Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

I'm sorry, I'm still very far behind: why the fuck is he even interested in Greenland anyway?!

Is there any kind of historical link? Is Greenland actually just the convenient catalyst for some larger objective?
As well as mining for rare earth elements, there's also mining for precious stones, eg rubies. But it's probably the rare earth elements that Trump's mostly interested in. Or rather the crypto, AI and other tech bros who have his ear are interested in them.
 
Trump has disbanded The Federal School Safety Clearinghouse External Advisory Board,
that works to prevent school shootings. How much more of a cunt does he have to be
before he loses his supporters, or are they so fucking hateful, or stupid, that he'll not lose them?
Because God forbid they lose their Second Amendment rights to bear arms (and shoot children and teachers dead with them).
 
I'm sorry, I'm still very far behind: why the fuck is he even interested in Greenland anyway?!

Is there any kind of historical link? Is Greenland actually just the convenient catalyst for some larger objective?

I think his ultimate goal is to be considered a president consequential enough to have his face added to Mount Rushmore, and he sees expanding the country as the best way to achieve that, with Greenland the easiest target
 
The Colombian government will continue to receive deported Colombians, “guaranteeing them dignified conditions,” Murillo said in a video statement late Sunday. "We have overcome the impasse with the United States government.”

I think the issue might have been the shackles placed on deportees - Colombia was already accepting an average of around two deportation flights a week under the Biden administration

 
All the Colombian president did was to make trump look stronger :mad:
Not quite, All South American countries will be reconsidering their trade link dependance on the USA as some already have ( Eg Brazil), as it has now proven itself to be a capritcious and unreliable partner.

The comrades in China are laughing their collective arses off , and won't miss an opportunity to take advantage.

No more eggs all in a US basket.

BRICS has also been given a motivational shove.

felon 34's egos been stroked in the short term, longer term, generational damage to US's standing/reputation in what it considers to be it's own back yard.
 
This whole "raise tarrifs " idea is surely going to backfire on the US. The extra costs paid by the importer will surely be passed on to US consumers?
The US probably won't have its own producers for everything. So US consumers will have to pay up.

Isn't he shooting the economy in the foot and making ordinary consumers pay for it?
 
Last edited:
This whole "raise tarrifs " idea is surely going to backfire on the US. The extra costs will be passed on to US consumers surely?
The US probably won't have its own producers for everything. So US consumers will have to pay up.

Isn't he shooting the economy in the foot and making ordinary consumers pay for it?

Some of it is brinkmanship. People forget he did something very similar in his last term and it fits with his 'art of the deal' schtick to open with something overwhelming and aggressive, then extract maximum concessions.

But in some cases yes it will involve rising prices, and promises to bring back jobs to the US are optimistic to say the least - four years of tarrifs won't be persuading Ford to move its Transit production out of Turkey to revisit Detroit, for example. And agriculture doesn't move at all.
 
Thing is it wouldn't work even short term with any other country (well maybe China), because you need to already be unassailable to bully in that way. The US does have that leverage in at least some cases.

Long term it's quite likely bad strategy, ignoring how the web of mutual relationships works on the global stage. The 'not a reliable partner' bit is a killer.
 
Thing is it wouldn't work even short term with any other country (well maybe China), because you need to already be unassailable to bully in that way. The US does have that leverage in at least some cases.

Long term it's quite likely bad strategy, ignoring how the web of mutual relationships works on the global stage. The 'not a reliable partner' bit is a killer.
A lot of what he's threatening or acting on atm is bad strategy.
 
Back
Top Bottom