Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personallyWhen it's just for the plebs though, why bother?
It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personallyWhen it's just for the plebs though, why bother?
Oh, I'm absolutely with you on that. This is one of the most shameful things I've seen in a very long time. Having to be forced to feed poor kids at a time of crisis then letting your cronies make some fucking huge profit by literally taking food away from hungry children. I'd string the fuckers up personally. Absolutely fucking despicable.It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personally
But when you look at the fuckwits running the government, do you think any of the wrote a spec for the meals?It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personally
probably the most nutritious meal in a can you can get tbfI can't help but notice how every single one of these so-called food hampers contains a tin of Heinz Baked Beans
There's a veggie option as wellDelivered by Morrisons for £30
The best reaction to this would be to post that picture of the box up each and every time someone positively mentions outsourcing, privatization, PFI, internal markets, the need to involve private expertize to "fix" wasteful government or basically any of the nonsense that has wrecked this country's economy over the past forty years.
It should be a fucking legal requirement or at the very least a contractual obligation. I’d chuck the bosses in jail, personally
They tend not to issue it as it’s perishable and they need to cater for everyoneThere’s not even any meat.
It makes sense. No corn beef or some such.They tend not to issue it as it’s perishable and they need to cater for everyone
I can't help but notice how every single one of these so-called food hampers contains a tin of Heinz Baked Beans
I got that and spam in my April/may govt shielding boxes...They tend not to issue it as it’s perishable and they need to cater for everyone
There’s not even any meat.
So that hamper is good value in that case then?Skipping meat for a meal won't kill you.
So that hamper is good value in that case then?
Skipping meat for a meal won't kill you.
Some people will no doubt spend it on booze and fags but even so this argument is outdated Victorian moralising at its worst My eldest daughter (who doesn't currently work) and her husband have 2 small children. My son-in-law's employer doesn't dictate how he spends his salary or give him part of it as food vouchers to stop him spending it on things they don't approve of. They just hand over the money and leave it at that. Why should benefit recipients be treated any differently and trusted less? The state can and should encourage good parenting and penalise bad but the benefit system is not the mechanism by which this should be achieved.
What’s your point?
Some of these pics on social media must be fake, surely?
This one, for example:
View attachment 248582
That meat isn't a necessary component of a meal, and not providing meat is not in itself a crime. It's healthier to eat little or no meat, providing the other components of your diet are good.
Was just coming here to see if their private school meals had been posted yet, a few more:
probably similarWould be interesting to know what they charge for these compared to state school meals.
Even at £10.50 (assuming its true) there's still a markup of 200% (even more since caterers will get bulk discounts) and I can't believe distribution doubles the cost either. Two further points. Firstly as a father of 4 I can assure you that wouldn't have fed any of mine for very long when they were little (especially Son who could eat like a carthorse). I wouldn't think that's acceptable for mine so I don't think anyone else should accept it either. Secondly apparently the woman who started this was entitled to £30 worth of food vouchers which she hasn't got. She's got £5.22 worth of stuff, Chartwell's have got £5.28 (more than her) and she has been fiddled out of £19.50. Whichever way you try and gloss over it, cheating kids out of meals is about as low as you can get.The company says the cost is actually £10.50 and not £30.
Rashford: Free school meals firm apologises over small parcel
Marcus Rashford says "we must do better" after raising concerns about free school meals packages.www.bbc.co.uk
So, teuchter, you're saying that what was offered was totally adequate and you don't care if children starve to death?
It was a bit fiddly - the school have to email a voucher, then you'd have to go to the voucher website and put in a code, select a supermarket, then they email you another voucher to take to the supermarket. It wasn't all supermarkets - no Aldi or Lidl iirc - and you have to use it at a checkout rather than self service or online.From the BBC.
I honestly don't remember the voucher scheme from the first lockdown; is this a good thing?