You’re not over 50?Strangely only 1 for me, although if there was another EU referendum it’d be 2.
You’re not over 50?Strangely only 1 for me, although if there was another EU referendum it’d be 2.
Setting aside your recollections, which no-one cares about, you are defining "people who don't live within an easy public-transport commute of London" as an ethnicity, yes? Or are you about to backpedal on that?
Of course I'm not, but when you apply your learnings from past ethnic cleansings in your desire to forcibly depopulate the UK countryside you can't quite make your mind up whether you want to emulate Milosevic, or, by banning private ownership of cars, Kim Il-Sung.
The sole Tory councillor in Lambeth called LTNs ethnic cleansing! Bizarre what people result to when their right to drive everywhere is questioned.
Surely everyone can agree that comparing anything to ethnic cleansing is fucking stupid.
We should design where people live better so we aren’t so dependent on cars.
oH GOd! YOu arE JuST LIke THe KHmeR RouGE!!!
That's not what was proposed. You can't design personal transport out of rural living because the population density doesn't support sufficiently regular public transport.
I suggest you go back and read the thread from page 1.
Yeah, it’s just like the Holocaust right!
You are recommending that I take lessons from past ethnic cleansings, in order enact my favoured policies, but you are also saying that I don't want to apply them on an ethnic basis. I don't understand what your point is. You seem to have become confused. I mean I already knew that you were confused about how the policies work but now you want to bring ethnicity into the equation.Of course I'm not, but when you apply your learnings from past ethnic cleansings in your desire to forcibly depopulate the UK countryside you can't quite make your mind up whether you want to emulate Milosevic, or, by banning private ownership of cars, Kim Il-Sung.
Is throwing around comparisons to the Holocaust more or less offensive than jokes about alcoholism
LTNs are pure NIMBYism. Their sole purpose is to move traffic away from wealthy people's houses to anywhere else, regardless of the cost to the environment or other people's health. Of course there will also be LTNs in less wealthy areas, but that's merely a numbers game.The sole Tory councillor in Lambeth called LTNs ethnic cleansing! Bizarre what people result to when their right to drive everywhere is questioned.
LTNs are pure NIMBYism. Their sole purpose is to move traffic away from wealthy people's houses to anywhere else, regardless of the cost to the environment or other people's health. Of course there will also be LTNs in less wealthy areas, but that's merely a numbers game.
They increase pollution.Their purpose is to reduce car journeys & they work!
As mentioned before, they are slightly counter intuitive so can see why you’re struggling to understand them.
They increase pollution.
Council review reveals LTN scheme makes air pollution worse — The Consultation Institute
The level of a toxic car exhaust pollutant dropped across parts of south London following the scrapping of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTN), according to awww.consultationinstitute.org
BuRgErZWe should design where people live better so we aren’t so dependent on cars.
oH GOd! YOu arE JuST LIke THe KHmeR RouGE!!!
Wealthy country types who want to play at Cider with Rosie should accept that they can't expect to have the convenience of the city on their doorstep. If they need a Tescos ten minutes away move to a city rather than expecting the best of both worlds.That's not what was proposed. You can't design personal transport out of rural living because the population density doesn't support sufficiently regular public transport.
The same Tories you're lauding for introducing LTNsHaha, great “study” you’ve got there. How much didn’t Wandsworth council waste on putting LTNs in for a few weeks? Great leadership by the Tories there!
Or we could just drive there, as we've always done and always will because private cars aren't ever going away.Wealthy country types who want to play at Cider with Rosie should accept that they can't expect to have the convenience of the city on their doorstep. If they need a Tescos ten minutes away move to a city rather than expecting the best of both worlds.
Wealthy country types who want to play at Cider with Rosie should accept that they can't expect to have the convenience of the city on their doorstep. If they need a Tescos ten minutes away move to a city rather than expecting the best of both worlds.
The same Tories you're lauding for introducing LTNs
When did you last conversate with strangers who live beyond the M25? You should get out more lest your wild fantasies of life outside your bubble have you mistaken for a member of the out-of-touch liberal metropolitan elite.
If that's really is the case, doesn't that again prove that car owners are more important?It’s the one thing central government actual gets, I think it’s down to Andrew Gilligan tbh. Local Tories are too afraid of their selfish, reactionary , car owning voters to see it through.
To engage in conversation.Conversate?!
Conversate?!
To engage in conversation.
Possibly not a word you've heard, as it isn't part of the speak and spell vocabulary?
Travel broadens the mind. Go hire a Ford F-150 truck and cruise around America, you'll soon find someone who uses the word.