Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Driving Standards

This is going to play out well. If they don't prosecute and fine him then every other person caught not wearing a seat belt will be using this as their defence arguement.
 
It's seized for no insurance because it's impossible for the scrote to drive away from the scene legally. They can, and often will, seize the car for 'driving like a cunt', but it creates a shit load of work (car has to be collected and impounded; the driver transferred to safety if it's on a motorway; police officers taken away from other stuff, etc ... ), so it probably more efficient to let the driver take his own car away and do him later through the courts if he's not pissed/uninsured/no licence ....

He didn’t have insurance because no one would sell it to him. The dealer who sold him the car 2 days earlier would’ve known that, so they should be investigated too if they let him it drive away without checking.


Can’t be taxed without insurance, so can be crushed or forfeited and sold if worth a few bob…
 
This is going to play out well. If they don't prosecute and fine him then every other person caught not wearing a seat belt will be using this as their defence arguement.


He was making a YouTube video, like the guy in the stolen RS6 who was doing >200mph on the M23, so if Sunak gets off, RS6 man has grounds for appeal…
 
This happened a few months ago in Spain, but I have only just heard. Some twat decided to have a race with a 300 kph high speed train...

 
Not necessarily.

PV.png

There aren't always that many peds on it and you can drive down the approach roads, so if you miss a small sign, you'll end up on the bridge.
 
Last edited:
Much to my shame I remember trying to drive a support van for a cycling event onto the old pedestrian ferry at the back of Amsterdam Central train station. My only defence was this was pre-Sat Nav and I'd only been given the sketchiest of directions and a map. Much arm waving by the locals avoided a major catastrophe.
 

Drunk, or drugged, or both (refused any tests). Crashed, fucked off and crashed again killing a 19 year old woman. When caught he said:

"I hope I killed someone. Oh well, you know what, I will get three, four, five years. Hopefully I killed them."

The the fucking charmer followed that up with:

"I'm glad she is dead, she deserved it."

Hawkes' sentence is among the first to take place under new sentencing guidelines, which allows judges to give tougher sentences for dangerous and careless driving deaths, increasing the maximum term from 14 years to life imprisonment for dangerous driving.

So does he get >14? Does he get life? Does he fuck: 10 years +12 year driving ban.

wtf is wrong with this country?
 

Drunk, or drugged, or both (refused any tests). Crashed, fucked off and crashed again killing a 19 year old woman. When caught he said:

"I hope I killed someone. Oh well, you know what, I will get three, four, five years. Hopefully I killed them."

The the fucking charmer followed that up with:

"I'm glad she is dead, she deserved it."



So does he get >14? Does he get life? Does he fuck: 10 years +12 year driving ban.

wtf is wrong with this country?
Out after 5 years with good behaviour
 
As has been observed so many times before, if you want to kill someone and get off lightly (if not away with it altogether) use a car

Laws are optional when you drive a car, if anyone challenges that they are a wrong un

 
My elder daughter was pulled over by the police yesterday. During a driving lesson!

There was nothing wrong with her driving but she was on a motorway and they wanted to check she was with a real instructor
 
As has been observed so many times before, if you want to kill someone and get off lightly (if not away with it altogether) use a car
Yes.
This happened in my old street. It was clearly a murder, but because he used a car to do it, that wasn’t the conviction he ended up with.
 
Yes.
This happened in my old street. It was clearly a murder, but because he used a car to do it, that wasn’t the conviction he ended up with.

Not really. He was tried for murder but the jury cleared him of that and found him guilty of manslaughter instead. Nothing to do with the car.
 
Yes it is though. If he’d used a different weapon, it would have clearly been a murder conviction, because it was, nobody attempted to dispute, intentional, not any kind of accident. But, is a touchy subject for me that case.
 
Yes it is though. If he’d used a different weapon, it would have clearly been a murder conviction, because it was, nobody attempted to dispute, intentional, not any kind of accident. But, is a touchy subject for me that case.

Well if he'd used a different weapon the intent to kill my have been clearer but his defence was likely that he didn't mean to kill the lad and the jury weren't convinced that he did.
 
My elder daughter was pulled over by the police yesterday. During a driving lesson!

There was nothing wrong with her driving but she was on a motorway and they wanted to check she was with a real instructor
Out of curiosity, am I right to guess you don’t need to have a dual-control car to give someone driving lessons in this country, then?

In Spain only qualified instructors with such cars are allowed to perform learning lessons on the road. The UK is usually far more hardcore than Spain regarding motoring laws, but this is the one area where the UK seems surprisingly lax.
 
Out of curiosity, am I right to guess you don’t need to have a dual-control car to give someone driving lessons in this country, then?

In Spain only qualified instructors with such cars are allowed to perform learning lessons on the road. The UK is usually far more hardcore than Spain regarding motoring laws, but this is the one area where the UK seems surprisingly lax.
That's correct. No dual controls needed, apart from on motorways.

She has lessons from the instructor and then I take her out for practice
 
A qualified driver over 21 (?) Can teach people to drive in their own car, be it a fiat 500 or maybe even a Ferrari and they would not have or need dual controls.
 
That's correct. No dual controls needed, apart from on motorways.

She has lessons from the instructor and then I take her out for practice
In my foreign mind, that’s fucking madness tbh. Not saying your daughter and countless other learners are reckless fools of course, but still, for a country that has some absurdly strict OTT rules (such as an experienced driver eating an apple whilst stationary at a traffic lights being deemed unacceptably risky and illegal), to tolerate at the same time an unqualified learner to actually operate a car on the public roads and even motorways if a qualified driver supervising them is the single most fucking inconsistently idiotic thing I’ve ever seen.
 
In my foreign mind, that’s fucking madness tbh. Not saying your daughter and countless other learners are reckless fools of course, but still, for a country that has some absurdly strict OTT rules (such as an experienced driver eating an apple whilst stationary at a traffic lights being deemed unacceptably risky and illegal), to tolerate at the same time an unqualified learner to actually operate a car on the public roads and even motorways if a qualified driver supervising them is the single most fucking inconsistently idiotic thing I’ve ever seen.

Most of us will have been taught by our parents to an extent. Possibly why there's so many shit drivers on the roads

And learners can only go on motorways with proper instructors
 
Back
Top Bottom