Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Favourite Horror Film

I’ve just joined the 1408 gang. Definitely worth it even if the ending (I got the directors cut version) makes Olins behaviour even more ludicrous.
 
The Addams Family this avo.

Hardly a scary horror movie, I know, but deffo seasonal 👇
h4qI89X.gif

Watched the AF Values yday, which doesn't look/feel as good at the first, but I was laughing my arse off way more. Christina Ricci was the standout, but Raul Julia - fuck, why does this man have to be dead? He should still be alive and be the biggest film star in the world. I'm gonna have to work my way through his film history. Huston was great too, even the kid who played Pugsley. Didn't like Lloyd so much - he was better playing not-quite Fester last time.
 
Whereas I like The Addams Family films (first one much better imo though), they are about as much a horror film as Casper if we’re honest :D
That has been acknowledged at the first mention. ;)
It's still connected to the genre, being essentially a horror comedy.
 
Last edited:
Watched the AF Values yday, which doesn't look/feel as good at the first, but I was laughing my arse off way more. Christina Ricci was the standout, but Raul Julia - fuck, why does this man have to be dead? He should still be alive and be the biggest film star in the world. I'm gonna have to work my way through his film history. Huston was great too, even the kid who played Pugsley. Didn't like Lloyd so much - he was better playing not-quite Fester last time.
Watched this on Monday evening as a Halloween warm up and by God you're right about Raul Julia. What a loss - only a year after the film came out :(
 
Fright Night on Shudder is a decent remake/reimagining/reboot. It's an anthology series but really quite entertaining, if noticeably low budget.

Some surprisingly recognisable actors in their too.
 
Fright Night on Shudder is a decent remake/reimagining/reboot. It's an anthology series but really quite entertaining, if noticeably low budget.

Some surprisingly recognisable actors in their too.
I only know the remake with Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell and David Tennant from 2011. I thought that was one of the very few modern horror remakes which worked but for a horror film it had a (noticeably) large budget, certainly far larger than the original.

Is there a new tv series as well ?
 
Last edited:
I'd forgotten about Fright Night. Even if it's not fully a horror film, it certainly deserves a mention in this thread for this shot alone, which still gives me the chills... :cool:

fright-night-3-book.jpg
 
I'd forgotten about Fright Night. Even if it's not fully a horror film, it certainly deserves a mention in this thread for this shot alone, which still gives me the chills... :cool:

fright-night-3-book.jpg
That one is "fully" a horror film.
 
I'd forgotten about Fright Night. Even if it's not fully a horror film, it certainly deserves a mention in this thread for this shot alone, which still gives me the chills... :cool:

fright-night-3-book.jpg
I keep seeing people saying horror films aren’t horror films. Why is this? Is their definition of horror narrower than mine?
 
Well, for me anything that might be seen as a hybrid or mixed genre, such as comedy horror films or teen horror films, are not strictly horror films per se. I don't mean that in a diminishing way, incidentally. But they are not strictly speaking in the same category as a film which only purpose is to scare, chill or disturb you.

I'm a big fan of comedy horrors, so much so that I see them as a separate genre rather than a subgenre.
 
Last edited:
Well, for me anything that might be seen as a hybrid or mixed genre, such as comedy horror films or teen horror films, are not strictly horror films per se. I don't mean that in a diminishing way; incidentally. But they are not strictly speaking in the same category as a film which only purpose is to scare, chill or disturb you.

I'm a big fan of comedy horrors, so much so that I see them as a separate genre rather than a subgenre.
That's a misunderstanding of the purpose of genre, though I see this a lot now on social media and forums, where people think everything is a matter of personal opinion and all opinions are of equal value.

Horror consists of many sub-genres, including horror comedy. It's not that being part of a horror subgenre disqualifies a film from being part of of the genre, the opposite is true and every horror film is part of a sub-genre of horror. Also, many films are genre hybrids, with makes them part of several genres, it's not an either/or decision (Alien is horror and science fiction). The point of genre is to quickly communicate a mutually understood set of conventions, to explain what type of film/music/ narrative it is in one word. If everybody makes up their own definition, then "genre" loses its purpose.

While Fright Night has a comedic tone, the horror elements are played completely straight. It's not a spoof or parody, it's a horror film which also includes comedy. Like An American Werewolf in London, which I consider one of the greatest horror films of all time.
 
