Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

Status
Not open for further replies.
If wikileaks didn't publicise the e-mails which showed corruption and rigging then wouldn't they have been actively helping the Clinton campaign? What would be credible about that?
Good point, but I find it strange that he was only provided info damaging to Hillary......or possibly had info damaging to Trump also and chose not to leak it. I suppose we'll never know. And again, his relationship with Fox News makes me suspicious of his motives.
 
Office of Congressional Ethics gutted by Republicans - CNNPolitics.com

This looks like its shaping up to be a good way to protect your friends and get rid of your political opponents.

To sum up:

C1OGPfEUAAEnnuz.jpg


This is probably part of why it's been abolished. The inside story behind the strange US government ethics tweets singing Donald Trump’s praises

On November 30, the official Twitter account of the Office of Government Ethics let loose with a stream of downright Trumpian tweets, congratulating the president-elect for deciding to divest himself from his business holdings to avoid conflicts of interest. There was only problem: Trump hadn’t actually decided to do that.

For folks interested, this is one of the cases that led to the founding of the OGE. Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal

The Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal was a United States political scandal first exposed in 2005 relating to the work performed by political lobbyists Jack Abramoff, Ralph E. Reed, Jr., Grover Norquist and Michael Scanlon on Native American casino gambling interests for an estimated $85 million in fees. Abramoff and Scanlon grossly overbilled their clients, secretly splitting the multimillion-dollar profits. In one case, they were secretly orchestrating lobbying against their own clients in order to force them to pay for lobbying services.

In the course of the scheme, the lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation. Representative Bob Ney (R-OH) and two aides to Tom DeLay (R-TX) have been directly implicated; other politicians have various ties.
 
To sum up:

C1OGPfEUAAEnnuz.jpg


This is probably part of why it's been abolished. The inside story behind the strange US government ethics tweets singing Donald Trump’s praises

On November 30, the official Twitter account of the Office of Government Ethics let loose with a stream of downright Trumpian tweets, congratulating the president-elect for deciding to divest himself from his business holdings to avoid conflicts of interest. There was only problem: Trump hadn’t actually decided to do that.

For folks interested, this is one of the cases that led to the founding of the OGE. Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal

The Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal was a United States political scandal first exposed in 2005 relating to the work performed by political lobbyists Jack Abramoff, Ralph E. Reed, Jr., Grover Norquist and Michael Scanlon on Native American casino gambling interests for an estimated $85 million in fees. Abramoff and Scanlon grossly overbilled their clients, secretly splitting the multimillion-dollar profits. In one case, they were secretly orchestrating lobbying against their own clients in order to force them to pay for lobbying services.

In the course of the scheme, the lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation. Representative Bob Ney (R-OH) and two aides to Tom DeLay (R-TX) have been directly implicated; other politicians have various ties.
And if you have the chrome extension, you'll see a lovely picture of two sleeping tabby kittens in this post! :) Otherwise, you see the Buzzfeed summary from Reuters.
 
I believe that "class" and reducing everything down to "class" is identity politics.
I agree. Any analysis of structural oppression and privilege that insists one facet of identity trumps all others and/or if that one form of oppression is abolished, all others will likewise disappear is politics based on identity.

It's hogwash, too.
 
I agree. Any analysis of structural oppression and privilege that insists one facet of identity trumps all others and/or if that one form of oppression is abolished, all others will likewise disappear is politics based on identity.

It's hogwash, too.

The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".

This is not, of course, to dismiss the treatment of marginalised people in the US, or indeed, anywhere else in the world by the elite/rulers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
To sum up:

C1OGPfEUAAEnnuz.jpg


This is probably part of why it's been abolished. The inside story behind the strange US government ethics tweets singing Donald Trump’s praises

On November 30, the official Twitter account of the Office of Government Ethics let loose with a stream of downright Trumpian tweets, congratulating the president-elect for deciding to divest himself from his business holdings to avoid conflicts of interest. There was only problem: Trump hadn’t actually decided to do that.

