It's Mishi, you could message him on fb. Incidentally, via Mishi's wall, I've only realised right now is the first time we've been top of the Isthmian League since 1978!I think that article should be shared more widely. have you a contact email so I can ask if it's OK to republish on Brixton Buzz?
My second-hand understanding of matters is that Maidstone will be discounted when the automatic promotion and play-off places are awarded because of the 3G pitch issue, so whilst they'd lead the Isthmian League if they won they wouldn't lead the race for the promotion spot. A bit scabby I admit. I briefly considered going to that game but then remembered I'm banned from the ground.Kingstonian v Maidstone today means we'll lose top spot I think
I think that article should be shared more widely. have you a contact email so I can ask if it's OK to republish on Brixton Buzz?
If Maidstone finished top, couldn't they agree to play somewhere else (on grass) until they changed their pitch back to grass (if that's what they wanted to do)? I seem to remember there is a cut off point (of 1 June or 1 July) or something to have your ground ready for the following season. Might be wrong though.My second-hand understanding of matters is that Maidstone will be discounted when the automatic promotion and play-off places are awarded because of the 3G pitch issue, so whilst they'd lead the Isthmian League if they won they wouldn't lead the race for the promotion spot.
If Maidstone finished top, couldn't they agree to play somewhere else (on grass) until they changed their pitch back to grass (if that's what they wanted to do)? I seem to remember there is a cut off point (of 1 June or 1 July) or something to have your ground ready for the following season. Might be wrong though.
That's great. What name do you want to me to credit the piece to?It's a comment on a public unofficial messageboard. it's therefore in the public domain...you don't need my permission! (The only thing I'm 'precious about', if shared, wanting people to have the decency to have the manners to ask permission are photos & poetry! ;-)
Just note that I speak in my individual 'lifelong Hamlet fna' hat NOT as a Club official!
It strikes me that the supporters trust need to do two things
1) Take over or get a controlling interest in the club.
2) Find somewhere else for us to play, whether that is Greendales or not.
If Maidstone finished top, couldn't they agree to play somewhere else (on grass) until they changed their pitch back to grass (if that's what they wanted to do)? I seem to remember there is a cut off point (of 1 June or 1 July) or something to have your ground ready for the following season. Might be wrong though.
That's great. What name do you want to me to credit the piece to?
Anyone else?Scutta says he'll be in fox on hill from 3pm today
Anyone else?
Just woken up and about to ring you (I actually have to walk outside of my flat to get reception, it's like the fucking Yorkshire Moors!)Anyone else?
Hang on a sec, the blurb for the trust says "An independent, democratic, not for profit organisation aiming to secure a successful and sustainable future for Dulwich Hamlet Football Club by increasing supporter involvement in its running." How are they going to do that without a share in the limited company?.There are a few 'slight' things wrong with this statement.
Firstly, the Trust do NOT want to take over the Club, or have a controlling interest, even if they had the money to so. At it stands the owner of Dulwich Hamlet Football Club Limited owns over 99 per cent of the total shareholdings, at a guess. May 'only' be 98% or even 97%, but you get my drift. I understand he recently offered the Trust the opportunity to buy shares at £1 each, which is their original issue value. Quite rightly, they did not take him up on this. However, I also understand they did not even get back to him to offer something else, as a starting figure for negotiations, which I believe they should have done, offering him a tocken penny a share. Even they they have about £25, 000 in their 'war chest', which really wouldn't go far.
So what should the supporters trust do them?. Just monitor the situation and not get involved in the club or the ground?Secondly, Find somewhere else to play, whether Greendales or not. First of all how can they find us Greendales to play on? If this were an option, which I hope it is, hand in hand with property being built on on the current Chanpion Hill, then we will have a new ground built for us, no need for Trust intervention. If you mean somewhere else to play, as in a groundshare, the Club would-in effect have to go amateur, and not pay the players, as every penny raised would go on ground hire, of another local(ish) club, where we could groundshare that has a grading, with any money raised through much reduced crowds as a result of not playing at our own ground in Dulwich, going simply to keep the Club in existence.
It's all very easy to call for Supporters to take over, but it's very difficult to actually happen.
Hang on a sec, the blurb for the trust says "An independent, democratic, not for profit organisation aiming to secure a successful and sustainable future for Dulwich Hamlet Football Club by increasing supporter involvement in its running." How are they going to do that without a share in the limited company?.
So what should the supporters trust do them?. Just monitor the situation and not get involved in the club or the ground?
I'd think the first thing they should do is push for more transparency. It's impossible to say what they should ultimately aim for when the situation is so opaque. Maybe entering into negotiations with the owner would at least get a look at the books (maybe not, I don't know).
I thought that when the previous redevelopment proposal in conjunction with Sainsbury's Homebase came up in 1999. (Ultimately rejected by Southwark Council two and a half years later, even though their own Planning Officer recommended they approve it.) At that time we still had more than a decade on our lease so Homebase had to accommodate us elsewhere to get their hands on the site. King's College London owned the present ground at the time and I think part of the deal was that Southwark Council would sell Greendales to the developers and we would get the freehold of the new ground there.Moving to an unused site 200 yards away sounds perfectly acceptable, if totally pointless.
The distance isn't a problem, but it's not a nice walk. (I've done it for two previous visits, both on Saturdays during British Summer Time, and it takes about half an hour.) Can't remember whether all the roads are lit or not. I can't make it on Tuesday, but personally I'd make use of the bus, although the service becomes less frequant after the game, meaning you'd be hanging around for the best part of an hour:I'm looking at a train to Stanford le Hope from Fenchurch St (50m) and then a jaunty walk.
View attachment 47537
For the avoidance of doubt, this is Greendale
Sainsbury's in the middle at the top, Champion Hill field of dreams just below, training pitches and Greendale to the left.
Yep, I thought the same thing myself!Thanks Hatter I thought someone mentioned penge, didnt expect it to be next door. Why dont they just build their flats on Greendales and leave the pitch where it is <it would be the same outcome really. <Rhetorical question