ska invita
back on the other side
I'm sure the argument in the Shallows is a good one, and has much truth, but I think Freedom being primarily a newspaper with news items and analysis, it is well suited to the web, and occasional longer pieces can compliment those shorter items. Like many small-circulation presses, the amount of work that goes into producing and writing them, compared to how many people in fact read it has become very unbalanced. I get the impression anarchist articles do pretty well on the web, particularly relative to the scale of the anarchist movement in the UK.You are possibly right, but I would ask what is the depth of those readers attachment to the ideas therein? Will it be any more than the attachment felt when watching a dancing cat? This might sound flippant but the internet encourages fragmentation, dissipation, indeed distraction. I am influenced here by books such as Nicholas Carr's The Shallows on how the internet changes the way we think read & remember. Not the type of debate suited to the virtual format, but there you have it. The continued existence of multiple high production value magazines on the high street/in supermarkets tells me that the printed word is not dead, yet.
Personally I struggle to retain information I have read from books as much as any other source