Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
t
oh fuck already Si the below is pretty straightforward
And what?
t
oh fuck already Si the below is pretty straightforward
Wonder why. What pleasure is to be derived from it? How does it relate to genuine concerns over populists and bigots?
Loony left, right on, politically correct, social justice warriors, woke... this is the best they have?
Utterly ridiculous.
"I would rather be woke than an ignorant twat" comes to mind Spy
The maquiladoras (sic) were set up because of NAFTA, which Trump wants to rescind. So if your heart truly burns with outrage over the maquiladoras, you ought to support Trump. But you don't. Why not? Could it be that your righteous indignation over the maquiladoras has been so to speak trumped by your passionate, MSM-induced hatred for Trump as a person?
You're not reading what he's posted correctly. You're reading what you want him to have said, not what he did.
You're woke tooThis thread is proof that it's possible to be both!
It's odd.Seems quite simple to me. He gets his jollies from acting like a prick, especially in certain threads.
Trump is racist, but the MSM is trying to smear him as racist in areas where he isn't racist, such as when he blames the US's drug problems on Mexican illegal immigrants whom he describes as 'bad hombres'. Which, according to Dwyer, is not racist.You're not reading what he's posted correctly. You're reading what you want him to have said, not what he did.
Just put them on ignore and then you only know they are posting when people keep replying.Ideally, that would be nice but if some individual came into the community pissing about all over the place, surely someone should have a word with them.
If only for their own hehealth.
I'm confused, are we talking about Spy, Phil or both?Seems quite simple to me. He gets his jollies from acting like a prick, especially in certain threads.
I put Donald Trump on ignore but it hasn't made any difference.Just put them on ignore and then you only know they are posting when people keep replying.
Tbf that was partly because he was distracted by his political opponents constantly trying to throw him out of office, put him in prison etc.Trump threatened a lot, all as a negotiating policy. He delivered virtually fuck all.
It's amazing innit. The whole "IS v. DOES" distinction just whizzed into the wild blue yonder. Might as well not have said it. And that's just one instance. It's the power of propaganda so it is, it truly does destroy the capacity for reason.
People are absolutely, irrevocably convinced that Trump passed a ban on Muslim immigration, that he said Mexicans are bad people etc. And you can't tell them differently, no matter what. They're just not going to hear it. Reason is a fragile creature.
It's total fucking bollocks that doesn't describe a single person on this thread.This is correct. That people would get upset with someone pointing it out, is actually quite strange.
'bad hombres'. Which, according to Dwyer, is not racist.
It's total fucking bollocks that doesn't describe a single person on this thread.
This is correct. That people would get upset with someone pointing it out, is actually quite strange.
The article points out his "othering" of Latinx/Hispanic/Mexican people.I suppose it might be racist, but I honestly don't see why. I've thought about it, but I just don't see it. I asked you to explain it, nothing. I believe it was two sheds posted this link as an explanation, but that just made it worse. Crazy author seems to think that Trump shouldn't be allowed to speak Spanish or something, made absolutely no sense, no help at all. Care to have another go?
Here's Why Trump's 'Bad Hombres' Comment Was So Offensive
In this case Donald, no se puede.www.huffingtonpost.co.uk
I think the public should have access to more classified information than it currently does, and Trump apparently agrees.Said anything about 5 eyes?
The article points out his "othering" of Latinx/Hispanic/Mexican people.
This is a traditional tactic of the right.
And it's not the first time he's done that. His comments about Jewish Americans being loyal to Israel. As being not quite American. Isolating his perceived enemies, setting off dog whistles to get his message across.
Wanting Norwegian migrants rather than people from "shithole countries".
Putting the blame on the Chinese for what he called "Kung Flu".
Not renting out properties to Black American tenants in the 70s.
And of course, birtherism. The othering of Obama. Whatever you think of 44's politics, you can't have missed Trump's attempts to paint him as not an American.
We haven't even gone near his vile actions and rhetoric against women, yet. The "nasty women", how all his accusers were lying and not his "type".
Apart from those he could just "grab" and get away with it.
The article points out his "othering" of Latinx/Hispanic/Mexican people.
This is a traditional tactic of the right.
And it's not the first time he's done that. His comments about Jewish Americans being loyal to Israel. As being not quite American. Isolating his perceived enemies, setting off dog whistles to get his message across.
Wanting Norwegian migrants rather than people from "shithole countries".
Putting the blame on the Chinese for what he called "Kung Flu".
Not renting out properties to Black American tenants in the 70s.
And of course, birtherism. The othering of Obama. Whatever you think of 44's politics, you can't have missed Trump's attempts to paint him as not an American.
We haven't even gone near his vile actions and rhetoric against women, yet. The "nasty women", how all his accusers were lying and not his "type".
Apart from those he could just "grab" and get away with it.
I think the public should have access to more classified information than it currently does, and Trump apparently agrees.
That says nothing about why the phrase "bad hombres" is racist. Can you help us with that?
It's amazing innit. The whole "IS v. DOES" distinction just whizzed into the wild blue yonder.
No it's wrong. It's what Trump says v what the courts allowed him to do. Trump did not have a change of mind.This is correct.
No it's wrong. It's what Trump says v what the courts allowed him to do. Trump did not have a change of mind.
There was nothing racist about that comment.