marty21
One on one? You're crazy.
I assume they cleaned the train when it arrived, or at least checked the carriages, but there is a quick turnaround at Liverpool StThat is proper catch 22
I assume they cleaned the train when it arrived, or at least checked the carriages, but there is a quick turnaround at Liverpool StThat is proper catch 22
That is proper catch 22
I have to admit I have "kept trains in service" for these reasons.....(i.e better to get people home with a bit of inconvenience / smell rather than cancel a train)
Some dirty bastard shat a big one (must have been holding it for a week I reckon) , on a North London line train at Willesden Jct one hot afternoon. No option but to remove for "special cleaning" - any attempt at picking that up would have been traumatic. Did warn the depot though it was coming their way. Nver - thank God - seen shit on a train window though. Other things - yes - (which I wont go into)
Just a bit busy - but looking at the TRUST reports for the last 24 hours - punctuality on Manchester - Bham looks pretty decent - a few mins down in the am - but often , arriving early. ....had I the IT skills , I would send this on to you.I've done some adding up on my spreadsheet that I use to track my train journey times, and out of 168 journeys to/from work this year so far, a whopping 82% of them were late arriving at the destination station. Useless bloody train company.
I'm currently running 30 minutes late so the stats may not be too accurate.Just a bit busy - but looking at the TRUST reports for the last 24 hours - punctuality on Manchester - Bham looks pretty decent - a few mins down in the am - but often , arriving early. ....had I the IT skills , I would send this on to you.
That's a rubbish thing to happen on your journey home.so I hit some dead stopped traffic on my way home after a pleasant hour long commute on the highway proper and this was the source
good news is, that lake is our drinking supply! mmmm....used condoms, rotten food, great fun to think about. not too sure it's much worse than what seeps in from road runoff but eugh, the thought is awful.
That's a rubbish thing to happen on your journey home.
Bloody miseryguts, the pair of you.I refuse to even laugh at that pun
16 minutes late. signal failure at sunningdale.
Almost a Reggie Perrin comment - self 15 late , air con fast train cancelled from Blackfriars - back on a boiling , all stations non-air con 319. (Packed) .....thank God only a few more months to go.
16 minutes late. signal failure at sunningdale.
and why does the aircon on sw trains have to be either knacked or bloody freezing? :hmph:
None of the the SW trains I get has aircon. Last remaining commuter trains without it, apparently. Go, SW trains!
16 minutes late. signal failure at sunningdale.
and why does the aircon on sw trains have to be either knacked or bloody freezing? :hmph:
not yet - but they seem to be out of Paddington (which I only use occasionally) maybe QueenOfGoths ?Anyone experiencing speed restrictions because of the hot weather yet?
Anyone experiencing speed restrictions because of the hot weather yet?
not yet - but they seem to be out of Paddington (which I only use occasionally) maybe QueenOfGoths ?
I don't know about the other ones, but all the Southern ones I know of do have aircon.
So is the idea that you derail more slowly?
I don't understand it.
e2a: damn you Roadie - I was responding to QoGgy
Yes, a softer landing is the aim.
I think the main reason is to avoid damaging the track further and causing an incident, as Network Rail say that slower trains exert less force on the track.
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/timetables-and-travel/delays-explained/summer-weather.aspx
davesgcr will know more about the rationale for slowing services down in hot weather.
I seeeeeeeee, such a shame you can't hang your heads out the windows in this weather, get a bit of breeze