Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

David Icke lecture @ Wembley Arena, October 2012

This is David Icke's explanation of the term. The rest you can find here on his site: http://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/david-icke-lecture-wembley-arena-october-2012.287667/page-16

By David Icke - Davidicke.com

I have written and spoken extensively about the agenda behind the unfolding global financial crisis and here I will expose the coordinating force, or at least the prime one, behind that agenda and so much else, including 9/11.

Most conspiracy researchers either don't realise the fundamental significance of this network or are too frightened to say so if they do. Sod that.

It is widely known as Zionism or, as I call it, more accurately, I suggest ...Rothschild Zionism. I add the 'Rothschild' to constantly emphasise the true creators of Zionism and its controllers to this day (see Human Race Get Off Your Knees).

I'll explain the connection later to the gathering economic catastrophe, but some background is necessary to put it all in the context that it needs to be seen.

Ask most people about Zionism and they will say 'that's the Jews', but while this is the impression the Rothschild networks in politics and the media have sought very successfully to 'sell' as 'common knowledge', it is not true. It represents only a minority of them and many others who are not Jewish.

Ah yes, Icke's fantasy where he creates a whole stream of Zionism about a century before Zionism actually existed. How do we know this? Because until the mid-Victorian era Jewishness was indivisible from Judaism, and to Judaism of the time, Zionism would have been a blasphemy, an assumption by man of G-d's prerogative of calling the Jews unto Israel. To manufacture the Rothschild family (beloved among other branches of conspiracy theory as the genealogists of the Jesus bloodline, hene their middle-German surname translating to "red shield", geddit?) as the cretors of Zionism misses the point that at the time Icke attributes this creation to, it would have been philosophically-impossible for any Jew to do so, however good a repuation we have for being disputatious. Zionism was only manufacturable later in light of the anti-Semitic excesses of the Russian empire on the one hand, and the start of mass education on the other.
 
"Jewish people are very clever and good with money, oh and wonderful when they allow their true conspiracy-tastic holocaust-denying selves to come out"

nothing anti-semitic in that sentence, it's all positive
 
Butchers - I think the interesting trick any non-antisemitic conspiraloons have to do is agreeing with their guru whilst convincing themselves that there is a non-antisemitic reading of his texts. As ever it's a mental gymnastics that followers have to perform, but at the very least it suggests their commitment to the warm fuzzy feeling of privileged enlightenment is stronger than their anti-racism. And that's being (overly) charitable.
 
Butchers - I think the interesting trick any non-antisemitic conspiraloons have to do is agreeing with their guru whilst convincing themselves that there is a non-antisemitic reading of his texts. As ever it's a mental gymnastics that followers have to perform, but at the very least it suggests their commitment to the warm fuzzy feeling of privileged enlightenment is stronger than their anti-racism. And that's being (overly) charitable.
Indeed, seen it on here and in real life many times. Last point very important, and why it's important to challenge and expose both types (the racists and the fellow travelers) despite the often seeming trivial non-consequential nature of it (not that it requires very much effort with people who make it as easy as on this thread).
 
It's not positive is it, it's saying "if only they weren't either in league with shape-shifting reptile overlords, or if they were true to their nature and not bogged down by inherent Jesus-killer guilt I'd have'm over for dinner."
It's a stretch, which I've noticed members have had to do in trying to provide a straight forward racist or anti-semitic remark of Icke's.
 
It's a stretch, which I've noticed members have had to do in trying to provide a straight forward racist or anti-semitic remark of Icke's.
Well, at the very worst we've provided a series of dissembling implied racist and anti-semitic remarks (and they're not remarks, they're the core of this wider arguments).
 
It's a stretch, which I've noticed members have had to do in trying to provide a straight forward racist or anti-semitic remark of Icke's.

It's a stretch? Dude, every tendon in your body must be torn by now. Talk about bending over backwards to defend the undefendable. You've shown over and over again that you have no concept of logic, no understanding that words actually have certain meanings (hologram, remember?), no inkling of what anti-semitism means, and zero critical facilities. And you accuse me of stretching the truth? Oh my fucking dear.
 
i look forward to jazzz claiming this thread as yet another stunning victory for the force of his arguments, in a month or two's time. :cool:

Even he must be appalled at the sheer lack of argument, any argument, from a fellow traveller. At least he makes a fucking effort.
 
Back
Top Bottom