Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Commie Bastards have one more success in Nepal!

DrRingDing

'anti-human wanker'
KATHMANDU, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Nepal's army said on Monday one soldier was killed and contact had been lost with 150 troops after fierce fighting with Maoist rebels in the west of the country but the guerrillas said the death toll was much higher.

An unsigned statement from the rebels, fighting to topple the Himalayan kingdom's monarchy and establish communist rule, said 159 soldiers and 26 guerrillas were killed in the gun battle and 50 troops were captured.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DEL47486.htm

They may be doing well with these sort of tactics, but a plan needs to be developed for getting into Kathmandu.
 
_39965274_nepalmaoistsbody1.jpg

Liberal propaganda
 
Gosh, isn't war sooo exciting DoUsAFavour?

Especially when you're far away from it safe in front of your PC, huh?

Phooowwaar!!!

I love this thread, I think I just wet myself.
 
fanta said:
Gosh, isn't war sooo exciting DoUsAFavour?

Especially when you're far away from it safe in front of your PC, huh?

Phooowwaar!!!

I love this thread, I think I just wet myself.

well for a man of your age doing that...i would be at the doctor pronto like...get a nappy then???
 
fanta said:
Gosh, isn't war sooo exciting DoUsAFavour?

Especially when you're far away from it safe in front of your PC, huh?

Phooowwaar!!!

I love this thread, I think I just wet myself.

That wasn't piss, fanta.

I think you just had your first wargasm. :p :p
 
WAR!

What is it good for?

Posting keyboard-warrior threads full of bullshit about a situation you know fuck all about safely out of any actual harm's way in front of your PC like a brave little soldier...

...say it again...
 
cemertyone said:
They could always impose a blockade again...it was very effective the first time around....
didnt actually get them in to katmandu tho did it?

This is the problem the maoists have, they have no (apparent) idea how to transform their control of the majority of the countryside into control of the actual state. In turn, this is largely because they are Maoists and dont really have any idea of the centrality of the working-class as a class in and for itself.

Have they done any work on really winning over the workers? Raised any demands that would benefit the workers as workers? Talked to them about their demands even?
 
belboid said:
didnt actually get them in to katmandu tho did it?

This is the problem the maoists have, they have no (apparent) idea how to transform their control of the majority of the countryside into control of the actual state. In turn, this is largely because they are Maoists and dont really have any idea of the centrality of the working-class as a class in and for itself.

Have they done any work on really winning over the workers? Raised any demands that would benefit the workers as workers? Talked to them about their demands even?
They've blown a few of them up on buses. Does that count?
 
you're a sad little shit fanta. you're not funny, clever, or interesting. your posts are very tedious repeats of every other post you've ever made.

fuck off.
 
energy said:
Great stuff. Lot's of dead humans in the name of ideology. Definately wonderful news. :rolleyes:
lots of humans were dying anyway under the reactionary regime of the Nepalese monarchy. Pretending they weren't, and/or attacking what is, sadly, the only effective opposition to that reactionary state, as you and fanta are doing, only goes to help the monarchy. hope you're happy with that.
 
belboid said:
lots of humans were dying anyway under the reactionary regime of the Nepalese monarchy. Pretending they weren't, and/or attacking what is, sadly, the only effective opposition to that reactionary state, as you and fanta are doing, only goes to help the monarchy. hope you're happy with that.

Oh we're not attcking any 'opposition' against and 'reactionary regime'. :(

We're just puncturing the smug complacency of bell-ends like you and DUAF and dismissing the rhetorical buzzard-shit you get a hard on from posting about violence you probably know fuck all about and are certainly not threatened from. :)

And, happily, the fact you're this rattled means we're touching a nerve. :D












You silly wanker. :cool:
 
belboid said:
Pretending they weren't, and/or attacking what is, sadly, the only effective opposition to that reactionary state, as you and fanta are doing, only goes to help the monarchy. hope you're happy with that.


I was attacking the glee that DoUsAFavour expressed over the deaths of hundreds of human beings.

It is extremely disingenious to claim this means I support the Nepalese regime. :mad: :mad:

And as I understand it, the Maoist rebels are not above committing massacres themselves.

Why anyone should take sides in such a conflict is beyond me.
 
belboid said:
didnt actually get them in to katmandu tho did it?

This is the problem the maoists have, they have no (apparent) idea how to transform their control of the majority of the countryside into control of the actual state. In turn, this is largely because they are Maoists and dont really have any idea of the centrality of the working-class as a class in and for itself.

Have they done any work on really winning over the workers? Raised any demands that would benefit the workers as workers? Talked to them about their demands even?

Well i would disagree..but ain`t got the time on the p.c to argue differently...but will come back...
 
energy said:
I was attacking the glee that DoUsAFavour expressed over the deaths of hundreds of human beings.

It is extremely disingenious to claim this means I support the Nepalese regime. :mad: :mad:

And as I understand it, the Maoist rebels are not above committing massacres themselves.

Why anyone should take sides in such a conflict is beyond me.
the last line being key here, i think. in effect by 'not taking sides' you do effectively back the dominant/existing force. Obviously I'm glad to hear you don't actively wish to do so, but as there is, currently, no alternative opposition except the maoists, then what can one do? & the maoists dont (generally) make random attacks on the populatoin at large (unlike the Nepalese army), they attack the armed forces of that country. I'm sure the members of that force didn't sign up entirely willingly, and their deaths are more wasted lives, but responsibility for their deaths lies with the reactionary regime, imo. It's not a pleasant common room discussion over there, its life and death.

cemerty - i'd be very interested to hear/read owt you know of that imply the guerilla's DO have a plan for the cities, when you have the time.
 
blimey, you've never heard of 'newspapers'! noticed something called 'the bbc'?

In which case something like the International Nepal Solidarity Network would be way beyond you.
 
ffs, fanta. Whilst I can see your point about DUAF's tone, Belboid has done nothing but defend the right of the Nepalese to rise up against the monarchy. Unless you're a pacifist I fail to see the problem.
 
belboid said:
blimey, you've never heard of 'newspapers'! noticed something called 'the bbc'?

In which case something like the International Nepal Solidarity Network would be way beyond you.

Don't get all coy belboid.

Post up those, no doubt, erudite and informed articles that you've studied and which have given you such an insight to the current conflict in Nepal.

We're waiting. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom