Do you think there's anything wrong with putting your penis in a dead pig's mouth?

[littlebabyjesus]

You only know if something is wrong when presented with a scale?

No, I didn't say that. Asking 'wrong by what criteria?' is not the same as asking for a scale. Are you talking about morality here? If so, say so.

You're the one who's confusing the issue. The likes of maomao are doing their best to clarify things.

 

[Pickman's model]

No, I didn't say that. Asking 'wrong by what criteria?' is not the same as asking for a scale. Are you talking about morality here? If so, say so.

You're the one who's confusing the issue. The likes of maomao are doing their best to clarify things.

yeh it's always disappointing to see the paucity of that best.

 

[Lazy Llama]

Sorry to bother you, Lazy Llama, but if you're not in a cafe in Seville, can this be altered?

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

 

[Pickman's model]

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

I would hope that you would never make a private poll public as a matter of policy.

 

[maomao]

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

You could delete the poll and start a new public one.

 

[Pickman's model]

You could delete the poll and start a new public one.

out of the mouths of babies...

 

[andysays]

out of the mouths of babies...

...and into the mouths of pigs?

Anyway, I do think there is something wrong with putting your penis in a dead pig's mouth, though on a scale of wrongness it's not, in itself, all that high.

 

[Chilli.s]

Only wrong if the pig penetrator comes into a job that requires some kind of moral abettor like position.

By the time a person gets to university its hoped that they appreciate that any and every action can have consequences.

 

[Lazy Llama]

You could delete the poll and start a new public one.

Yes, but then a) no one would vote for the No option and b) you wouldn't find out who had already voted.

You can change your answer, should you wish to

 

[SpineyNorman]

In and of itself, no.

Let us say a man has a pig-head fetish. Just can't get off on anything else. So he goes to the butchers and procures pig heads to take home and fuck.

If that's what takes his fancy, who am I to tell him he's doing something wrong?

Who are you to tell him it's wrong? Someone who doesn't fuck dead pigs, that's who.

You don't, do you?

 

[danny la rouge]

No, I didn't say that. Asking 'wrong by what criteria?' is not the same as asking for a scale. Are you talking about morality here? If so, say so.

You're the one who's confusing the issue. The likes of maomao are doing their best to clarify things.

I have carefully asked a question - Is there anything wrong with putting you penis in a dead pig's mouth? - and provided two answers - No, there's nothing wrong with that. Or, Yes, there's something wrong with that.

I deliberately said that I leave it open to the respondents to define "wrong" for themselves.

 

[SpineyNorman]

Most of us have probably eaten pig cock and pig head. The pig Cameron stuck his penis in was probably slaughtered for our enjoyment not his. Is it anymore wrong than killing and eating the thing?

yes

 

[danny la rouge]

As a respondent to the question, I can give you my reasoning for the answer I gave (Yes, there's something wrong with that), but I don't want to define for others how they should interpret "wrong".

 

[friedaweed]

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

Which is the correct way to deal with this conundrum. You know who the pig fuckers are though don't you chief

 

[danny la rouge]

For all the reasons you'd expect, that's not possible - the admin poll editor doesn't have a public/private switch.

Yes, it's unfortunate that people had voted by the time I was made aware of my error. But thanks for the response anyway.

 

[Pickman's model]

Which is the correct way to deal with this conundrum. You know who the pig fuckers are though don't you chief

they went to colleges like trinity, caius and gonville, and magdalen.

 

[friedaweed]

they went to colleges like trinity, caius and gonville, and magdalen.

I was invited to speak at Magdalen once. I turned the offer down If only I'd known then what doors and dead animals mouths it could have opened for me

 

[two sheds]

I have carefully asked a question - Is there anything wrong with putting you penis in a dead pig's mouth? - and provided two answers - No, there's nothing wrong with that. Or, Yes, there's something wrong with that.

I deliberately said that I leave it open to the respondents to define "wrong" for themselves.

