Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
I think it's to ruin all the hard work they've done so they have to re-do it, thereby stalling the time before they get to work on digging up Owen. Buying time basically.
eastenders - bizarre and shit
- Thread starter butchersapron
- Start date
I think it's to ruin all the hard work they've done so they have to re-do it, thereby stalling the time before they get to work on digging up Owen. Buying time basically.
Hellsbells
World's best procrastinator
Sugar?!? 
this is the same for me which is why i like this thread.
okay so religious dude killed someone - who did he kill?
and no - don't watch it enough to find anything 'obvious'. sorry
If it was social services she passed the kid over to.
Roxxie's chihuahua might be eating the nipper by this time next week...
yeah - i am not sure it was. they seemed to hide the character a bit.
and who is owen?
Griff
Feeding the foxes
He killed Owen by strangling him with a tie.
Owen was the ex-alchie ex-husband of Denise who religous dude, Lucas is now married to.
He then rolled him up in a carpet and buried him under the small tree in the Square.
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
bah sports relief has knocked tonights episode off the schedule. Fucking charity
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Really?He killed Owen by strangling him with a tie.
Owen was the ex-alchie ex-husband of Denise who religous dude, Lucas is now married to.
He then rolled him up in a carpet and buried him under the small tree in the Square.
That really is bizarre and shit then. How the fuck is he supposed to have done that with no-one seing/hearing him?
Griff
Feeding the foxes
On his wedding day too.
Yeah, slipped out for a bit, buried the ex in the middle of the square, then went home and sorted Denise out.
what the fuck? really? that's ridiculous.He killed Owen by strangling him with a tie.
Owen was the ex-alchie ex-husband of Denise who religous dude, Lucas is now married to.
He then rolled him up in a carpet and buried him under the small tree in the Square.
he had a weird junkie ex too didn't he. damn it - i thought he was all good and holy.
just caught up on wikipedia.
1927
Funnier than he thinks he is.
Of course the ridiculous thing is he didnt murder his ex, it was an accident, but in true tv style instead of coming clean he tries to hide it all therefore by inference making himself into a murderer, iyswim!
Griff
Feeding the foxes
Griff
Feeding the foxes
Griff
Feeding the foxes
Well he didn't actually murder his ex, she fell on a rake that went through her neck.
But he didn't actually do much to help, and just left her stinking up the shed on the allotment for weeks.No, Denise and Libby haven't got a clue about his murdering ways or the fact that Owen is acting as compost in the square.
Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
In terms of the criminal law, he may actually have been guilty of murder anyway though. Although he didn't intend to kill her when he pushed her he subsequently formed such an intention by refraining from seeking help. At the very least he would have been guilty of manslaughter.
Makes me shudder think about the rake in the neck thing...
Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
But he did murder Owen good and proper though.
It's one of things I respect most about him actually. I wished he'd do a bit more murdering, it would keep on the straight and narrow and away from all that god bothering shit.
1927
Funnier than he thinks he is.
But he did murder Owen good and proper though.
But wasn't that because Owen had woked out the truth abiout the garden shed? So the shed thing set off a whole chain of events!
dylans
overlord of all acorns
He has that sorted. He is convinced he's doing gods work.
zenie
>^^<
We are all sinners, we only need ask Gods forgiveness in order to get entry to the kingdom of heaven.
D)
story
Changing the facts
'kay, so I'm watching the omnibus and I don't watch often enough to really know who's who.
But this thread has taught me that someone has buried someone in the flower bed in the middle of the square.
And he's now fretting desperately because the womenfolk of Walford are (for some reason) all out digging and planting and hoeing.
I have a question:
Why the blithering fuck would anyone bury a body in the middle of a city square? It'd be like burying the boss in Golden Square.
But this thread has taught me that someone has buried someone in the flower bed in the middle of the square.
And he's now fretting desperately because the womenfolk of Walford are (for some reason) all out digging and planting and hoeing.
I have a question:
Why the blithering fuck would anyone bury a body in the middle of a city square? It'd be like burying the boss in Golden Square.
Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
much like choosing the local boozer to air ones dirty linen, the incompetency of both murderers and police is a baffling but plot convenient staple of ye soaps
_angel_
.
The Walford police that decide a murder investigation on the basis of one anonymous call?
And don't bother interviewing the suspects wife?DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
See also: charging Gail for a shaky murder charge when she has admitted to perverting the cause.
story
Changing the facts
In ye olden days, when we used to watch Earbenders quite a lot, we were always hollering "TELL HER!!!" "TELL THEM!!!" "FOR GOD"S SAKE JUST TELL HER!!!!" at the telly. Like that.
Aside from all the other nonsensical absurdity that drives a soap, Earbenders seems to rely for narrative drive almost exclusively on the pathological inability of every character to share vital information with interested parties.
It got annoying. Is it the same?
Oh, and the other annoying thing about 'stenders is their truly crap villainry. Never in all my varied and colourful days have I encountered such crap villains.
Truly 'tis bizarre an shit.
Aside from all the other nonsensical absurdity that drives a soap, Earbenders seems to rely for narrative drive almost exclusively on the pathological inability of every character to share vital information with interested parties.
It got annoying. Is it the same?
Oh, and the other annoying thing about 'stenders is their truly crap villainry. Never in all my varied and colourful days have I encountered such crap villains.
Truly 'tis bizarre an shit.
Similar threads
