elbows
Well-Known Member
How does that make it particularly clear? Using phrases like "personal computing devices" suggests that it's for consumers, not corporations.
What do you think PC stands for?
How does that make it particularly clear? Using phrases like "personal computing devices" suggests that it's for consumers, not corporations.
Plaid Cymru.What do you think PC stands for?
reliance on (ie trust in) corporations. Leaving aside issues of privacy, copyright, ownership and control of information and metadata, and how that is monetised, there's still the fundamental consideration of what happens when they go bust, get taken over or simply decide to withdraw or reorientate their offering. You're at their mercy, which seems a very odd arrangement to enter into voluntarily.I'm sure it would be very easy to maintain. I'm very impressed with the what can be delivered when you strip away the bloat and deliver a decent experience at a low price, but am I alone though in worrying about having a machine that is so reliant on the "cloud"
Pretty sure Google won't be going bust any time soon, and what are these issues of privacy, copyright, and ownership when it comes to personal, private material stored in the cloud?reliance on (ie trust in) corporations. Leaving aside issues of privacy, copyright, ownership and control of information and metadata, and how that is monetised, there's still the fundamental consideration of what happens when they go bust, get taken over or simply decide to withdraw or reorientate their offering. You're at their mercy, which seems a very odd arrangement to enter into voluntarily.
outsell MacBooks five to one
As a MBP man I thought the OP was a bit like comparing apples to oranges. HOWEVER, I'd be dead keen to know how these chrome-books stand the test of time, if they continue offer sustainable/reliable net access at an affordable cost then good on them.I bet a chromebook only lasts a year or two until its so slow its unusable.
It looks like you're singularly failing to understand how Chromebooks work. They don't slow down over time. That's the whole concept.I bet a chromebook only lasts a year or two until its so slow its unusable.
*runs before the bunfight starts.
I was taking the mickIt looks like you're singularly failing to understand how Chromebooks work. They don't slow down over time. That's the whole concept.
After 20 years of PCs being common place, is slowdown because your daft enough to click yes on everything that wants to install itself still happening much to anyone but the old or mentally feeble?
After 20 years of PCs being common place, is slowdown because your daft enough to click yes on everything that wants to install itself still happening much to anyone but the old or mentally feeble?
All of these complaints aside, I was able to cover the majority of CES with the Chromebook 11. I had one full cheat day on Monday, because I need Windows or OS X to run our image uploading tools for liveblogs and I didn't want to carry two laptops around all day.
Even the biggest sticking point—importing and manipulating images—could have been circumvented in part with a card reader dongle (or better yet, a Haswell Chromebook with an SD card slot integrated).
Even during the few times when I was without a reliable Internet connection throughout the show, Google's apps and the Outlook Web App's offline modes are robust enough that I could still get things done.
I didn't have problems with battery life, or with opening documents or files aside from the image and video problems mentioned above. It was better than working with a tablet or smartphone because it's got a real keyboard and because WordPress hates mobile browsers.
Did I prefer using a Chromebook to using my regular tools? No, not really. Is it possible to do and come back home with your sanity intact? Sure! That's probably something we couldn't have said 12 or 18 months ago, and it's why Chrome OS is so interesting—it doesn't do everything a PC can do, but Chromebooks do enough of what a PC does that they can pose a credible threat to low-end laptops. And in case you hadn't noticed, that's where a lot of the volume of the PC market comes from these days.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014...a-chromebook-wasnt-great-but-it-was-possible/
Have Google said what the support life of any of these devices is?
It shouldn't be difficult to support them for a very long time as long as they restrict what manufacturers can put in them, given that's it's just Linux underneath.
I did look round but can't find anything from Google giving support lifetimes. Given Google's propensity for closing things down (Wave, Reader, Knol, Buzz, Health, Talk, iGoogle, Notebook, Answers etc) that might worry some people, particularly those responsible for supporting devices for business, but those were all services rather than end-user software.
Given the price of a Chromebook, if they do what you need they're a bargain.
In 5 years, when we're all on 100Mbps 5G networks and everything is presented as HTML5 augmented reality, the older machines with ARM CPUs will probably struggle, but for the price you'll be able to throw it away and buy a new faster one.
I played with Chromium OS on a Dell netbook but as of April 2013 it was barely functional and the Dell-sourced image was very poor. No updates available for it either.
Doesn't Adriod still support flash?
Meaning there 'is' life in the old dog 'flash' after all?
Care to list all the major ones they've supposedly "dumped without a second thought " in the last six months?That's more than a small risk, Google are sadly dumping product lines without a second thought these days.
Google dumped it from their own products the Nexus 7 I believe...horrible tech, buggy as shot and kills battery.
Google Reader, GUI Builder, Google Building Maker, Google Checkout and iGoogle have all closed or had their closure announced since 1st June 2013.
I only ever used 3 out of those 5.