Neither have you defined "pig"

 

[discokermit]

my mate worked at a slaughterhouse on the maintenance. he reckoned the pigs sometimes had sex on the way in and the bloke who was in charge of the pigs at the time would be leaning on the fence watching them and wanking inside his overalls.
he was obviously a wrong un. this is worse.

 

[emanymton]

Can I just say that I see nothing wrong with putting dead pig in my mouth. In fact I rather enjoy it.

 

[Pickman's model]

.

 

[Spymaster]

In fact it's much much worse than fucking a dead pig's head.

I haven't heard or read any suggestion that he fucked it (i.e. Pumped and came into it). From what I gather, in a private gathering, he stuck his knob in its mouth, took it out, and that was that. If that's the case it's certainly distasteful but I couldn't give much of a fuck. Similar (and worse) stuff went on when I was at uni. Someone on another thread has described a university acquaintance shitting into a pint glass in the SU and leaving it on a table, which I find infinitely more revolting.

 

[chilango]

A few points:

Beastiality is not ok. Necrophilia is not ok. So surely combining the two is not ok?

Secondly, if it's not "fucking" it's power as taboo is still surely drawn from its sexual nature? ...and regardless to go back to my first point - would it be ok to stick you flaccid penis in the mouth of a live animal or dead person?

 

[DotCommunist]

I haven't heard or read any suggestion that he fucked it (i.e. Pumped and came into it). From what I gather, in a private gathering, he stuck his knob in its mouth, took it out, and that was that. If that's the case it's certainly distasteful but I couldn't give much of a fuck. Similar (and worse) stuff went on when I was at uni. Someone on another thread has described a university acquaintance shitting into a pint glass in the SU and leaving it on a table, which I find infinitely more revolting.

did you read the leveller.org piece? it articulates a lot of this. Over on the piggate thread I asked people how much they'd need to be paid to just place genitals in hogmouth- no arousal or requirment to pull out and spunk on the communion wafer or anything like that. Just sixty seconds flaccid in the hogmouth. No pics, just an observer to verify the act. I priced myself with 3k but was immediatly undercut by someone who wold do it for a score if he got to keep the head to go home and eat.

In the same way that it doesn't matter if its true anymore, the depravity or hi jinks (depending where your judgement on such matters falls) is also irrelevant. Its the sordid nature of sexual initiation rites to weirdo clubs on behalf of our upper classes that resonates

If I may be allowed to pontificate on scanty knowledge for a while:

The anti clericalism and anti catholocism of the english peasantry during the reformation years found its fears justified in some sections and branches of the gentry keeping secret priests, doing ritualistic worship, generally considered to be devillish because by this point jonny peasant was convinced the pope was the anti-christ. The echoes of this are with us today simply because its all true after all. They really are kiddy fiddling animal banging wronguns. Not catholics I mean, the upper classes. What I'm clumsily detailing is my theory on how people got the idea of upper class perversion as common currency and 'we all know what they get up to'

these pale imitators probably think they are in direct tradition from such as the Hellfire Club in terms of social and spiritual trangressive beahviour excused by their exalted positions- bound to excess and the profane simply by virtue of because I can.


maybe

 

[laptop]

these pale imitators probably think they are in direct tradition from such as the Hellfire Club in terms of social and spiritual trangressive beahviour

I'm sure they do.

I was once intrigued by the trangressive nature of the Hellfire Club. I rapidly concluded it was much like this shower.

 

[Pickman's model]

I'm sure they do.

I was once intrigued by the trangressive nature of the Hellfire Club. I rapidly concluded it was much like this shower.

not sure francis dashwood ever instituted pig head fucking

 

[DotCommunist]

not sure francis dashwood ever instituted pig head fucking

I bet he would if he'd thought of it

 

[Pickman's model]

I bet he would if he'd thought of it

he didn't have the criminal mind of our prime minister

 

[phildwyer]

these pale imitators probably think they are in direct tradition from such as the Hellfire Club

Far from being "pale imitators," Cameron and his friends far exceed the Hellfire Club in the extent of their evil. And the pig has nothing to do with it.