Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

Not sure how many witnesses Trump has but one seems to have dropped out. He was the prosecuter's former law partner and divorce attorney but on the stand 'couldn't recall' quite a lot.


A key witness who was supposed to testify against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis seemed unable to answer a single question on Tuesday.

Donald Trump and several of his co-defendants in their Georgia election interference case have accused Willis of an improper relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Trump’s team says that Willis and Wade began dating in 2019, while the couple says they didn’t start seeing each other until 2022, after Willis hired Wade for the Georgia case.

Trump’s lawyers have argued the romantic relationship provides a legal basis to disqualify Willis and throw out her case against Trump entirely. On Tuesday, lawyers Ashleigh Merchant and Steve Sadow questioned Terrence Bradley to try to establish a timeline of the couple’s relationship. Bradley is Wade’s former law partner and divorce attorney, and was meant to be a key witness in the case against Willis.

Merchant had multiple text messages from Bradley stating that the couple began dating in 2019. But when she began questioning him, suddenly, Bradley didn’t know a thing—including when they actually began dating, how the relationship began, and the trips they took together.

When asked why he initially said Willis and Wade began dating in 2019, Bradley said he was just “speculating.”
 
When are SCOTUS going to put us out of our misery and drop their immunity appeal decision? A lot hangs on whether they accept or decline this.
 
presidential immunity suck it up :)

about time the good olde boys learn what their great grand fathers had to learn the hard way

it what they really want anyways

the gravy seals Vs the most funded military in the world
 
FFS

The Supreme Court will decide if ex-President Donald Trump is immune from being prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election.
The decision has the potential to seriously delay the trial, which was originally scheduled for March.
Arguments in the Supreme Court case are scheduled for the week of 22 April, and any trial will have to wait until after a decision is made.
Although a decision could come swiftly, the justices could rule that the former president is immune from prosecution, or issue a decision that further delays legal action.
Justice Department guidelines limit prosecutorial action in politically sensitive investigations from within 60 days of an election - meaning prosecutors face a deadline of early September.
And if Mr Trump wins in November, there is a growing possibility that the case never reaches trial. His Justice Department officials could drop or indefinitely suspend the special counsel investigation or he could take the unprecedented step of issuing a pardon for himself.

 
If that decision goes in trump's favour (i.e. Presidents are immune from prosecution for things they do whilst in power) then Biden can simply shoot trump in the face.

It’s very unlikely they will rule in Trump’s favour. The worry is that hearing the appeal could significantly delay his trial, possibly until after the election.
 
She's got a very short memory if she considers the August 2019 - January 2021 period when Johnson and Trump were both in power to be some kind of lost golden age
Was it Trump hospitalised for Covid after Boris - or the other way round?
 
even trump was not dumb enough to think going to a COVID hospital and shaking hand with the patients within was a good idea .. so Bojo first


Trump tried to make it up later by saying you could inject bleach into your ass to cure it mind
 
Was it Trump hospitalised for Covid after Boris - or the other way round?

Johnson was an early adopter hospitalised with COVID in early April 2020 - Trump wasn't hospitalised until six months later, he received an experimental treatment and it's not clear whether he would have survived if he'd gotten sick at the same time as Johnson
 
even trump was not dumb enough to think going to a COVID hospital and shaking hand with the patients within was a good idea .. so Bojo first


Trump tried to make it up later by saying you could inject bleach into your ass to cure it mind
TBF to Boris the news coming out of US at the time was maybe a handful of people would die..
 
TBF to Boris the news coming out of US at the time was maybe a handful of people would die..

tbf to Boris the news coming out of the UK was fat middle aged people should be extra careful.

but Bojo had to try to common touch approach and it almost killed him

listening to no one clap for the fucker was a nice addition mind
 
Johnson was an early adopter hospitalised with COVID in early April 2020 - Trump wasn't hospitalised until six months later, he received an experimental treatment and it's not clear whether he would have survived if he'd gotten sick at the same time as Johnson

A classic example of bad timing.
 
tbf to Boris the news coming out of the UK was fat middle aged people should be extra careful.

but Bojo had to try to common touch approach and it almost killed him

listening to no one clap for the fucker was a nice addition mind
He was boldly leading the charge towards herd immunity
 
The pro-fascist MAGA scum of SCOTUS have effectively allowed Trump to avoid any legal accountability for his coup attempt before the election.

"It is now basically impossible to conceive of the trial concluding, and the jury rendering a verdict, before the election."


It's now down to the American voters: will they embrace rape, pedophilia and fascism or will they vote against these things?
 
The pro-fascist MAGA scum of SCOTUS have effectively allowed Trump to avoid any legal accountability for his coup attempt before the election.

"It is now basically impossible to conceive of the trial concluding, and the jury rendering a verdict, before the election."


It's now down to the American voters: will they embrace rape, pedophilia and fascism or will they vote against these things?
A podcast I listen to reminded its listeners that the SC is mostly "Republicans in Robes". This was always a chance, and a threat.
 
Back
Top Bottom