elbows
Well-Known Member
So at the moment we have a partial level of hard immunity. We won't have the full effective level (at least) until everyone has had (or at a pinch been offered) both vaccinations.
It temds to be thought of in terms of thresholds, above which the impact of far fewer members of the population being susceptible causes the virus numbers fall into decline as there are not enough remaining growth opportunities. The thresholds are often quite high, but dont need to be close to 100%.
eg:
Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19 - PMC
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated disease, COVID-19, has demonstrated the devastating impact of a novel, infectious pathogen on a susceptible population. Here, we explain the basic ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
If the fraction of susceptible individuals in a population is too few, then the pathogen cannot successfully spread, and its prevalence will decline. The point at which the proportion of susceptible individuals falls below the threshold needed for transmission is known as the herd immunity threshold (Anderson and May, 1985). Above this level of immunity, herd immunity begins to take effect, and susceptible individuals benefit from indirect protection from infection.
Susceptible, infectious and recovered stuff that the paper goes into more detail about are at the heart of most of the modelling we've ever discussed.
With or without lockdowns the shapes are similar, just the timing and scale of them varies. Since with lockdowns etc, we are changing the number of susceptibles in the population by hiding a chunk of the population away from danger, rather than them genuinely not being susceptible due to immunity etc.
Last edited: