David Clapson
Well-Known Member
In Berlin it was the thing to pop a firelighter on the tyre.
Talk of "bottle" is only to be expected from the toxic masculinity, macho posturing petrol head dinosaur motorist brigade.it’s now to do with bottle, just fed up of constant every day pavement parking
To save me the 180 seconds of googling, it would be great if you could post a link to the site from where you ordered them, please.i’ve just ordered a load of You Park Like A Cunt stickers to slap on the windscreen of pavement parkers. can’t wait to use them
amazonTo save me the 180 seconds of googling, it would be great if you could post a link to the site from where you ordered them, please.
I have a need
To save me the 180 seconds of googling, it would be great if you could post a link to the site from where you ordered them, please.
I have a need
The court heard how Mrs Pirali-Dashti had been travelling towards Brent Cross with her husband, Asghar Moradmand, when their Honda Civic bumped into Barrow’s Volkswagen Touareg.
Prosecutor Deanna Heer alleged that Barrow “lost his temper” following the minor collision and punched Mr Moradmand in the face.
Mrs Pirali-Dashti was standing in front of the defendant’s car on the phone to the police when Barrow knocked her to the ground, jurors heard.
Ms Heer said: “Then, as she lay there helpless, he drove over her causing severe crushing injuries from which she later died.”
Mrs Pirali-Dashti’s husband had been shouting for Barrow to stop as he drove forward, the Old Bailey heard.
Giving evidence, Barrow insisted it was an “accident”.
He told jurors: “I was starting to get scared. I didn’t go out to kill and murder someone.”
Asked if he was worried at the time that he might hit Mr Moradmand who stood near his wife in front of the car, the defendant said: “You do have concerns but I didn’t tell either of them to put themselves in a position in front of my car?
“You don’t put yourself in danger.”
He told jurors that he mistakenly thought the couple were “trying to pull a scam on me” so he just wanted to “move away”.
Cyclist 'jumped red light and killed pedestrian Peter McCombie'
A cyclist killed a 73-year-old pedestrian after riding through a red light, leaving him "bleeding" in the road, a court has heard.
Ms Heer said the lights had been "on red for over five seconds" but Mr Loka continued cycling and crashed into Mr McCombie.
She added: "As he lay on the road, bleeding and unconscious, the defendant - who had also fallen down - picked up his bike and cycled away, leaving others to call an ambulance for Mr
E-bike cyclist killed pedestrian while ‘travelling 10mph over speed limit’ in London, court told
At the time of the collision, the 32-year-old was travelling at speeds of 30mph on a road limited to 20mph, jurors were told.
I know there's a lot of love for e-bikes on these boards but there are tonnes of 'e-bikes' on the road where I live that are in fact electric motorbikes, largely delivery companies like Deliveroo etc.NB the second one of those is a motorcycle.
It's a cyclist with ideas above his station.NB the second one of those is a motorcycle.
They're everywhere. They're supposed to be pedal assisted (or is it motor assisted?) but there's videos all over YouTube of cyclists flying along at breakneck speeds without a single twist of the crank.I know there's a lot of love for e-bikes on these boards but there are tonnes of 'e-bikes' on the road where I live that are in fact electric motorbikes, largely delivel
I'm not too bothered about what you want to call motorcyclists. But it's good that you have finally realised that they are a lethal hazard, even at 30mph. The next step is to reflect on your own behaviour and start making some changes.It's a cyclist with ideas above his station.
They're cheating cyclists. No different to the drug-fuelled frenzy cyclists who attack pedestrians in the Rage De France.I'm not too bothered about what you want to call motorcyclists.
It's ok to murder people with your car, if you get into an argument with them, UK court decides.
Essex man cleared of murdering woman he 'accidentally' ran over with his car
A motorist has been cleared of murdering a woman who was crushed under his car following a minor collision, a court has heard.www.eppingforestguardian.co.uk
Even Daily Mail readers think it's disgusting -
View attachment 279778
There is a happy medium, where tolerance is upheld from all sides based on respect for others and the actions that may impact others in a negative way.Only when this tolerance and respect is broken should we key the cars. Big fucking multi panel scratches down to the primer . I speak as a medium ranking petrol head hereI guess we should also scratch them with keys and slash their tyres, as advocated by the warrior car-abolitionists here.
There is a happy medium, where tolerance is upheld from all sides based on respect for others and the actions that may impact others in a negative way.Only when this tolerance and respect is broken should we key the cars. Big fucking multi panel scratches down to the primer . I speak as a medium ranking petrol head here
Bring back the chariot, I say.Are you up for keying cyclists down to the blood if they aren't tolerant and respectful too?
Why did they go for manslaughter then?Perhaps the Daily Mail readers aren't aware of the full facts of the case. For example, the victim died of coronavirus in hospital, and that would be entirely unforeseen and unconnected with the defendant's act.
Are you up for keying cyclists down to the blood if they aren't tolerant and respectful too?
Because they were fucking idiots?Why did they go for manslaughter then?
Are you up for keying cyclists down to the blood if they aren't tolerant and respectful too?
i keyed a pavement parker last night. will see if they’re still there this evening.You know cars don't feel pain right?
I’m not surprised if the CPS were wary of trying to prove murder. They would need to prove that the driver intentionally wanted to hurt her, but he claims that he wasn’t aware that she was lying there. Manslaughter is much easier to go for, as you only need to show that he acted recklessly and negligently in a way that could have been foreseen to endanger life.Because they were fucking idiots?
The jury only get to decide if the defendant is guilty (in their view) of what they're charged with. They don't get to find them guilty of a lesser charge if they're not charged with one.
The CPS obviously fucked up. You can't blame the jury for that.
dunno why you doubt me. it’s very easy to do, much easier than putting the stickers i have on the car