attention seeking and a poltical agenda yes i agree, mine is to ensure all those involved with the murder of Ian are dealt with
and you legitimate proposeals for doign so in a manner which withstands public scruntany and also peer review please.
in detail.
but as an anarchist i have no faith in the likes of the ippc
logical fallacy: I'm this so i believe this, and if you don't then you aren't one of us.
you being an anarchist doesn't give you mutual exclusivity to having little faith in state archtecture. indeed other than informing your poltics inside of that architecture it provides, seemingly in your individual case rather than as a general rule, a way for you to 'stand out' and differentiate yourself from your peers.
seems to me to be wearing a label rather like some wear dior. Fashion statment is it nathan?
this is just a cul de sac of nowhere
agreed but then conversations with those who disagree with your eeyore viewpoint tend to be circlar nonsense which derails threads as once again the mighty defender of the peoples: enumbers.
joining forces with other vangards is much the same cul de sac of nowhere is this distastful to point out these fact hold view a point about the murder of Ian
not at all i'm clearly pointing out distaste about people using the death for their poltical ends.
the supposed vangards which you allude are entirely different groups who aren't really associated other than by the entirely fictious merger in your own head.
in attempting to use the death to be another tool in your personal arsenal to attack your political opponents which you beleive to be wrong you are guilty of doing precisely what you claim these other groups are. and by extension you are equally, by your own standard here, gulity of policising the death for your own ends.
is it the fact it is myself that has pointed out this information
you haven't just provided information tho have you to say as such is deliberately dishonest. for the reasons already stated.
one is not giveing info on a wire where police and others read
I think if you are going to use such thinly veiled language to hide you implication you had better back that up with irrifuteable evidence or withdraw the comment. nether of which you have in the past or judging by the continuation of your stance on this issue you seem willing to do.
but those who know me also trust me
ah the old troll of i've received lot's of pm's of support, remixed.
old shit trolling tactic is old and shit.
GarfieldLeChat your actions are as just distastful and have been to de-rail the topic
dearailing by asking you to stay on topic and not attempt to politicse the death to suit your own aims...
right-o...
while pointing the finger at myself
if you wish to not be accused then simply stop doing it.
a spade is sometimes just a spade.
ill make it clear i desire very much for the truth of The Murder of Ian to come out
well firstly you'd have to prove catigorically this was a murder. secondly you'd have to involve yourself at a greater level than making wild accustations about poltical groups you dislike on bulletin boards.
but justice in a state of capitil will be a long time comeing..
if at all, however it means nothing in terms of your actions.
I'd retract or stfu if i were you...
