butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The claim that it's a hologram - a 'projection' (that it is a hologram not that we experience it as a hologram) and that space aliens live in secret bases there are most certainly contradictions.
I asked you what you found 'interesting' in the most recent of Icke's books you had read. Is this secret bloodlines/ruling class thing one of those aspects that you find interesting.I gave you a short list of Icke points as apparently you needed me to in order for you to defend a claim another poster made and you seemed to be supporting. That's all.
Maya, or the veil of illusion, in Hinduism.i have that on my hard-drive to watch very soon.
though dick spoke of similar concepts earlier than 73, as no doubt many other writers did.
My 'hero'? David Icke stresses what he calls 'Rothchild Zionism'. Never yet heard or read him say anything racist.You don't care that your hero promotes racist forgeries?
I think the exposure of the underlying looniness just under the surface of the ickettes is impact enough - for me anyway.Partly I think because it's very easy to point out things that are wrong with the world and with governments. Make a series of statements starting off where people agree with you and then shift off into the conspiracy stuff and it becomes almost a standard sales pitch that you take people with you.
I don't understand this stuff about holographic moon being confusing - it's a hollowgram
I'm still a page away from the end of the thread but you're not landing any real punches with this one so far butchers. The points you're trying to make aren't important enough and it just seems to be descending into irritable semantics.
even though some view me as some sort of conspiracy theorist, I agree with the above whole heartedly. If something is a hologram, and not a hologram as in we are are on some quantum level which only matterson the quantum level, then there is no moon to speak of, so there are no moon landings, no reflectors on the moon to bounce back lasers ect ect.....and obviously, there could be no secret German/Russian/Alien bases on a hologram. Is it a hollow craft of some kind? I guess that's possible, rather unlikely, but possible.The claim that it's a hologram - a 'projection' (that it is a hologram not that we experience it as a hologram) and that space aliens live in secret bases there are most certainly contradictions.
funnily enough, dick was a bit an ickelike figure in later life
SomewhatI asked you what you found 'interesting' in the most recent of Icke's books you had read. Is this secret bloodlines/ruling class thing one of those aspects that you find interesting.
Yet you still haven't shown how.Thanks for your little list btw - interesting that the very first item highlighted one of the ways in which his theories contradict each other.
That's it exactly - either claim could be true but not both.even though some view me as some sort of conspiracy theorist, I agree with the above whole heartedly. If something is a hologram, and not a hologram as in we are are on some quantum level which only matterson the quantum level, then there is no moon to speak of, so there are no moon landings, no reflectors on the moon to bounce back lasers ect ect.....and obviously, there could be no secret German/Russian/Alien bases on a hologram. Is it a hollow craft of some kind? I guess that's possible, rather unlikely, but possible.
I have, and xes gave you a good summary of how just above as well.Somewhat
Yet you still haven't shown how.
Yes, your hero, who you are valiantly attempting to defend. Your hero who promotes well known anti-semitic forgeries and far right tropes as real.My 'hero'? David Icke stresses what he calls 'Rothchild Zionism'. Never yet heard or read him say anything racist.
I think the exposure of the underlying looniness just under the surface of the ickettes is impact enough - for me anyway.
The point remains as to whether David Icke contradicts himself. This is not the same as claiming something is contradictory simply because it's claimed to be false. You say that what makes up the moon, its 'minerals and metals', are not really just a hologram as Icke would claim. Fine, but the question remains, does Icke's claim that we would experience the moon as a hollowed-out planetoid, if we could ourselves hypothetically project there (rather than going on information from NASA), contradict the claim that, how we would experience it wouldn't be how it actually is, that being a hologram? Where's the contradiction?
i was referring to 'the matrix'
does anyone believe this shit? that the moon is a hologram? nobody can believe that surely??
well, some do. And maybe, just maaaaaybe, in some far off land far far away, they made holograms to be solid. And if that's true (like, I said IF) then maybe it is true. But I'm only playing devils advocate. This is not a belief which I hold. (juts to clarify)does anyone believe this shit? that the moon is a hologram? nobody can believe that surely??
I suspect, as faux pah has hinted at, that none of this is real - that's how some people will get round everything along those lines.what about the tides and periods etc? how do they explain that?
And in the light of the recent Russian stuff about life on Venus, the guy who has made these rather outlandish claims, also said that he thinks that our entire solar system is fake/manufactured. (which some would say discredits his recent claims) As all the other solar systems found so far, have the big gasseous planets closest to the sun, and ours is all back to front, this means that we are possbily a big fuck off experiment......which again, isn't the first time I've heard that as a theory, but it is a tad unlikely....(but just a tad )
yes, I do realise this, which is why I put mr winky at the end of my postYou do realise it's bloody hard to find planets outwith our own system at all, and as such the bigger the planet the easier it is to find. All big planets are gaseous, so no wonder they're finding lots of them and not so many solid ones.
the allegory of the cave is seen as one of the literary forerunners to the matrix - plato uses the analogy of someone who has lived in a cave and only perceived projected shadows on the cave wall as reality. to plato, a philosopher is someone who has broken out of the cave and is now seeing things as they really are.So? The matrix isn't remotely similar to Plato's teachings about the Ideal.
yes, I do realise this, which is why I put mr winky at the end of my post
It's ok, I understand whyJust checking.
The only conclusion can be that nothing is real - including our bodies. So 'we' - our 'souls', if you like - are not a product of our brains/bodies, but rather our brains/bodies are a product of something acorporeal that is the essence of 'us'. It's not far off what phildwyer proposes.periods are obviously real though, and so are the tides. i'm not saying you're wrong i'm just shocked at how someone can think this stuff.
if these people were walking along a beach and then saw a large wave coming towards them would they think "ah it's OK, this is just an illusion by the Moon Matrix" and carry on walking?
the allegory of the cave is seen as one of the literary forerunners to the matrix - plato uses the analogy of someone who has lived in a cave and only perceived projected shadows on the cave wall as reality. to plato, a philosopher is someone who has broken out of the cave and is now seeing things as they really are.
why do you think it's misleading? who do you think i'm misleading? i was just forwarding the none-too-controversial idea that there are plenty of literary and philosophical notions about subjective realities - the idea that we may be living in a reality constructed by someone or something else.Sure. In the same way that the Bible is one of the forerunners of L. Ron Hubbard's writings. I see where you're coming from, but the approximation is so crude as to be misleading IMO.