I never have the patience for youtube videos, I prefer podcasts, so won't watch this. They certainly are in a minority of those who think this is a good film, the movie got slated. I wrote a little about
Halloween Ends here:
Halloween Ends, the last film in David Gordon Green‘s Halloween trilogy, which feels like he lost interest in the whole thing along the way. For 90 minutes this is a film which has almost nothing to do with Halloween (in terms of plot this is closer to Carpenter‘s Christine), introducing a new...
www.urban75.net
David Gordon Green started out as a filmmaker of well regarded indie movies, then he made a few Hollywood comedies and dramas to mixed success and now has turned his attention to horror franchises. He certainly is a more skilled filmmaker than many of those behind previous
Halloween sequels, it's just that with
Halloween Ends he didn't seem interested in making a
Halloween sequel. He also never seems to have grasped what is great about the original
Halloween. So why didn't he make that film without any connection to
Halloween instead ? The film is frustrating for
Halloween fans as anything
Halloween (Michael Myers, Laurie Strode) is pushed to the sidelines. It also doesn't work as the "revenge of the oppressed" horror film in the tradition of
Christine, Willard or
Carrie, he wants to make because eventually this has to tie into Halloween, which isn't suited to that type of film. Even if this had been a stand alone about the character of Corey Cunningham, it probably wouldn't have been a very good film of its type. With
H20, there already exists a superior
Halloween sequel which brought back Laurie Strode to deal with her PTSD in a more complex and realistic manner than the plot line Green conceived for her over the last 3 movies.