Raheem
Well-Known Member
Witty offered this as evidence that the increase in the south east is down to this new variant: A comparison with Yorkshire and the Humber, where cases of the new variant are low and tier 3 has been having an effect, and the SE, where cases of the new variant are higher and tier 3 hasn't worked. From which he concludes that the new strain is so infectious that tier 3 doesn't work.
Isn't this a completely dishonest analysis, since it ignores that the SE has only been in tier 3 for the blink of an eye? And doesn't his resorting to this suggest that there isn't any real evidence for him to point to?
Just wondering.
Isn't this a completely dishonest analysis, since it ignores that the SE has only been in tier 3 for the blink of an eye? And doesn't his resorting to this suggest that there isn't any real evidence for him to point to?
Just wondering.