tim
EXPLODED TIM! (Help me!!!)
January 2029He's abso-fucking-lutely deranged. He's despotic. When are the men (and/or women) in white coats going to intervene and take him away in a straitjacket to a padded cell?
January 2029He's abso-fucking-lutely deranged. He's despotic. When are the men (and/or women) in white coats going to intervene and take him away in a straitjacket to a padded cell?
I'm sorry, I'm still very far behind: why the fuck is he even interested in Greenland anyway?!
Is there any kind of historical link? Is Greenland actually just the convenient catalyst for some larger objective?
Given we have first dibs on Greenland, we can have that and the US Cornwall.He'll be laying claim to Cornwall next.
I'm sorry, I'm still very far behind: why the fuck is he even interested in Greenland anyway?!
Is there any kind of historical link? Is Greenland actually just the convenient catalyst for some larger objective?
Ah yes someone's already proposed adding his face to Mount Rushmore I seeI think his ultimate goal is to be considered a president consequential enough to have his face added to Mount Rushmore, and he sees expanding the country as the best way to achieve that, with Greenland the easiest target
I think his ultimate goal is to be considered a president consequential enough to have his face added to Mount Rushmore, and he sees expanding the country as the best way to achieve that, with Greenland the easiest target
Fine words but Colombia capitulated
....or Scotland. His mother was Scottish and he's already got two golf courses there.He'll be laying claim to Cornwall next.
It is massive. It’s the world’s biggest island. It’s bigger than France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Italy, Greece, Switzerland, and Belgium combined.also he wants to call it trumpland cause he thinks it is massive due to not understanding.maps
All the Colombian president did was to make trump look stronger
Well the Cheeto is dumb enough to think that would be possible.Looks pretty big next the lower 48 states, maybe Trump envisions towing it south and calling it New New Jersey
View attachment 461471
Not quite, All South American countries will be reconsidering their trade link dependance on the USA as some already have ( Eg Brazil), as it has now proven itself to be a capritcious and unreliable partner.All the Colombian president did was to make trump look stronger
Maybe his arse would be betterAh yes someone's already proposed adding his face to Mount Rushmore I see
This whole "raise tarrifs " idea is surely going to backfire on the US. The extra costs will be passed on to US consumers surely?
The US probably won't have its own producers for everything. So US consumers will have to pay up.
Isn't he shooting the economy in the foot and making ordinary consumers pay for it?
So boring and predictable innit. Only that this is the world stage, not a strawberry stall on Barking High St...his 'art of the deal' schtick to open with something overwhelming and aggressive, then extract maximum concessions.
A lot of what he's threatening or acting on atm is bad strategy.Thing is it wouldn't work even short term with any other country (well maybe China), because you need to already be unassailable to bully in that way. The US does have that leverage in at least some cases.
Long term it's quite likely bad strategy, ignoring how the web of mutual relationships works on the global stage. The 'not a reliable partner' bit is a killer.
When you read some of his statements about how tarrifs work, it would appear that he has a totally arse-backwards view of them. The impression he puts out is that 'his' tarrifs are more akin to a 'subscription fee' for being able to trade with 'the greatest country on earth(TM)' that's levied on the goods before they leave the supplier's country rather than what's charged dockside at the US ports in the form of a regressive blanket tax that the US consumer has to pony up for. I don't think the inflation of the price from point 'A' to point 'B' has even entered his thought process. Sort of like the end-point price of the item should be no different, its just the country trading with the US has to pay for the privilege. It's fucking mental.This whole "raise tarrifs " idea is surely going to backfire on the US. The extra costs paid by the importer will surely be passed on to US consumers?
The US probably won't have its own producers for everything. So US consumers will have to pay up.
Isn't he shooting the economy in the foot and making ordinary consumers pay for it?
When you read some of his statements about how tarrifs work, it would appear that he has a totally arse-backwards view of them. The impression he puts out is that 'his' tarrifs are more akin to a 'subscription fee' for being able to trade with 'the greatest country on earth(TM)' that's levied on the goods before they leave the supplier's country rather than what's charged dockside at the US ports in the form of a regressive blanket tax that the US consumer has to pony up for. I don't think the inflation of the price from point 'A' to point 'B' has even entered his thought process. Sort of like the end-point price of the item should be no different, its just the country trading with the US has to pay for the privilege. It's fucking mental.
It’s so irresponsible. It doesn’t make him look big just an imbecile. Countries could refuse exports from America of fowl. Along with deportations where companies and farmers could go bust it will affect the American economy I think. He’s running America like he’s run his businesses for years.