For folks interested, this is one of the cases that led to the founding of the OGE. Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal

The Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal was a United States political scandal first exposed in 2005 relating to the work performed by political lobbyists Jack Abramoff, Ralph E. Reed, Jr., Grover Norquist and Michael Scanlon on Native American casino gambling interests for an estimated $85 million in fees. Abramoff and Scanlon grossly overbilled their clients, secretly splitting the multimillion-dollar profits. In one case, they were secretly orchestrating lobbying against their own clients in order to force them to pay for lobbying services.

In the course of the scheme, the lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation. Representative Bob Ney (R-OH) and two aides to Tom DeLay (R-TX) have been directly implicated; other politicians have various ties.

Congress changed its mind.

New Republican Congress reverses ethics move after outcry - BBC News
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".

This is not, of course, to dismiss the treatment of marginalised people in the US, or indeed, anywhere else in the world by the elite/rulers.

PLEASE IDENTIFY ONE SINGLE PERSON OR GROUP (NOT NECESSARILY ON THIS THREAD) WHO BELIEVES IN THE STRAWMAN POSITION YOU AND MULTIPLE OTHER POSTERS CONTINUALLY PUSH
 
PLEASE IDENTIFY ONE SINGLE PERSON OR GROUP (NOT NECESSARILY ON THIS THREAD) WHO BELIEVES IN THE STRAWMAN POSITION YOU AND MULTIPLE OTHER POSTERS CONTINUALLY PUSH

Hey pal. I was told to read more and educate myself by my superiors here. So I looked up identity politics and bang! zoom! hit the nail on the head.

Ah, 2017... another year of digression, aggression and infighting. Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".

This is not, of course, to dismiss the treatment of marginalised people in the US, or indeed, anywhere else in the world by the elite/rulers.

Well, you get men who support feminism and white folks who fight racism, and middle and upper class people who want to end unfair class privilege.

My beef is that there isn't one "struggle" to rule them all, so to speak. Denying class struggle has anything to do with identity is just a way of trying to set class oppression above and apart from other forms of oppression.
 
My beef is that there isn't one "struggle" to rule them all, so to speak. Denying class struggle has anything to do with identity is just a way of trying to set class oppression above and apart from other forms of oppression.

These people are literally attacking us for doing the thing that they are doing, right here.
 
Well, you get men who support feminism and white folks who fight racism, and middle and upper class people who want to end unfair class privilege.

My beef is that there isn't one "struggle" to rule them all, so to speak. Denying class struggle has anything to do with identity is just a way of trying to set class oppression above and apart from other forms of oppression.
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.

ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?
 
Nice easy win for trump there. He didn't even have to do anything.

I suspect this will become a pattern.

- President and/or congress will propose to do something that's appalling to many people.
- Those people will write/phone/email legislators, demonstrate, take to social media, etc.
- Most of the time they'll be ignored or worse, vilified by the mainstream media and government.
- Now and again, they'll succeed and stop the thing, or more likely, just water it down.
- The opponents will be thrilled by the results, maybe start to believe things won't be as bad as they thought.
- President will claim credit for whatever it was that was done. His supporters will applaud his wisdom.
- Policy will quietly slip through a few months later with little protest.

House Republicans Ditch Plan to Weaken Congressional Ethics Office
 
Last edited:
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.

ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?

Feminism and racism are hardly "petty"
 
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.

ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?

Buddy, I don't know you or anyone here from Adam. You don't know me. I don't get why the hell you're so upset about what you think a total stranger has said about you and your mates on an anonymous message board. It's like some drunk guy in a pub shouting, "Who you calling a fat bastard? Did you call me a fat bastard? I'll do you, I will . . ." Either that, or the hall monitor demanding apologies for not respecting their superior status.

I don't give a monkey's arse what you or anyone else says about me here. I'd suggest you adopt the same approach, or put me on ignore.
 
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.

ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?
That is true, but oppression is also an essential and structural part of patriarchy, and of white supremacy. Or, are you arguing that misogyny and racism are "petty prejudices?" :hmm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom