friendofdorothy
Solidarity against neoliberalism!
Who is Peter?Let peter met his friends and stay with them for weeks on end in isolation with only back issues of the mail and tinned tuna
Who is Peter?Let peter met his friends and stay with them for weeks on end in isolation with only back issues of the mail and tinned tuna
Peter Hichens and his anti-social Mail article above.Who is Peter?
Thanks.I'm really sorry for your loss Wilf. Really sorry you couldn't see your mum at the end, that sounds extremely hard for both of you. Greebo was such a wise and calming presence on these boards and it's heartwarming to hear she is still having a good influence now.
I wish you fortitude to get through your grief. x
I'd never thought as hope as a discipline before, so this seems like a interesting way of looking at things.TOLENTINO: It has decreased my interest in improving institutions from the inside, and it has drastically altered my sense of the possible rate of change.
My Manifesto
UK needs a new greener more self-sufficient and sustainable economy.
Stop the benchmarking of ‘growth’ and profit as the only measures of success – it’s unsustainable and someone somewhere is paying for those ‘profits’. Reframe our thinking - people are not just workers or units of consumption – we are human beings. We are using up the earths resources and robbing them from future generations and destroying our planet.
- Grow more food.
- Make stuff
- Less stuff
- Decentralise
- Sustainable Energy
- Buildings and homes
- Work life balance
- Education
- Freedom.
Stop the benchmarking of ‘growth’ and profit as the only measures of success – it’s unsustainable and someone somewhere is paying for those ‘profits’. Reframe our thinking - people are not just workers or units of consumption – we are human beings. We are using up the earths resources and robbing them from future generations and destroying our planet.
One thing I'd put in a manifesto would be reusing and repurposing material. Often recycling just the passive putting paper or plastic etc in a bin, but more active measures need to be taken. If you had this already in mind, pls ignore.I've made a start on my own manifesto, I've written 2 pages so far. Not sure I'll publish the whole thing here as Urbs do tend to rip stuff to shreads and I'm not ready for that yet. This is the intro so far and the subject headings.
I've made a start on my own manifesto, I've written 2 pages so far. Not sure I'll publish the whole thing here as Urbs do tend to rip stuff to shreads and I'm not ready for that yet. This is the intro so far and the subject headings.
I was thinking more about manufacturers and national legislation - not the action of the individual end users. Companies should be forced to make and sell things with recycling in mind and be resposible for paying towards the cost of recyclying or ultimate disposal. Its only economic to make disposable things out of plastic if companies are not responsible for the costs of disposal. Lots of things could be recycled right now but are routinely just thrown away instead. In general ideas of reduce, reuse, recycle, needs to be adopted at every stage of production, distribution, use and disposal. Why is it cheaper to buy new rather than mend? how is it possible to buy a dress for a few quid? because the people who make it are not paid properly and who is paying to put it landfill when its been worn only once or twice? That was more the sort of thing I had in mind.One thing I'd put in a manifesto would be reusing and repurposing material. Often recycling just the passive putting paper or plastic etc in a bin, but more active measures need to be taken. If you had this already in mind, pls ignore.
Tighter dole regimes after the introduction of the JSA meant that being a full time activist was no longer an option, this coupled with the rocketing cost of being a student has taken away the two main ways of funding a life of activism.
I was thinking more about manufacturers and national legislation - not the action of the individual end users. Companies should be forced to make and sell things with recycling in mind and be resposible for paying towards the cost of recyclying or ultimate disposal. Its only economic to make disposable things out of plastic if companies are not responsible for the costs of disposal. Lots of things could be recycled right now but are routinely just thrown away instead. In general ideas of reduce, reuse, recycle, needs to be adopted at every stage of production, distribution, use and disposal. Why is it cheaper to buy new rather than mend? how is it possible to buy a dress for a few quid? because the people who make it are not paid properly and who is paying to put it landfill when its been worn only once or twice? That was more the sort of thing I had in mind.
It's a common neoliberal trick to shift responsiblity from the rich large companies to the individual end users. eg Obesity has nothing to do with the many food corps spending millions filling shops with cheap sugary products, no, its just your own fault if you get fat etc. Its in the interest of capitalists to sell us shit and keep us unhappy then sell us something with the lure of possible happiness or invent a problem and sell us the solution.
I'd like to shift the enphasis.
Edited to add: feel free to write your own manifesto
May I humbly suggest adding a bit about requiring products to be repairable. I've replaced products that were fixable if I could crack the case, but it required a special tool used only by the manufacturer. Sometimes all that was required was replacing a battery, but I had to buy a whole new product rather than fixing one that I liked just fine.
This is my personal manifesto, mostly to get all my swirling thoughts out of my confused head and onto paper, so I can focus and be calmer.Why is it cheaper to buy new rather than mend?
TUESDAY 8TH SEPTEMBER 18:00 - 19:30PM
Can't catch the livestream and feeling the FOMO? Don't worry! Join us for a watch-party the following week.
Sign up for the watch-party.
Redirect Notice
Watch-party: The Advocacy Academy Class of 2021 Campaign Launch
Turning to hope
Hope is an alternative to resilience. Hope is the capacity to identify meaningful goals, the steps necessary to attain them and the motivation to take these steps. The difference between hope and resilience is that, where resilience is conceptualised as a return to a normal state of functioning following a stressful event or situation, hope is based on the idea of reaching a goal.
Teachers can introduce this idea of hope into the classroom by sharing some of their hopes and vulnerabilities with their students. By doing this, a teacher can model how they identify and plan to reach goals, while also speaking honestly about fear and uncertainty in the presence of COVID-19.
These fears and vulnerabilities can have a paralysing effect and may mean temporary demotivation or even letting go of long treasured goals. Giving up specific goals should not lead to hopelessness. Instead it can provide an occasion to reflect on other goals more easily realisable during a global pandemic.
At the political level, a commitment to prioritising hope over resilience may mean that governments work towards providing a realistic vision of what life might be like after the pandemic. At the community level, sustaining hope might depend on policy makers, employers and teachers recognising that goals may have to change.
Some of us may not bounce back to our pre-COVID selves and our goals may reflect this change. Yet, if we can help each other to hang onto a bit of hope in the face of this adversity, we may have all the resources we will need to find meaning in the post-COVID world.
That was a great article, interesting and thought-provoking. Thanksfound this article interesting:
Hope is the antidote to helplessness. Here’s how to cultivate it | Psyche Ideas
If hopelessness is learned, then it can be unlearned: how groundbreaking studies paved the way to help cultivate hopepsyche.co