Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

EU Reading List

Absolutely key, really informed my thinking on the EU is Guglielmo Carched's For another Europe: A Class Analysis of European Economic Integration. Don't have an electromic copy i'm afraid. Here's a serious review from Historical Materialism journal though.

That looks quite heavy :( Perhaps that's unavoidable - or shouldn't be avoided - but i doubt I'll get the time/space to get through that one. We're talking bite size chunks before bed, on the bus and whilst Cbeebies is on...
 
That looks quite heavy :( Perhaps that's unavoidable - or shouldn't be avoided - but i doubt I'll get the time/space to get through that one. We're talking bite size chunks before bed, on the bus and whilst Cbeebies is on...
In that case go for the Streeck recommended above then. After Ellen Meiksins Woods he's one of the clearest jargon free writers i can think of.
 
Varoufakis's account of the current European crisis, which goes back to how the EU (ETA: or rather its predecessors the ECSC and then EEC) fitted in to the Bretton Wood system after World War II and traces some of the institutional/anti-democratic tendencies back to its origins is very readable. The fact that his analysis, which is framed in pragmatic neo-keynesian terms rather than being based on a deeper Marxist critique of capitalism, sits so far outside the mainstream terms of the debate on Europe is also telling about how fucked the whole project is.
 
You after articles as well? Stuff like this?

How the EU pushed France to reforms of labour law

The current struggle in France over labour law reforms is not just between the Government and trade unions – a European battle is waged. The attacks on social rights stem in no small part from the web of EU-rules dubbed 'economic governance', invented to impose austerity policies on member states.

See also.
 
Last edited:
Here's versos left/internationalist reading list.

I've just remembered i have Perry Anderson's book on the eu, hang on:
The New Old World.

Anderson's The New Old World is a go to guide for anyone trying to understand the development of European Union and the overarching notion of a unified European identity. It takes into account this development from the Enlightenment up to the present. The New Old World offers a critical portrait of a continent now increasingly hailed as a moral and political example to the world at large.
 
Not much coming from the pro-eu side is there.
My understanding/framing of a world view, too - thanks for introducing him a few months back.

Streeck contributes to this round-up in the LRB - LRB · Where are we now?
Great line in T.J Clark's piece, and followed up by a point on immigration that is 100% central to the linking of the eu with the capitalist management of immigration (PR'ed to the remain side as freedom of movement) but rarely talked about:

Facebook, an American friend tells me, ‘has become an unbearable liberal wailing wall’

Conversations with young Southern European immigrants in London – one recently with a Bulgarian woman sticks in the mind – are a welcome reality check. They know all too well what the ‘free movement of labour’ means for people like them, and how much the discipline of the euro is responsible for driving them north. No lessons in the mechanics of wage suppression or Deutsche Bundesbank’s anti-Keynesianism are needed.
 
Bite sized chunks on a similar theme - I'd never heard of PERC before, but their blog has run a couple of interesting post-ref pieces. Contributor Will Davies references/acknowledges Streeck, & highlights this NLR article as crucial to understanding crisis - Wolfgang Streeck: The Crises of Democratic Capitalism. New Left Review 71, September-October 2011.

What sort of crisis is this?
Thoughts on the sociology of Brexit
PERC have hosted some really good public talks of late; I'm a big fan of what they're doing at Goldsmiths.:thumbs:
 
Not sure if this thread is really the place for it but I think this piece giving the view from the official Remain camp is worth reading. Not because it's particularly good (it isn't) but because it does give a picture of the views inside the liberal camp
 
Not sure if this thread is really the place for it but I think this piece giving the view from the official Remain camp is worth reading. Not because it's particularly good (it isn't) but because it does give a picture of the views inside the liberal camp

Will Straw, the executive director of Britain Stronger In Europe,... Straw was a former Labour parliamentary candidate. Stronger In’s head of strategy, Ryan Coetzee, had run the Liberal Democrat 2015 election campaign
That's such a recipe for success, I don't understand how they failed.
 
The thinking was that they just had to turn up. Hence the personnel not being that important.
Oh yeah, I just like how the article makes these sound like impeccable credentials for running a nation campaign. :D

Having now read the whole thing, every word of it made me even more convinced that a leave vote was the correct vote.
 
Not sure if this thread is really the place for it but I think this piece giving the view from the official Remain camp is worth reading. Not because it's particularly good (it isn't) but because it does give a picture of the views inside the liberal camp
I'm trying, really trying, to read that but dear old rafael is making it quite difficult.

Former Labour staffers, moderate refugees fleeing the hard-left takeover under Corbyn
 
Not sure if this thread is really the place for it but I think this piece giving the view from the official Remain camp is worth reading. Not because it's particularly good (it isn't) but because it does give a picture of the views inside the liberal camp

This is interesting:

But over the course of the campaign, the most senior remainers found collegiate sympathy in a shared world view. As one put it: “We were the pluralist, liberal, centrist force in British politics.” Pro-Europeanism became a proxy for the fusion of economic and social liberalism that had been a dominant philosophy of the political mainstream for a generation, although its proponents were scattered across partisan boundaries. These centrists were the ruling class of an unrecognised state – call it Remainia – whose people were divided between the Conservatives, Labour and Lib Dems; like a tribe whose homeland has been partitioned by some insouciant Victorian cartographer.

In the days when the politics of the fringe did not threaten their intellectual security, adherents of New Labour, the Lib Dems and “Cameroon” Conservatives had never seen themselves as a fellowship of moderation. Before Corbynite radicalism seized the left and Ukip’s vinegary nationalism suffused the right, debate was conducted in shades of difference within a broad consensus. But as the referendum approached, Stronger In became the informal party of defensive liberalism – the unpopulists – although that had never been the intention.
So there you have it, economic liberalism needs defending and needs defending by the EU. Well at least it is straightforward and unequivocal in its defence of the status quo.

Oh and Corbyn is a radical who has seized (not won, convinced, persuaded...) something called the left; the left which presumably could either be ignored or co-opted in happier times gone by.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Back
Top Bottom