seems to dominate gammon thought, I can't believe that they won't be trying to filter out dangerous leftie liberal types...I suspect they were more motivated to find someone who was cheap more than any other criteria
unless they did hire leftie liberal types who are sabotaging itGiven the paranoid mindset that seems to dominate gammon thought, I can't believe that they won't be trying to filter out dangerous leftie liberal types...
I do hope that idea takes root. The pogroms would be legendary.unless they did hire leftie liberal types who are sabotaging it
They'll be fine, especially with Dacre taking over Ofcom.
That isn't guaranteed, the interview panel appears to have turned him down, it's reported that the competition is to be re-run.
Paul Dacre and Ofcom: What's going on?
The contest to be the regulator's next boss is being re-run amid concerns over the PM's preferred candidate.www.bbc.co.uk
And non union i would guess.I suspect they were more motivated to find someone who was cheap more than any other criteria
That's implied from cheapAnd non union i would guess.
Not the sharpest tool....
Not the sharpest tool....