Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Footballer Marcus Rashford fights for free school meals

It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personally
Oh, I'm absolutely with you on that. This is one of the most shameful things I've seen in a very long time. Having to be forced to feed poor kids at a time of crisis then letting your cronies make some fucking huge profit by literally taking food away from hungry children. I'd string the fuckers up personally. Absolutely fucking despicable. :mad:
 
The best reaction to this would be to post that picture of the box up each and every time someone positively mentions outsourcing, privatization, PFI, internal markets, the need to involve private expertize to "fix" wasteful government or basically any of the nonsense that has wrecked this country's economy over the past forty years.

It sums the situation up better than any well-written article, any impassioned speech, or in-depth report that I've seen or heard.
 
The Tories would rather keep them 'just about' fed, that is in their view the correct impulse rather than to be seen as too 'generous' and 'rewarding failure' by adequately feeding hungry kids. The best part for them is that they can also profit from the misery they have caused whilst buffing themselves up that they are the workers/strivers/innovators, the ones with the moral fibre to 'make it' by e.g. exploiting hungry desperate families.
 
Last edited:
I can't help but notice how every single one of these so-called food hampers contains a tin of Heinz Baked Beans
 
Delivered by Morrisons for £30

ErixlMUXAAswLDB
There's a veggie option as well
 
The best reaction to this would be to post that picture of the box up each and every time someone positively mentions outsourcing, privatization, PFI, internal markets, the need to involve private expertize to "fix" wasteful government or basically any of the nonsense that has wrecked this country's economy over the past forty years.

Let’s be honest. A lot of folk are less likely to be outraged about their money being funnelled into the pockets of Compass bosses and shareholders than they would be if the story was about feckless types pissing direct payments up the wall rather than using the scheme to feed their kids.

You are right about the need to highlight what’s happening here. The problem is that our collective capacity to call this out, to demand action, to force the government and its private sector pals onto the defensive has dimmed. A lot of people seem to be resigned to it. It’s become normalised. It’s become so embedded that some people just assume it’s normal and what the private sector does. Not just in terms of school dinners either; in every facet of the economy and our lives. See for example PPE contracts during the pandemic, see our public services, see the fabric on which communities fucked over rely on etc etc

Another shining achievement of neoliberalism and its hegemony over lives.
 
I can't help but notice how every single one of these so-called food hampers contains a tin of Heinz Baked Beans

These for sure aren't Heinz, though I've seen quite a few pics with the Fray Bentos Meatballs aswell.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-01-12 at 19.23.52.png
    Screen Shot 2021-01-12 at 19.23.52.png
    859.5 KB · Views: 14
They tend not to issue it as it’s perishable and they need to cater for everyone
I got that and spam in my April/may govt shielding boxes...


I'm due another this week if all the referrals happen :facepalm:

But I've just finished the typhoo from the last one., So it wasn't all bad. The tins of meaty stuff is going to somewhere useful once shielding stops again.

There was properly odd stuff in the boxes! A litre of burger king scrambled egg mix with a same day use by date; shedloads of cheap white carbs I can't eat, mouldy carrots and iirc a few biscuits
.

I will l update you all on what the next delight contains, if it happens, even though it's not fsm related exactly...
 
Last edited:
Some people will no doubt spend it on booze and fags but even so this argument is outdated Victorian moralising at its worst My eldest daughter (who doesn't currently work) and her husband have 2 small children. My son-in-law's employer doesn't dictate how he spends his salary or give him part of it as food vouchers to stop him spending it on things they don't approve of. They just hand over the money and leave it at that. Why should benefit recipients be treated any differently and trusted less? The state can and should encourage good parenting and penalise bad but the benefit system is not the mechanism by which this should be achieved.

Absolutely. Also, just giving people random food and presumably expecting them to be grateful is wrong. I was just posting because I was curious whether they had tried to explain or justify the pointless insertion of a profiteering business between the funding and intended recipients.
 
Some of these pics on social media must be fake, surely?
This one, for example:
View attachment 248582

You'd think it would be cheaper to give a kid a whole onion that to pay someone to chop onions into quarters and wrap them in cling film. Similarly opening tins of tuna and decanting them into cash bags.

Who even knows though. Nothing's so awful that it's beneath the standards of outsourcing companies.
 
The company says the cost is actually £10.50 and not £30.


So, teuchter, you're saying that what was offered was totally adequate and you don't care if children starve to death?
Even at £10.50 (assuming its true) there's still a markup of 200% (even more since caterers will get bulk discounts) and I can't believe distribution doubles the cost either. Two further points. Firstly as a father of 4 I can assure you that wouldn't have fed any of mine for very long when they were little (especially Son who could eat like a carthorse). I wouldn't think that's acceptable for mine so I don't think anyone else should accept it either. Secondly apparently the woman who started this was entitled to £30 worth of food vouchers which she hasn't got. She's got £5.22 worth of stuff, Chartwell's have got £5.28 (more than her) and she has been fiddled out of £19.50. Whichever way you try and gloss over it, cheating kids out of meals is about as low as you can get.
 
From the BBC.


I honestly don't remember the voucher scheme from the first lockdown; is this a good thing?
It was a bit fiddly - the school have to email a voucher, then you'd have to go to the voucher website and put in a code, select a supermarket, then they email you another voucher to take to the supermarket. It wasn't all supermarkets - no Aldi or Lidl iirc - and you have to use it at a checkout rather than self service or online.

I had an email from my kid's school this evening saying they're no longer doing the hampers and will be switching to vouchers, but it's a very last minute decision so please give them a few days. And if your child is expecting a free lunch in school tomorrow please send a packed lunch if you can as they're not sure what the food situation will be.
 
Also, the entitlement to free lunches seems to be for everyone who gets infant universal school meals (like me as I have a 6 year old) as well as those who get income based free school meals. When the school was offering hampers of food you needed to go and collect I didn't ask for one as we don't need it, but if they're offering vouchers I will take one. I wonder if the whole hamper idea was due to them wanting to keep the take up as low as possible.
 
Back
Top Bottom