J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
It sure is trumplicated. Who to be putin the blame at?
Adviser contradicts Trump: Russians hacked the US - CNNPolitics.com
I believe there were WMDs in Iraq
It sure is trumplicated. Who to be putin the blame at?
Adviser contradicts Trump: Russians hacked the US - CNNPolitics.com
I believe there were WMDs in Iraq
Good point, but I find it strange that he was only provided info damaging to Hillary......or possibly had info damaging to Trump also and chose not to leak it. I suppose we'll never know. And again, his relationship with Fox News makes me suspicious of his motives.If wikileaks didn't publicise the e-mails which showed corruption and rigging then wouldn't they have been actively helping the Clinton campaign? What would be credible about that?
Office of Congressional Ethics gutted by Republicans - CNNPolitics.com
This looks like its shaping up to be a good way to protect your friends and get rid of your political opponents.
And if you have the chrome extension, you'll see a lovely picture of two sleeping tabby kittens in this post! Otherwise, you see the Buzzfeed summary from Reuters.To sum up:
This is probably part of why it's been abolished. The inside story behind the strange US government ethics tweets singing Donald Trump’s praises
On November 30, the official Twitter account of the Office of Government Ethics let loose with a stream of downright Trumpian tweets, congratulating the president-elect for deciding to divest himself from his business holdings to avoid conflicts of interest. There was only problem: Trump hadn’t actually decided to do that.
For folks interested, this is one of the cases that led to the founding of the OGE. Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal
The Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal was a United States political scandal first exposed in 2005 relating to the work performed by political lobbyists Jack Abramoff, Ralph E. Reed, Jr., Grover Norquist and Michael Scanlon on Native American casino gambling interests for an estimated $85 million in fees. Abramoff and Scanlon grossly overbilled their clients, secretly splitting the multimillion-dollar profits. In one case, they were secretly orchestrating lobbying against their own clients in order to force them to pay for lobbying services.
In the course of the scheme, the lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation. Representative Bob Ney (R-OH) and two aides to Tom DeLay (R-TX) have been directly implicated; other politicians have various ties.
I agree. Any analysis of structural oppression and privilege that insists one facet of identity trumps all others and/or if that one form of oppression is abolished, all others will likewise disappear is politics based on identity.I believe that "class" and reducing everything down to "class" is identity politics.
You mean as in, "The British are coming?"Take back america.
I agree. Any analysis of structural oppression and privilege that insists one facet of identity trumps all others and/or if that one form of oppression is abolished, all others will likewise disappear is politics based on identity.
It's hogwash, too.
To sum up:
This is probably part of why it's been abolished. The inside story behind the strange US government ethics tweets singing Donald Trump’s praises
On November 30, the official Twitter account of the Office of Government Ethics let loose with a stream of downright Trumpian tweets, congratulating the president-elect for deciding to divest himself from his business holdings to avoid conflicts of interest. There was only problem: Trump hadn’t actually decided to do that.
For folks interested, this is one of the cases that led to the founding of the OGE. Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal
The Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal was a United States political scandal first exposed in 2005 relating to the work performed by political lobbyists Jack Abramoff, Ralph E. Reed, Jr., Grover Norquist and Michael Scanlon on Native American casino gambling interests for an estimated $85 million in fees. Abramoff and Scanlon grossly overbilled their clients, secretly splitting the multimillion-dollar profits. In one case, they were secretly orchestrating lobbying against their own clients in order to force them to pay for lobbying services.
In the course of the scheme, the lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation. Representative Bob Ney (R-OH) and two aides to Tom DeLay (R-TX) have been directly implicated; other politicians have various ties.
The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".
This is not, of course, to dismiss the treatment of marginalised people in the US, or indeed, anywhere else in the world by the elite/rulers.
why would you assume that?The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".
PLEASE IDENTIFY ONE SINGLE PERSON OR GROUP (NOT NECESSARILY ON THIS THREAD) WHO BELIEVES IN THE STRAWMAN POSITION YOU AND MULTIPLE OTHER POSTERS CONTINUALLY PUSH
Hey pal. I was told to read more and educate myself by my superiors here. So I looked up identity politics and bang! zoom! hit the nail on the head.
Ah, 2017... another year of digression, aggression and infighting. Yes.
Nice easy win for trump there. He didn't even have to do anything.
It's almost as if it was the plan all along.Same with the Ford plant.
The irony of it is; one assumes all proponents of the "class" struggle would identify as working class. Therefore, by it's very nature - it simply has to be "identity politics".
This is not, of course, to dismiss the treatment of marginalised people in the US, or indeed, anywhere else in the world by the elite/rulers.
My beef is that there isn't one "struggle" to rule them all, so to speak. Denying class struggle has anything to do with identity is just a way of trying to set class oppression above and apart from other forms of oppression.
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.Well, you get men who support feminism and white folks who fight racism, and middle and upper class people who want to end unfair class privilege.
My beef is that there isn't one "struggle" to rule them all, so to speak. Denying class struggle has anything to do with identity is just a way of trying to set class oppression above and apart from other forms of oppression.
Nice easy win for trump there. He didn't even have to do anything.
These people are literally attacking us for doing the thing that they are doing, right here.
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.
ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?
No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.
ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?
That is true, but oppression is also an essential and structural part of patriarchy, and of white supremacy. Or, are you arguing that misogyny and racism are "petty prejudices?"No it's not. It's showing that oppression is an essential and structural part of our economic and political system rather than the list of petty prejudices you seem to think it is.
ETA: any progress on names of Trump supporters or an apology for those you've smeared as such?