The Addams Family this avo.
Hardly a scary horror movie, I know, but deffo seasonal
That has been acknowledged at the first mention.Whereas I like The Addams Family films (first one much better imo though), they are about as much a horror film as Casper if we’re honest
Watched this on Monday evening as a Halloween warm up and by God you're right about Raul Julia. What a loss - only a year after the film came outWatched the AF Values yday, which doesn't look/feel as good at the first, but I was laughing my arse off way more. Christina Ricci was the standout, but Raul Julia - fuck, why does this man have to be dead? He should still be alive and be the biggest film star in the world. I'm gonna have to work my way through his film history. Huston was great too, even the kid who played Pugsley. Didn't like Lloyd so much - he was better playing not-quite Fester last time.
I only know the remake with Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell and David Tennant from 2011. I thought that was one of the very few modern horror remakes which worked but for a horror film it had a (noticeably) large budget, certainly far larger than the original.Fright Night on Shudder is a decent remake/reimagining/reboot. It's an anthology series but really quite entertaining, if noticeably low budget.
Some surprisingly recognisable actors in their too.
That one is "fully" a horror film.I'd forgotten about Fright Night. Even if it's not fully a horror film, it certainly deserves a mention in this thread for this shot alone, which still gives me the chills...
I keep seeing people saying horror films aren’t horror films. Why is this? Is their definition of horror narrower than mine?I'd forgotten about Fright Night. Even if it's not fully a horror film, it certainly deserves a mention in this thread for this shot alone, which still gives me the chills...
That's a misunderstanding of the purpose of genre, though I see this a lot now on social media and forums, where people think everything is a matter of personal opinion and all opinions are of equal value.Well, for me anything that might be seen as a hybrid or mixed genre, such as comedy horror films or teen horror films, are not strictly horror films per se. I don't mean that in a diminishing way; incidentally. But they are not strictly speaking in the same category as a film which only purpose is to scare, chill or disturb you.
I'm a big fan of comedy horrors, so much so that I see them as a separate genre rather than a subgenre.
I only know the remake with Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell and David Tennant from 2011. I thought that was one of the very few modern horror remakes which worked but for a horror film it had a (noticeably) large budget, certainly far larger than the original.
Is there a new tv series as well ?
AndHaven't read this thread, but...
Some of the films I return to again and again as I love them are:
Lods more I've forgotten/can't bring to mind.
- The Wicker Man [1973]
- Martin [1976/77 depending on who you ask] the supposed 'forgotten' Romero Vampire film
- The Thing [1982]
- The Shining [1980 ]
- A Clockwork Orange [1971]
- Psycho [1960]
- The Silence of the Lambs [1991]
- Manhunter [1986]
These films represent a cracking weekend in front of the TV
Creep (Patrick Brice, 2014)
Another film that was sitting there on Netflix. I tried it and found I hated it and switched it off after 15 minutes or so. It’s about a neurotic “creepy” guy who is lax with personal space and too forward with embarrassing details. It felt uncomfortable, voyeuristic and almost exploitative even though it’s obviously fiction. But then I thought if this film has had such a strong affect on me it must be up to something, at the very least I realised that watching meant being unable to take my eyes off it. So (much later) I went back to it.
It’s a found footage film, again minimising cinematic artifice. Instead of substituting the poking and prodding of cinematic artifice with the plain poking and prodding of jump scares like many found footage films do it is a stripped-down character study. Two blokes with a camera.
If you’ve seen it, you know how it pans out. The creepy guy is really a serial killer and not a vulnerable odd ball (breathe a sigh of relief). The film is about ensnaring the protagonist while getting him to create a video diary of his own last few days as a kind of trophy (just saying that out loud – wow what a brilliant idea for a film). The second half of the film has some well-made spooky sequences and it’s a film that delivers more than it promises as a dirt cheap found footage flick. But what made me have to go for a walk around the block was the thought of a psychopath presenting as a needy neurotic. That would totally ensnare me. I think it’s interesting from a psychology point of view. Both in reality and in fiction, psychopaths are usually low in neuroticism, so it seems as if the creep is 100% ingenuine in the first half of the film and what is really being expressed is an uncomplicated desire to destroy and consume someone else’s identity. The real horror is the disguised cynical intent. Watch it a second time and watch Mark Duplass’s steely gaze behind all the antics.
In the sequel he is very much both a neurotic and a psychopath, so he is no longer a erm… rabbit in wolf’s clothing but more a rabbit-wolf hybrid. That unfortunately takes the edge off, but the sequel has its own awkward comedy charm and if anything is a better watch.
I watched that last week, having completely misremembered the reviews. You're being too generous.Put the Nun on this avo. Complete excrement
I think I'm going to try this, never heard of it before. Three endings?I’ve just joined the 1408 gang. Definitely worth it even if the ending (I got the directors cut version) makes Olins behaviour even more ludicrous.
Go for the directors cut one if you can! Which is not the one on youtube. But it is the most common on DVD, so any good rip....I think I'm going to try this, never heard of it before. Three endings?
I saw the British Creep at Peckham multiplex when I was 16. It was the best cinema experience I think I've ever had, completely raucous, everyone shouting at the screen and jumping in unison.I much prefer the 2004 British film Creep, set on the Underground. Brilliantly cheap and nasty even if you can see the ending coming a mile off.
Also, a thread about horror films and none of youse have mentioned the Wishmaster films?
Yes, several, several times. It's still rubbish.Has anyone mentioned Event Horizon?
Laurence Fishburne was excellent in it.
Put the Nun on this avo. Complete excrement