Blagsta
Minimum cage, maximum cage
You don't care that your hero promotes racist forgeries?I don't care about the protocols of the elders of zion, so what's your point?
You don't care that your hero promotes racist forgeries?I don't care about the protocols of the elders of zion, so what's your point?
Yes, but not that said hologram would be experienced by us as a hollowed-out planetoid if we could hypothetically project ourselves across space to find such a thing out.
I know it's said to be highly dubious, but, really, I don't know much about it. Satisfied?
loon said:the Earth and the collective human mind is manipulated from the Moon, which, he says, is not a ‘heavenly body’, but an artificial construct – a gigantic ‘spacecraft’ (probably a hollowed-out 'planetoid') – which is home to the extraterrestrial group that has been manipulating humanity for aeons.
He describes what he calls the ‘Moon Matrix’, a fake reality broadcast from the Moon which is decoded by the human body/mind in much the same way as portrayed in the Matrix movie trilogy. The Moon Matrix has ‘hacked’ into the human ‘body-computer’ system, he says, and it is feeding us a manipulated sense of self and the world 24/7.
faux pas said:...that certain bloodlines have pervaded throughout time often manifesting themselves as the ruling class,
Also, what is it that you find interesting about this sort of argument faux pas?
...are we?Funny thing is if he was talking about European nobility he or she wouldn't be a million miles off. As it is we're on about reptiles....
You still don't get it. We experience the hologram as reality - as minerals and metals and cheese and stuff. Some gifted types are able to see through the projection to get a glimpse of what 'really' lies behind it. Such people are often confused by what they see - they can easily misinterpret it at first, it can lead them to make predictions that are not quite right, but once properly understood, that only goes to show how true what they say must be.What? What does that sentence even mean? Do you know what a hologram is? It's light. Do you know what the moon is made of? Minerals and metals. And in case you haven't got the news, we did "project ourselves" onto the moon many times in the shape of manned and unmanned machines. Fucking loony.
...are we?
That be £37.50 please.You still don't get it. We experience the hologram as reality - as minerals and metals and cheese and stuff. Some gifted types are able to see through the projection to get a glimpse of what 'really' lies behind it. Such people are often confused by what they see - they can easily misinterpret it at first, it can lead them to make predictions that are not quite right, but once properly understood, that only goes to show how true what they say must be.
You still don't get it. We experience the hologram as reality - as minerals and metals and cheese and stuff. Some gifted types are able to see through the projection to get a glimpse of what 'really' lies behind it. Such people are often confused by what they see - they can easily misinterpret it at first, it can lead them to make predictions that are not quite right, but once properly understood, that only goes to show how true what they say must be.
You still don't get it. We experience the hologram as reality - as minerals and metals and cheese and stuff. Some gifted types are able to see through the projection to get a glimpse of what 'really' lies behind it. Such people are often confused by what they see - they can easily misinterpret it at first, it can lead them to make predictions that are not quite right, but once properly understood, that only goes to show how true what they say must be.
That's straight out of a Philip K Dick novel.What i find particularly interesting about this is that Icke produced a 700 page book, embarked on a global lecture tour, produced DVDS and CD arguing in great detail that:
And faux pas isn't 'sure that is one of his stronger convictions' - not one of those sort of things you're not sure about really is it? Or don't really commit to if you don't believe it. (Unless of course you're just a rip-off merchant - but...)
The Protocols have been judged to be a forgery because it was wrongly believed that they had been written by Jewish elders. In that sense, those that exposed the forgery were half-right. They were indeed not written by Jewish elders and they were attributed to them in order to discredit and dissemble. A clever distraction by the real authors - presenting themselves to the world in a way that will cause them to be discredited, and so enable them to remain hidden (they were worried at the time that others were onto them): very clever to hide in plain view like that. Very clever indeed.Said to be highly dubious...?
funnily enough, dick was a bit an ickelike figure in later lifeThat's straight out of a Philip K Dick novel.
funnily enough, dick was a bit an ickelike figure in later life
Speed will do that to a man. At least he didn't go on stadium tours, he had enough shame to present it as fiction (for the most part, not sure about VALIS).
i have that on my hard-drive to watch very soon.1977? Fassbinder had already exposed the matrix in 1973 in World on a Wire
I know it's said to be highly dubious, but, really, I don't know much about it. Satisfied?
i wasn't claiming that he was exactly the same. i just wanted to post that clip to be honest.And throughout he says "I'm not sure what it was", plus he attributes it at least in part to using sodium pentathol. So not really the same is it?
i wasn't claiming that he was exactly the same. i just wanted to post that clip to be honest.
anyway, plato got there first:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave
who said he was?Icke's not a Platonist by any stretch of the imagination.
who said he was?
The point remains as to whether David Icke contradicts himself. This is not the same as claiming something is contradictory simply because it's claimed to be false. You say that what makes up the moon, its 'minerals and metals', are not really just a hologram as Icke would claim. Fine, but the question remains, does Icke's claim that we would experience the moon as a hollowed-out planetoid, if we could ourselves hypothetically project there (rather than going on information from NASA), contradict the claim that, how we would experience it wouldn't be how it actually is, that being a hologram? Where's the contradiction?What? What does that sentence even mean? Do you know what a hologram is? It's light. Do you know what the moon is made of? Minerals and metals. And in case you haven't got the news, we did "project ourselves" onto the moon many times in the shape of manned and unmanned machines. Fucking loony.
I gave you a short list of Icke points as apparently you needed me to in order for you to defend a claim another poster made and you seemed to be supporting. That's all.Also, what is it that you find interesting about this sort of argument faux pas?
Why are people taken in by any loon? A need for meaning, for belonging, for feeling special and knowing.