On the same day, four leading royal colleges and health organisations asked staff to "act immediately" and use alternatives to some "first line" medications in new guidance on changes to specific anaesthetic drugs facing "pandemic pressures".
Dr Ron Daniels, an intensive care consultant in the West Midlands, says his hospital is "running low" on propofol, a commonly used anaesthetic, and alfentanil, an opioid painkiller which is used in intensive care.
This was predicted/expected but its no less horrible to hear about:
Coronavirus: 'Local shortages' of intensive care drugs
Some painkillers and sedative drugs used in intensive care are "a bit stretched", the BBC learns.www.bbc.co.uk
This might have worked at about the point at which those people came back from China on the Horseman coaches, if it had been coupled with other restrictions like full lockdown and proper isolation.Just in practical terms, it's utterly pie in the sky to imagine something like that could work, given the woefully low level of testing. Maybe if far more widespread testing had started a month or so ago, together with earlier moves to practice widespread social distancing etc
And that's before we even get on to the other issues, which probably don't need pointing out to anyone here.
Im in that category tbh. But I doubt my work would be happy about it if everyone else was happy to go back to work with their appsAs an alternative, I suppose people could agree to hole up in their homes if they want to wait for vaccination. I'd even agree with paying them to do so, as I doubt there'd be many takers!
Well that's also my pessimistic reaction...yet apps have been used in east asia, so.... ?? I dont know. I guess its a long time to go till then anyway, maybe not worth getting too far into hypotheticalsThere are myriad other boring technical barriers to this going well but it's fundamentally difficult to see how it can work from a technical perspective.
Most of these have very few cases and strict control measures. It's too late for Western countries unless they manage to magic up universal daily testing.Well that's also my pessimistic reaction...yet apps have been used in east asia, so.... ?? I dont know. I guess its a long time to go till then anyway.
Im in that category tbh. But I doubt my work would be happy about it.
and if thats the choice id rather #1, if Im not happy about the look of #2 . im sceptical about #2 working, but lets seeWhat choice do we actually have though? It's either a very long lockdown until a viable vaccine or phased back to work with test and trace (and probably some level of lockdown).
It's not clear that anyone in this photo is breaching distancing guidelines. Whether those guidelines are sufficient is another matter.
Most of these have very few cases and strict control measures. It's too late for Western countries unless they manage to magic up universal daily testing.
It's not lockdown. Merely voluntary self-isolation.our current form of lockdown
Fuck that.
How so? Can you point to groups of people from different households interacting in ways that could spread infection? I can't.
Yeah, just in case people are in any doubt about my position, I'm not saying it isn't a good idea, I'm saying the whole testing, tracing, tracing, testing cycle should have been started weeks ago.This might have worked at about the point at which those people came back from China on the Horseman coaches, if it had been coupled with other restrictions like full lockdown and proper isolation.
The fundamentals are that there are four ways to do location on modern mobile phones:
GPS only works with line of sight to a sufficient area of sky, so not indoors. Cell tower location is generally much too imprecise to tell you anything other than partial postcode.
- Actual GPS
- Wi-Fi network identification (you know or can crowdsource where a Wi-Fi router is)
- Bluetooth, a bit like Wi-Fi
- Cell tower triangulation
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are potentially promising. However even the very best scenario is weak compared to supposed social distancing guidelines. Wi-Fi location only has high accuracy in carefully designed physical environments (supporting using Google Maps in a shopping centre full of access points), and Bluetooth might tell you more about personal contact but its range is too high.
So you will go to Tesco and you'll be ID'd as having contacts with pretty much everyone in there. Then, a week or two later, when you've got symptoms and self-report, it will alert everyone you were ID'd with in Tesco and everywhere else since, and this will cascade out, and oh look the whole country will be in lockdown.
There are myriad other boring technical barriers to this going well but it's fundamentally difficult to see how it can work from a technical perspective.
I'd look at it in a slightly different way: that the government is still seriously entertaining ideas like this as our apparent future means it neither has a coherent idea of what to do nor is talking to anyone who does.Yeah, just in case people are in any doubt about my position, I'm not saying it isn't a good idea, I'm saying the whole testing, tracing, tracing, testing cycle should have been started weeks ago.
That the government is only now thinking about/preparing to implement this means that far, far more people will have it, and the job of tracing and testing everyone who has been in contact with someone who tests for it, then tracing and testing everyone who has been in contact with them, etc, becomes hugely more difficult than it might have been.
It's not clear that anyone in this photo is breaching distancing guidelines. Whether those guidelines are sufficient is another matter.
I suggest you report them all.
I was thinking more "thin end of the wedge", but yes - I cannot see how this government, with its reputation for tearing up conventions, would ever let go of these wonderful powers, having got them. "Mission creep" is a given with them, and would be the case with this. In spades.DWP will love it, and then 'encourage' its ongoing use
its crossing a rubicon.
It's not lockdown. Merely voluntary self-isolation.
I suggest you report them all.
How dare they be outside, the London dwelling bastards
All I see is a perspective-compressed photo taken with a telephoto lens, making it very difficult to judge separation. If you want to figure it out for yourself you can find the Street View location in Vicky Park and judge how far apart the trees really are.look at the crowds behind the tree's on the left.
All I see is a perspective-compressed photo taken with a telephoto lens, making it very difficult to judge separation. If you want to figure it out for yourself you can find the Street View location in Vicky Park and judge how far apart the trees really are.
View attachment 206272
If you go out in any park and are careful to maintain your distance, you can still end up in one of these shots, which amongst other reasons is why it irritates me.
I'd agree with you on that.I'd look at it in a slightly different way: that the government is still seriously entertaining ideas like this as our apparent future means it neither has a coherent idea of what to do nor is talking to anyone who does.
Reminds me of thisThe most recent figures I can immediately find suggest that over 60,000 people had tested positive on April 9th. Finding and testing even the direct contacts, far less contacts of contacts etc, is a task way beyond not only current testing capability, but our likely capability for the foreseeable future.
No, I'm a keyworker, so I'm going out every day, funnily enough maintaining public green spaces so that people can get out of their homes and use them to exercise.Just wondering, are you in the shielding or at risk group?
btw, there was a gathering next to me as i posted on that thread, didn't report it, but boy am i going ot vent when i get a chance.