Could try reporting it to the local council though Lambeth was accused of acting like North Korea when it removed one so stopped to leave them to slowly dwindle as the owners realised they were just showing where the selfish nobs live.Anyone know if there would be legal consequences for removing a banner from a resident’s fence opposite a large roundabout on a junction of two A roads? It’s illegally installed as it doesn’t have planning permission. And it’s a dangerous distraction to motorists and cyclists who should be concerned with keeping their eyes on the road of a fast and busy roundabout.
It’s also a NIMBY-sponsored banner objecting to a redesign of the roundabout to prevent the deaths of local children (whose school is on one corner) and cyclists/other pedestrians at the hands of careless idiots in cars and lorries.
Yep - almost like people don’t want their communities to be overrun by cars!! Strange how some insist of listening to a noisy minority.Thus far it's looking like every single council that made scrapping LTNs a primary election issue has lost.
Blimey, makes me glad I cycle as I would get in trouble if I was a driver as I rarely get more than four or five hours sleep a night. Might be good for those of us with ADHD as it may make it easier to get a disabled bus pass or funding for taxis through Access To Work.This is promising - blood tests to detect sleep deprivation in drivers.
Blood test for sleepy drivers could pave way for prosecutions
Exclusive: Research comes amid evidence that driving on less than five hours’ sleep is as dangerous as drink-drivingwww.theguardian.com
that’s shocking. He stopped briefly before deciding to go ahead and run her over anyway. I’m not keen on long sentences but a three year ban is inadequate - that should be permanent.
Just checked the driver’s Twitter account and amongst the whinging about train unions and the cricket tweets is a tweet that appears to be condoning the police knocking moped riders off their bikes.
Very good example of why paint isn’t infrastructure!They really shouldn't be swerving across a cycle lane. It's dangerous.
You just love to see it!
Yes, but none of that gives her the right to bash the car with her sticks!Quite aside from the moral duty to be patient, if it’s in the UK, I’m pretty sure she has the right of way and that car is obliged to simply follow behind her at her place. Wasn’t that a much publicised change to the Highway Code a few years back?
She’s being threatened by an aggressive man in control of a potentially deadly weapon. I don’t blame her in the slightest for taking an aggressive stance in response. It’s probably the wisest thing for her to do in the circumstances, because bullies don’t respect those who make themselves meek. If she’d moved off to the side, for example, she’d be at serious risk of being squished, if he was anything but perfectly accurate in his driving. And if she just carries on walking, who knows what violent action this aggressive man will escalate to? He’s basically given her no choice but to respond in kind.Yes, but none of that gives her the right to bash the car with her sticks!
Two very unpleasant people.
Fuck the car, she was right.Yes, but none of that gives her the right to bash the car with her sticks!
Two very unpleasant people.