Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

EDL watch

i'd suggest 'the right to riot: aspects of the london high church riots, 1710-1723' by james leonard fitts (phd thesis, ucla 1971), which i read many years ago. more accessible and easier to find material may appear in violent london, but it's a while since i looked at that and it's not really all that good on a lot of things.

cheers, will check them out
 
communities or community leaders?

yeah well put! the EDL bus in loads of people and the 'opposition' - like we had in cambridge last week - are local. the EDL attack local antifascist meetings, stalls etc. the EDL face opposition because local folk do not like a bunch of pissed up hooligans coming from far and wide claiming to represent them, marching through their towns and causing mass irritation (like last week in halifax!). check any images from the EDL demos. their divisional hoodies identify this, so thanks for that. i'm sure plod feels the same! few on the EDL demos are actually from the town - rochdale, brighton etc all had people bussed in from miles away as local EDL support was so weak.
 
cheers, will check them out
had another look at violent london just now and although mentioned in passing, it's written by a literature scholar who has managed to leave a lot of things out. it's ok as an overview, but it's by no means the work he should have written.

charles tilly's 'popular contention in great britain, 1758-1834' is better in many ways for the latter half of the eighteenth century. hibbert's 'king mob' is *the* book on the gordon riots, although linebaugh's 'london hanged' is also decent. parts of shoemaker's 'the london mob' are also not without interest.
 
'Church and king
Another loyalist response to radical extremism was the Church and King mobs. These began in Birmingham in July 1791, when reformers celebrating the fall of the Bastille were attacked in their meeting houses. With the connivance of local magistrates, the chemist Dr Joseph Priestley was targeted by a crowd; when the riot got out of hand, it had to be put down by cavalry.'

I think the notion of the EDL being similar to Loyalist groups and the CAK mobs particularly is a good analysis, much better than 'the fash' You could also include the gangs that attacked pacifists, etc in WW1. Their future trajectory would suggest they will increasingly attack leftists, T.Unionists, liberal church people, etc as 'traitors'
 
You call us fascists but how can we be when we have no desire for power or control, we simply want our voices to be heard and you must admit that we are now a household name and we are forcing politicians to listen and the debate on Islamofascism is much more out in the open now and into mainline politics. We have forced the establishment to take notice.
We will continue to kick our way into the headlines until they do something about our concerns.

So what you're saying is that through intimidation, violence and fearmongering you've helped dictate the political agenda? How very un-fascist of you.
 
malatesta32 - see also the "EDL LGBT Division", whose modus operandi seems to be "if you're white, gay's alright, if you're brown (etc), gays should go down" - see their "All Muslims are paedophiles who like to (homophobic term for anal sex) little boys" spiel - sounding mightily familiar to the "all gays are paedophiles" spiel I've heard from certain quarters over the years.
This specific "division" even claimed that the lyrics for Siouxsie and the Banshees' "Arabian Knights" were anti-Muslim, and therefore "patriotic"!

I wonder what they make of The Cure's "Killing An Arab"!
 
yeah well put! the EDL bus in loads of people and the 'opposition' - like we had in cambridge last week - are local. the EDL attack local antifascist meetings, stalls etc. the EDL face opposition because local folk do not like a bunch of pissed up hooligans coming from far and wide claiming to represent them, marching through their towns and causing mass irritation (like last week in halifax!). check any images from the EDL demos. their divisional hoodies identify this, so thanks for that. i'm sure plod feels the same! few on the EDL demos are actually from the town - rochdale, brighton etc all had people bussed in from miles away as local EDL support was so weak.

at their demo in Reading they had barely 300, despite bringing people from plymouth through to kent and essex. Even their stall two weeks before had mostly surrey division on it.
 
I haven't read the thread all the way though so don't shout at me if it's already been said but...

I keep hearing rumours the EDL are tagging on to other groups. I heard something about them trying to march with a gay pride thing.
Unsure of the truth but it sounds like their tactics. May be worth a look to keep the nasty bastards in check.
 
I haven't read the thread all the way though so don't shout at me if it's already been said but...

I keep hearing rumours the EDL are tagging on to other groups. I heard something about them trying to march with a gay pride thing.
Unsure of the truth but it sounds like their tactics. May be worth a look to keep the nasty bastards in check.

There was to be a Gay Pride march in East London, but said march was canned when it was discovered that one of the people organising it was from the EDL LGBT "division", which pissed many people involved off. Said march was to take place in Tower Hamlets too...

e2a: The march was going to take place in Whitechapel in TH to be specific.
 
"An English Defence League supporter who clashed with Asian men after a protest march cannot carry out his community work as part of a multi-ethnic group, a court heard."

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/EDL-man-will-do-community-order-alone-15072011.htm

Magistrates requested a report on whether Hopkins would be suitable for community work and the court probation officer said that although he was suitable, the nature of the offence meant he could not take part in the multi-cultural work teams and would have to go on an individual placement.

I don't understand the reasoning there.
 
didn't that get the nf down to a cure gig?