Last edited:
I would say a film is not a horror film if it is fundamentally upbeat which the Adams Family films are IIRC even if they are obviously horror related. Same with One Cut of the Dead which I saw recently which is absolutely playing with classic horror themes but its overall tone is a good feel film.

People talking about "post-horror" can go play with a flesh eating ghoul, though.
 
I only know the remake with Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell and David Tennant from 2011. I thought that was one of the very few modern horror remakes which worked but for a horror film it had a (noticeably) large budget, certainly far larger than the original.

Is there a new tv series as well ?

Yes, on Shudder, it was made in 2019 I believe. I didn't know it existed and thought it was just the original when I first saw it was on the channel.

I think it's an in house Shudder exclusive, it's worth a watch though obviously some stories work better than others.
 
Creep (Patrick Brice, 2014)

Another film that was sitting there on Netflix. I tried it and found I hated it and switched it off after 15 minutes or so. It’s about a neurotic “creepy” guy who is lax with personal space and too forward with embarrassing details. It felt uncomfortable, voyeuristic and almost exploitative even though it’s obviously fiction. But then I thought if this film has had such a strong affect on me it must be up to something, at the very least I realised that watching meant being unable to take my eyes off it. So (much later) I went back to it.

It’s a found footage film, again minimising cinematic artifice. Instead of substituting the poking and prodding of cinematic artifice with the plain poking and prodding of jump scares like many found footage films do it is a stripped-down character study. Two blokes with a camera.

If you’ve seen it, you know how it pans out. The creepy guy is really a serial killer and not a vulnerable odd ball (breathe a sigh of relief). The film is about ensnaring the protagonist while getting him to create a video diary of his own last few days as a kind of trophy (just saying that out loud – wow what a brilliant idea for a film). The second half of the film has some well-made spooky sequences and it’s a film that delivers more than it promises as a dirt cheap found footage flick. But what made me have to go for a walk around the block was the thought of a psychopath presenting as a needy neurotic. That would totally ensnare me. I think it’s interesting from a psychology point of view. Both in reality and in fiction, psychopaths are usually low in neuroticism, so it seems as if the creep is 100% ingenuine in the first half of the film and what is really being expressed is an uncomplicated desire to destroy and consume someone else’s identity. The real horror is the disguised cynical intent. Watch it a second time and watch Mark Duplass’s steely gaze behind all the antics.

In the sequel he is very much both a neurotic and a psychopath, so he is no longer a erm… rabbit in wolf’s clothing but more a rabbit-wolf hybrid. That unfortunately takes the edge off, but the sequel has its own awkward comedy charm and if anything is a better watch.

I much prefer the 2004 British film Creep, set on the Underground. Brilliantly cheap and nasty even if you can see the ending coming a mile off. :D

Also, a thread about horror films and none of youse have mentioned the Wishmaster films? :mad:
 
The British and American Creeps are completely different beasts; I like them both.

The American Creep I thought it was superb- one of my all-time favourite found footage films. Ridiculously good performance by the main character.

I was very pleased with Creep 2 as well- a very worthy sequel, thanks to the unexpected demeanour of the would-be victim.
 
Just finished a rewatch of Tales of Hallowe'en and enjoyed it way more than first time. An anthology film with ten segments, the last also providing a kind of wrapper. Some are a bit shit, but the good outweigh the bad. Amazon Prime.
 
Terrifier was quite good. Prefer Art in the anthology format of All Hallow's Eve though. Watched the sequel to that y'day and he wasn't even in it! He's on the fucking DVD cover!

Put the Nun on this avo. Complete excrement
h4qI89X.gif
 
Regarding the British Creep (2004), I thought the first section was wonderfully atmospheric and there really needs to be more horror films set in the London Underground, but I thought it was one of those films that gets less interesting when you see the monster(s).
 
I much prefer the 2004 British film Creep, set on the Underground. Brilliantly cheap and nasty even if you can see the ending coming a mile off. :D

Also, a thread about horror films and none of youse have mentioned the Wishmaster films? :mad:
I saw the British Creep at Peckham multiplex when I was 16. It was the best cinema experience I think I've ever had, completely raucous, everyone shouting at the screen and jumping in unison.

Bit disappointed when I watched it again on dvd.
 
Nightmare Before Christmas and Trick 'R' Treat lined up for tmoz, as per usual
h4qI89X.gif
Christmas horror films start Sunday night, with Bill Goldberg in Santas's Slay "Hoes, hoes, hoes!!"
OfZtxtT.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom