thank you for revealing your inner pedant
thank you for revealing your inner pedant
which, if you believe that the world has less than 30 years before it is fucked, is frankly worthless. You may get your street tidied up, but the planet would still be fucked, including your street.Given the current weakness of pro-working class politics, I'd be inclined to ask questions with a smaller/local/specific focus rather than ones couched in large/global/general terms.
What do you think the solution to the climate crisis is? What action needs to be taken? By whom?which, if you believe that the world has less than 30 years before it is fucked, is frankly worthless. You may get your street tidied up, but the planet would still be fucked, including your street.
Socialism. But if we need it in the next thirty years, we are fucked.What do you think the solution to the climate crisis is? What action needs to be taken? By whom?
No. But they are irrelevant if you think the world is about to end.Do you really think the working class are only concerned with litter? I think there's a whole lot more going on than that.
They weren't relevant to the point I was making.p.s. what about the other parts of my post you chose not to respond to?
Which we're unlikely to get even a hint of while austerity persists. It is unlikely we will get much progress on the environment either while living under the kind of austerity that allows production and environmental degradation to accelerate with all the consequences unequally distributed as much as the benefits are in the opposite direction. Going back to your earlier post perhaps it is the wrong approach to focus solely on the climate issue when socialism is what's required. There bound up. Even under capitalism a government could choose to end austerity by putting a shit ton into building a renewables based infrastructure, better public transport etcthat would as well as probably improve the climate sitiation help with unemployment , improve growth and all that bollocks. Whether they'd be able to get it done is another question but a strong anti-austerity movement (and hopefully a lot more ambitious than that) possibly with environmental concerns (most people have them but have more immediate needs) would help them push it through against the objections of the vested interests. There's more that can be done than either putting everything into the climate movement or waiting for full communism to save us.Socialism. But if we need it in the next thirty years, we are fucked.
Am I right in saying that the IWCA don't exist anymore?
Of course there is. But you still need to raise the issue, and if you are bound up in a methodology that will mean the issue is ignored, what do you do? Just go 'oh well, the method is all' or try and argue with people about why your priority should also be there priority?Which we're unlikely to get even a hint of while austerity persists. It is unlikely we will get much progress on the environment either while living under the kind of austerity that allows production and environmental degradation to accelerate with all the consequences unequally distributed as much as the benefits are in the opposite direction. Going back to your earlier post perhaps it is the wrong approach to focus solely on the climate issue when socialism is what's required. There bound up. Even under capitalism a government could choose to end austerity by putting a shit ton into building a renewables based infrastructure, better public transport etcthat would as well as probably improve the climate sitiation help with unemployment , improve growth and all that bollocks. Whether they'd be able to get it done is another question but a strong anti-austerity movement (and hopefully a lot more ambitious than that) possibly with environmental concerns (most people have them but have more immediate needs) would help them push it through against the objections of the vested interests. There's more that can be done than either putting everything into the climate movement or waiting for full communism to save us.
No. But they are irrelevant if you think the world is about to end.
They weren't relevant to the point I was making.
Your argument is a bit of a mess, tbh. Ask the class what they want/need, but in such a way as to get the answer you want. Exactly the same as the 'trots' you are meant to be different to. YOU are saying you have the answer - which is to work locally on whatever the issue of the day is. Just like the SWP try and do on a national scale.
1 - No I dont, but if I did, it'd be of clear vital importance to argue for it. There is actually nothing wrong with arguing for action around what you believe to be the most important issue of the day. Indeed, it is perfectly logical and sensible.
2. your error here is, i believe, shown in the following paragraph - 'that is all that is possible' That's not something I believe, altho if you start from that point, you will never, go beyond it.
Do you believe it? If so what do you suggest can practically be done, which will engage people where they are? If not; why not?
As for how you ask the question, of course you're right. Given the current weakness of pro-working class politics, I'd be inclined to ask questions with a smaller/local/specific focus rather than ones couched in large/global/general terms.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
i take it you've wilfully ignored the thread about people who have killed themselves because of austerity. i suppose you aren't too fussed about people needing to use food banks, nor about people losing their jobs because of the government's austerity policies. for a lot of people austerity and combating it is a more immediate struggle than worrying about the effects of climate change, which are probably a bit further off than next month, next week or indeed tomorrow. i thought you were one of those clapton fans who so likes to through their weight about. perhaps you could engage brain before farting about what the most important issues are, because the most PRESSING issues are austerity and the divides in the working class it fosters and exacerbates: and then, being as it isn't going to kill us all next week, climate change. in your job - i assume you've got one - do you never have to prioritise your work?
Another approach could be to find out what working class people, where they live and where they work, think needs fixing. Then try to work with them to develop fixes which defend and promote principles such as freedom, solidarity, equality and sustainability.
Gentrification of allotments.Permit me a moment's dry amusement at coming back from pushing a wheelbarrow around all day to find myself lectured on my disconnect from the working class by an academic and a librarian. "One of those Clapton fans"? Been sniffing the tippex again?
so you don't have to prioritise your work then.Permit me a moment's dry amusement at coming back from pushing a wheelbarrow around all day to find myself lectured on my disconnect from the working class by an academic and a librarian. "One of those Clapton fans"? Been sniffing the tippex again?
so you don't have to prioritise your work then.
Permit me a moment's dry amusement at coming back from pushing a wheelbarrow around all day to find myself lectured on my disconnect from the working class by an academic and a librarian. "One of those Clapton fans"? Been sniffing the tippex again?
Permit me a moment's dry amusement at coming back from pushing a wheelbarrow around all day to find myself lectured on my disconnect from the working class by an academic and a librarian. "One of those Clapton fans"? Been sniffing the tippex again?
perhaps if you read my post which caused you such amusement you might see. and - as louis says above - i'd be interested if you could point to where i lectured you on this disconnect from the working class.In the sense that I have to go and do it - yes I do. What's your point?
no, you're quite capable of making an arse of yourself without needing to go to those lengths.Oh lads, you so desperatley want me to be an equal opportunities officer in a radical dance troupe or something don't you?