Spot on, there. If I recall correctly, an NF-er was present at a Cure gig at the Nashville Rooms, and went to speak to drummer Lol Tolhurst after the gig. NF bloke enthused how "Killing An Arab" was a great song, and asked whether the Cure be interested in what the NF were up to. "Pleasantries" were then exchanged between Tolhurst and NF bloke, leading to a swift exit by Mr NF, and Tolhurst quickly let the others know what the hell happened.
 
he's a racist, therefore he can't work with people from another ethnicity, therefore he has to go on individual placement. might be something his lawyers argued for so he could have a dossier time.

Is the point re providing a service in which other offenders aren't subject to discriminatory behaviour or for his own comfort? I would have him in the 'multi cultural' group as after all he lives in a 'multi cultural' society
 
Isn't it just as likely that the authorities are worried he may get beaten up by the other 'prisoners' for what he did

In which case he should be put in a "multicultural" group. Might teach him that there are consequences to acting like a complete cunt.
 
I've seen an EDL moron on youtube going on about that one. It's one of my all time favourite clips.
He's so thick I'm amazed he remembers to breath.

Did you realise he was actually saying rape gangs not rayguns? I guess him being drunk and northern seems to have fooled most people.
 
after all the usual blether this week the EDL had another case of being spread too thinly at the weekend. they had about 150 in pompey trudging round in rain with soggy trainers and a dampened espirit de corps. they claimed they tried to tear into UAF but were prevented by plod. cripes! in manchester, plod had them well checked. a bunch were hassled before theyd even left bolton. manchester 'dibble' were all over them and they were dispersed from the centre. they had advertised on facebook all week of course so they ended up skulking in a few boozers before nicking off home for a cup of tea and a bun. ah!
http://ukfd.org/topic/8885370/1/
a few had a ding dong in trafalgar square but not sure what that was about. any info? as usual they will talk this up as a massive victory but it was literally a damp squib. they need the media attention for their ego boosts but it seems unless they pull off something big (instead of pulling themselves off over tommy) they dont get it. poor dears!
 
Did you realise he was actually saying rape gangs not rayguns? I guess him being drunk and northern seems to have fooled most people.

BA, he was not only drunk but incoherent and clueless as to why he was there - halal pork, iraqi law? - cripes! most people on most demos have an understanding of the issues they are demonstrating about but daft lad did not. what it did was show the EDL is more like a terrace fashion whose demos will suffer once footie season starts.
 
Poor sod, just because he is inarticulate, does that mean he shouldn't have a voice. Also it should be noted that this comes from Press TV, an Iranian government station, how many murders etc have they covered up, it's, in my view, as bad as any of Hitlers propaganda machine.
I'm surprised you even give it the time of day, all those students who got rid of the Shah, now all dead, hanged, beaten and tortured.
The crime of this guy is that he is a drunken, inarticulate working class bloke, so I don't think Press TV have any moral ground to stand on here.

Arthur.
 
Poor sod, just because he is inarticulate, does that mean he shouldn't have a voice. Also it should be noted that this comes from Press TV, an Iranian government station, how many murders etc have they covered up, it's, in my view, as bad as any of Hitlers propaganda machine.
I'm surprised you even give it the time of day, all those students who got rid of the Shah, now all dead, hanged, beaten and tortured.
The crime of this guy is that he is a drunken, inarticulate working class bloke, so I don't think Press TV have any moral ground to stand on here.

Arthur.

No his crime is being a racist drunken, inarticulate working class bloke.
 
Poor sod, just because he is inarticulate, does that mean he shouldn't have a voice. Also it should be noted that this comes from Press TV, an Iranian government station, how many murders etc have they covered up, it's, in my view, as bad as any of Hitlers propaganda machine.
I'm surprised you even give it the time of day, all those students who got rid of the Shah, now all dead, hanged, beaten and tortured.
The crime of this guy is that he is a drunken, inarticulate working class bloke, so I don't think Press TV have any moral ground to stand on here.

Arthur.



Those of us who are working class know, however, that it's perfectly possible to be working class (and drunken) and still be an ignorant prick.

It was a mostly working class uprising that, for good or ill, got rid of the Shah of Iran.
 
The crime of this guy is that he is a drunken, inarticulate working class bloke, so I don't think Press TV have any moral ground to stand on here.Arthur.[/QUOTE]

arthur, no one has said he has committed any crime. it was pointed out that he had no idea why he was there. halal pork? iraqi law? and just because people do not like you does not mean we like the people you oppose. this is extremely naive politics on your behalf. your thought process is thus: i hate muslimic extremists; antifascists hate me; therefore antifascists must like muslamic extremists. this is a poor syllogism indeed, false logic and naive politics in the extreme.
 
The crime of this guy is that he is a drunken, inarticulate working class bloke, so I don't think Press TV have any moral ground to stand on here.Arthur.

arthur, no one has said he has committed any crime. it was pointed out that he had no idea why he was there. halal pork? iraqi law? and just because people do not like you does not mean we like the people you oppose. this is extremely naive politics on your behalf. your thought process is thus: i hate muslimic extremists; antifascists hate me; therefore antifascists must like muslamic extremists. this is a poor syllogism indeed, false logic and naive politics in the extreme.[/QUOTE]
 
Back
Top Bottom