Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

eastenders - bizarre and shit

How absurd that Lucas was on camera buying the flowers. If I was gonna cover up a murder I wouldn't be going round and ordering the flowers myself.

If I was going to cover up a murder I wouldn't bury the body in a public square. I don't think Lucas is a master criminal tbf.
 
Really can't be bothered watching the repeat on now, was it any good tonight? Anything exciting happen? Did they dig up Owen?
 
This whole Lucy pregnancy thing - sets up Eastenders storylines for 20 odd years if she has it her parents bring it up as their own. Kat Slater mk 2.
 
I think she is out of order not telling the dad what she is planning, but he don't help himself with the 'I'll go clinic with you' stuff.

And Zaynab was proper out of order tonight.
 
This live episode when they had multiple endings and the actors didn't know who killed Archie.

How does that work then? If Eastenders episodes are filmed about six weeks before they're aired, what about the shows we're seeing now, where they discuss Archies killer?

The episodes subsequent to the "live" one must've been shot 6 weeks ago i.e. before the "live" one. The actors would've have known from the subsequent scripts who killed Archie!

No :confused:?
 
This live episode when they had multiple endings and the actors didn't know who killed Archie.

How does that work then? If Eastenders episodes are filmed about six weeks before they're aired, what about the shows we're seeing now, where they discuss Archies killer?

The episodes subsequent to the "live" one must've been shot 6 weeks ago i.e. before the "live" one. The actors would've have known from the subsequent plot lines who killed Archie!

No :confused:?

Now that's a good point. There is also a lot of snow, unless that's fake snow and it was only filmed after the live show making us think it was filmed six weeks ago.

:confused::hmm:
 
This live episode when they had multiple endings and the actors didn't know who killed Archie.

How does that work then? If Eastenders episodes are filmed about six weeks before they're aired, what about the shows we're seeing now, where they discuss Archies killer?

The episodes subsequent to the "live" one must've been shot 6 weeks ago i.e. before the "live" one. The actors would've have known from the subsequent scripts who killed Archie!

No :confused:?

that's what I said!

altho' Janine and whatshisname haven't been in it since -- I think it's poss they could have thought it was them too, but really, judging by the script it must have been fairly clear to the actors who it was (Stacey)
 
what was that religious guy up to tonight? i didn't watch it properly but he seemed to be going a bit loopy towards the end - why?
phil's kid story line was cool though.
 
Has he buried someone or something under the primroses?



I liked this thread better when it was called eastenders - bizarre an shit.

The extra D is redun'ant :mad:
 
This live episode when they had multiple endings and the actors didn't know who killed Archie.

How does that work then? If Eastenders episodes are filmed about six weeks before they're aired, what about the shows we're seeing now, where they discuss Archies killer?

The episodes subsequent to the "live" one must've been shot 6 weeks ago i.e. before the "live" one. The actors would've have known from the subsequent scripts who killed Archie!

No ?

The episodes were designed to deal with the ambiguity... think abaht it ;)

Now that's a good point. There is also a lot of snow, unless that's fake snow and it was only filmed after the live show making us think it was filmed six weeks ago.

It's the real snow from January - at some point they just gave up waiting for it to bog off, else they'd have had a massive backlog of outdoor scenes to film.

Has he buried someone or something under the primroses?



I liked this thread better when it was called eastenders - bizarre an shit.

The extra D is redun'ant :mad:

I liked "bizarre an shit" too :D

it's hard to imagine story watching enders though :hmm:
 
This live episode when they had multiple endings and the actors didn't know who killed Archie.

How does that work then? If Eastenders episodes are filmed about six weeks before they're aired, what about the shows we're seeing now, where they discuss Archies killer?

The episodes subsequent to the "live" one must've been shot 6 weeks ago i.e. before the "live" one. The actors would've have known from the subsequent scripts who killed Archie!

No :confused:?

Because about two people know who killed archie. That's all.
 
were we really supposed to be suprised by the revelation that that little kid was Louise? It seemed pretty blatently obvious to me :rolleyes:
 
were we really supposed to be suprised by the revelation that that little kid was Louise? It seemed pretty blatently obvious to me :rolleyes:

Yeah, that's what I thought. And surely social services will contact Phil anyway, not leave it for Ronnie to decide what to do!
 
What's Lucas up to with all that vandalism? :hmm:

Only caught the end last night.

He burried that stupid woman he murdered under that tree, didn't he. And now everyone wants to dig it up. Not entirely sure why. Storyline is stupid and boring and i can't be bothered to pay proper attention :D
 
It's funny because the look of desperation on his face makes me laugh. I thought it was just her bracelet buried there and not the whole body.
 
I liked "bizarre an shit" too :D

it's hard to imagine story watching enders though :hmm:


I defy your expectations! Ha!




(actually I rarely watch it. Tuned in to see the live episode and kinda drifted into it, but no real idea who's who or what's what. Ummi Kumar is on it now... isn't she...)
 
It's Owen under the tree, not Trina! I'm not sure what the vandalism will achieve, other than to make the others think it isn't worth it.
 
Yeah, that's what I thought. And surely social services will contact Phil anyway, not leave it for Ronnie to decide what to do!

Why did Ronnie go so weird ey? Surely no matter what Lisa may have told Louise about Phil, you'd take a kid to their Dad if they just turn up saying their Mum's gone on holiday and left 'em don't you? :confused: (I missed it but that's what she said she was doing there didn't she?)

Has Ronnie gone a bit bonkers? :D
 
Yeah, that's what I thought. And surely social services will contact Phil anyway, not leave it for Ronnie to decide what to do!

If it was social services she passed the kid over to.:hmm:

Roxxie's chihuahua might be eating the nipper by this time next week...
 
Back
Top Bottom