Did you listen to the second half of hte Compulsion one - that's the half where he really heats up. He's incredible. There's a sort of cult like following around him, but by some seriously clever people too in the philosophy world - he's rose to a giant in philosophy. There are some simple key concepts in his work - that we have, since the 80s, moved from external-punishment, to internal ones. that we have moved from "Must" to "Can" and that "can" exhausts the human, cuts him off, makes him believe that he is just a atomised dot floating around making right and wrong decisions - forget society. He takes the modern internal monologue, to an almost comphrehensive degree, stretching out to love, ambition, fear, dread, hopelessness, and links it so effortlessly to neoliberalism, and, as a kind of angry reaction, the solution he proposes is a kind of powerful nihilism. A retreat by way of Heidegger and Zen buddhism. A refusal of compulsive achievement, whether it be in the realm of politics, progress, sex, relationships. The power of negative thinking. Instead of I can, I can't. Because, well, we quite often can't. A giving up. And then seeing what happens.
The problem for him is not the disciplined, controlled subject (foucoult) but the modern (largely-absent-behind-a load of well-being, theraputic language) but the neoliberal "achievement subject", never ever settled, never drifting in peace, constantly harrased by the master-slave dialectic that is now internalised, often from teh moment we wake to when we sleep. His books are a guidebook in walking in the complete opposite way of capitalism and neoliberalsim. He sees social media as 'capture' of the subject. that there are no real spaces left for emotional and mental experience and processing, even simple thinking, even simple contemplation, both slowly vanishing. that we flit from one distraction to the other, compulsively - hyper attention. To think through something., to be alone and untinterupted with ones thoughts. He uses heideggers "humans are held by thought" for this, and that we should be extemely careful of highly addictive, attention-capturing capitalist machines like tic tok, and the like. if they are not used as tools, they will, and do, use us as tools. there's little free about compulsively doing one thing over. The doom scroll in this regard is fascinating - a sort of search without aim, search without meaning, a shallow and compulsive fix that rarely satisfises, that now is such a massive part of human capitalist consumption.
i'm a total fan boy, i have to admit. each book removes so many veils. people have described his works as more helpful than a 100 self help books, that's why i have had some rants on this thread. people might read him and find him useful - i did.