Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Discoveries and theories in human evolution and prehistory

Genetic evidence for pre-Columbian contact between Polynesia and South America.


This is a fascinating discovery, but it really shouldn't be surprising. Polynesians have a long tradition of oceanic navigation. Why wouldn't they have made it all the way across the Pacific to the Americas?
 
Polynesians had pigs which they could have traded.


There’s evidence they brought chickens to South America:
 
There’s evidence they brought chickens to South America:
Liza Matisoo-Smith is a coauthor on that one. I knew her in Auckland - she's very famous in the study of polynesian chicken DNA (really).
 
Documentary about the archaeology of the Greek island of Keros with Colin Renfrew and others.

The excavations at Dhaskalio (directed by Colin Renfrew and Michael Boyd of the McDonald Institute, University of Cambridge) have completely transformed our understanding of what was previously seen as a Cycladic enigma. The today uninhabited island of Keros, in Cyclades, Greece, was the site of the world’s earliest maritime sanctuary in the Early Bronze Age, and a thriving center for metal production, providing much evidence for all crucial developments in architecture.
 
Last edited:

I'm not terribly surprised by this. A lot of native tribes in North America have stories of female hunters, some taking up the role officially as men and taking wives. (There are also stories of the opposite happening--men taking up roles as women.)

Also, I've used primitive weapons such as bows and arrows and atl atls and having greater upper body strength isn't really an advantage. Sometimes that upper body strength is less than helpful because there's a tendency to overdraw the bow, or overpower a throw, and that causes a loss of accuracy and control. What can be an issue for women is draw length, because the shorter the draw length, the less power an arrow will have coming off the bow. You may get an accurate shot, but the shot won't be forceful enough to kill the animal. This isn't a huge issue and can be compensated for by using a bow with a higher draw weight.
 
Last edited:
More amazing stuff which might or might not be Denisovan - looks just like a bit of broken caramel wafer, but might encode the whole meaning of life and humanity for all we know:
(the object itself is pretty intriguing but the questions raised are even larger, i.e. if art / the mental capacity needed for art is 'what makes us human' then what about all the art which it looks like archaic hominins were churning out?)
Going to very much doubt it is a caramel wafer. Even amongst Homo Sapiens such technology doesn't emerge till much later on. Tunnock's for example, were responding largely to the rationing of sugar and room-temperature fats imposed during the post WWII period in their introduction of the split caramel wafer. Denisovan hominins would not have access to either the sugar spinning or cocoa enrobing techniques crucial to the process. They may have been able to make something very crude involving saliva and sugar beet for example, but I doubt it would much resemble what we commonly think of as a caramel wafer.
 
Amazing this
there's a new channel 4 doc featuring these out now :cool:

 
How the hell have they survived out in the open in the jungle?!

They look similar to the rock art in the Serra da Capivara in Brazil which I think has mainly survived where there are rock overhangs or some form of natural protection from the elements, though there it had the help of climate change that left the Serra in a very arid area without much permanent habitation.
 
Got the book this reviews on my want list (sorry for subscription-limited link but even without a sub you may be able to see the whole article, or if not that the first couple of paragraphs and the details of the book) - as everyone on this thread already kno, it's a much more sporadic, bitty and complicated story than the old wall chart of ape to man would have us believe...

Twenty Types of Human
 
I'd read that farmers in the coldest bits of the north here would tantamount to hibernate even in recorded historical times; nothing to be done outside so stay indoors and mainly in bed, though how often they were eating I forget.
 
This is interesting - early humans may have hibernated.


Puddy_Tat may be able to use this as justification for sleeping through the winter.
Calling them "human" is getting into questions over who is human. Gernally their has been a restriction of its use to H. sapiens.



1024px-Homo_sapiens_lineage.svg.png

At 4-500 000 years ago they would have been on the cusp of H. heidelbergensis and H. neanderthal. Its far more likely this is a extinct off shoot of the Homo family bush.
The idea of Hominina hibernation raises some big questions. Firstly primates pretty much lost the ability to synthesis vitamin C about 60 million years ago and we know humans cannot synthesis vitamin D without sunlight on the skin. Any period of a couple of months without food sources to supplement (given the creatures remaining in a torpor away from the sun) would lead to annual malnutrition.
We have other minerals that are vital to body function we need to keep topped up. People trying extended fasts of a couple of weeks can run into health problems if they do not supplement for vital nutrients.
We know humans need about 1800kcal a day for basal metabolic activities including brain activity. Our brain burns away at about 300kcal. Its a pretty expensive organ to have parked up doing nothing. H heidelbergensis would have had a smaller brain. But not that much smaller. At 1800kcal you are burning about 1kg of body fat every 4 days. Physiological adaptations to induce actual hibernation including lowering body temperature (and surviving) are huge. It would require major changes in cell and organ chemistry.
How they jumped to hominids sprouting hibernation in one location rather than finding evidence for seasonal starvation is not mentioned in the article.

These were found in Spain, this is not somewhere we associated with SAD (Seasonal Affected Disorder), though it likely does occur there. SAD is a relatively well described pathology, it is down to a disturbance in the circadian rhythm caused by the short duration of sun at high latitudes (basically northern ones) and the relatively low levels of artificial light indoors (being outdoors in daylight for an hour or so likely helps reduce the symptoms in many cases). The bodies production of serotonin and its transformation into melatonin through the daylight and into the evening is disturbed. This is likely magnified by our usage of artificial light and stimulation into the evening. As this seems to be well observed in people with recent African or South Asian origin then there seems no way for this to have any kind of "evolutionary adaptation", rather its a mixture of us living outside or more normal range and the disturbances of modern life.
We only recently pushed into these high northern latitudes as the great glaciers retreated at the end of the last glaciation. The one evolutionary adaptation people think may have happened is a loss of melanin in the skin to aid the absorption of sunlight for vitamin D production.

As for hibernation in H. sapiens in the modern era, this is far more likely to have been the annual starvation of agrarian peasants as food stocks run low over winter. There is a strong abundance of evidence of widespread chronic (that is sustained over much of their lives) malnutrition of people in the period before last century or so. Most families would go through a few winters where at least one of the children did not make it. Calling that "hibernation" is callous.
 
Calling them "human" is getting into questions over who is human. Gernally their has been a restriction of its use to H. sapiens.

I remember back when I was studying primatology in Uni, we used the term "human" when referring to anyone from the Homo genus.
A quick Google doesn't suggest that this has changed.

edit: there's only one remaining species of human anyhow, so I don't see what issue there could be with using the term for the genus.
 
Last edited:
Got the book this reviews on my want list (sorry for subscription-limited link but even without a sub you may be able to see the whole article, or if not that the first couple of paragraphs and the details of the book) - as everyone on this thread already kno, it's a much more sporadic, bitty and complicated story than the old wall chart of ape to man would have us believe...

Twenty Types of Human
Cheers - have a subscription with them which I took out when I was pissed a few months back, so will have a read.
 
Back
Top Bottom