Be reasonable, he did apologiseThis is going to play out well. If they don't prosecute and fine him then every other person caught not wearing a seat belt will be using this as their defence arguement.
It's seized for no insurance because it's impossible for the scrote to drive away from the scene legally. They can, and often will, seize the car for 'driving like a cunt', but it creates a shit load of work (car has to be collected and impounded; the driver transferred to safety if it's on a motorway; police officers taken away from other stuff, etc ... ), so it probably more efficient to let the driver take his own car away and do him later through the courts if he's not pissed/uninsured/no licence ....
He didn’t have insurance because no one would sell it to him. The dealer who sold him the car 2 days earlier would’ve known that, so they should be investigated too if they let him it drive away without checking.
This is going to play out well. If they don't prosecute and fine him then every other person caught not wearing a seat belt will be using this as their defence arguement.
Oh dear, what a pity, he's been fined
Just how stupid or arrogant do you need to be? https://www.thelocal.it/20230127/us...or-driving-on-florences-ponte-vecchio-bridge/
Hawkes' sentence is among the first to take place under new sentencing guidelines, which allows judges to give tougher sentences for dangerous and careless driving deaths, increasing the maximum term from 14 years to life imprisonment for dangerous driving.
Out after 5 years with good behaviourMan jailed for killing 19-year-old woman in crash
Luke Hawkes, 28, was heard on police cameras saying he was "glad" he had killed someone.www.bbc.co.uk
Drunk, or drugged, or both (refused any tests). Crashed, fucked off and crashed again killing a 19 year old woman. When caught he said:
"I hope I killed someone. Oh well, you know what, I will get three, four, five years. Hopefully I killed them."
The the fucking charmer followed that up with:
"I'm glad she is dead, she deserved it."
So does he get >14? Does he get life? Does he fuck: 10 years +12 year driving ban.
wtf is wrong with this country?
Out after 5 years with good behaviour
As has been observed so many times before, if you want to kill someone and get off lightly (if not away with it altogether) use a car
Yes.As has been observed so many times before, if you want to kill someone and get off lightly (if not away with it altogether) use a car
Yes.
This happened in my old street. It was clearly a murder, but because he used a car to do it, that wasn’t the conviction he ended up with.
Man found guilty of manslaughter after crushing teen with car
A 30-year-old man who crushed a teenager to death with his Audi in south London has been found guilty of manslaughter.www.standard.co.uk
Yes it is though. If he’d used a different weapon, it would have clearly been a murder conviction, because it was, nobody attempted to dispute, intentional, not any kind of accident. But, is a touchy subject for me that case.
Out of curiosity, am I right to guess you don’t need to have a dual-control car to give someone driving lessons in this country, then?My elder daughter was pulled over by the police yesterday. During a driving lesson!
There was nothing wrong with her driving but she was on a motorway and they wanted to check she was with a real instructor
That's correct. No dual controls needed, apart from on motorways.Out of curiosity, am I right to guess you don’t need to have a dual-control car to give someone driving lessons in this country, then?
In Spain only qualified instructors with such cars are allowed to perform learning lessons on the road. The UK is usually far more hardcore than Spain regarding motoring laws, but this is the one area where the UK seems surprisingly lax.
In my foreign mind, that’s fucking madness tbh. Not saying your daughter and countless other learners are reckless fools of course, but still, for a country that has some absurdly strict OTT rules (such as an experienced driver eating an apple whilst stationary at a traffic lights being deemed unacceptably risky and illegal), to tolerate at the same time an unqualified learner to actually operate a car on the public roads and even motorways if a qualified driver supervising them is the single most fucking inconsistently idiotic thing I’ve ever seen.That's correct. No dual controls needed, apart from on motorways.
She has lessons from the instructor and then I take her out for practice
In my foreign mind, that’s fucking madness tbh. Not saying your daughter and countless other learners are reckless fools of course, but still, for a country that has some absurdly strict OTT rules (such as an experienced driver eating an apple whilst stationary at a traffic lights being deemed unacceptably risky and illegal), to tolerate at the same time an unqualified learner to actually operate a car on the public roads and even motorways if a qualified driver supervising them is the single most fucking inconsistently idiotic thing I’ve ever seen.
... absurdly strict OTT rules (such as an experienced driver eating an apple whilst stationary at a traffic lights being deemed unacceptably risky and illegal) ...