I'm not getting my information from newspaper reports... Never mind, this thread is a mess so I'm opting out for now.
I'm not getting my information from newspaper reports... Never mind, this thread is a mess so I'm opting out for now.
Are you trying to be funny? It’s not the time or the place. Surely you know that.
Chris Kaba was a rapper with the 67 Drill group, which is anyway a loose conglomeration of people, not one static set of people. The Drill group is associated with the gang and vice versa, but they are not the same thing, they’re not the same people.
I got it from his own social media, he posted when he got outWhere are you getting it from?
Presumably you mean from local people? Are you implying that you knew him or his friends?
Do you mean you’re not looking at the media at all?
I‘m also getting some chat from non media sources but I’m not relying on that as factual. It’s underpinning some of my reactions and opinions but I’m not quoting any of it,
Since you seem to be saying that you have an ear on the street, you are obviously aware that the gang 67 and the music makers associated with them are not the same people. The people running county lines and using guns etc are not the ones actively making music and putting their faces on YouTube. Of course there are connections but it’s stupid to assume or to imply they’re the same as each other.
Chris Kaba was a rapper with the 67 Drill group, which is anyway a loose conglomeration of people, not one static set of people. The Drill group is associated with the gang and vice versa, but they are not the same thing, they’re not the same people.
Link please.I got it from his own social media, he posted when he got out
Fuck me you're a shit and no mistakeanother fallen gang member and professional criminal. live by the sword...
You can say that, yesCan I say that it is entirely possible for the police to be completey in the wrong when they shoot an unarmed black man and for that man to be a piece of shit.
I don't know the truth of either in this case, but I'm happy to accept both can be true, some people seem to think it can only be one or the other.
I got it from his own social media, he posted when he got out
I mean if you're somehow disputing that then I don't really know where to go. You seem to have made your mind up without knowing lots of basic details. I'm out.
I mean if you're somehow disputing that then I don't really know where to go. You seem to have made your mind up without knowing lots of basic details. I'm out.
I'm not sure you were ever inI mean if you're somehow disputing that then I don't really know where to go. You seem to have made your mind up without knowing lots of basic details. I'm out.
Seems like it may well have been a targeted killing to me. Just one shot. Could be that the police very much wanted Chris Kaba dead for reasons which may never be entirely clear.
I'm hoping you can adduce some proper evidence that he was using the car as a weapon when he was killedHe was armed with a vehicle. Plenty of people on here claim the drivers of "death machines" get off lightly.
If he'd been sprayed with bullets no doubt people would be saying it was a targeted killing because otherwise they would only have shot him as much as necessary.
The way it is supposed to work with policing shooting people is that they check after each shot whether the deadly threat has been eliminated, and if it has then they stop firing.
If you're going to object to being quoted or mentioned I don't think urban's quite the place for youYeah because I said that
Please stop quoting and mentioning me. I'd rather not block you.
I'm hoping you can adduce some proper evidence that he was using the car as a weapon when he was killed
So let me get this right. You're saying that because he was driving a 'death machine' he deserved to die. Is that right? Jean Charles De Menezes was shot 7 times at close range by 2 firearms officers, this on the other hand would appear to have been very clinical so your claim that 'the way it is supposed to work with policing shooting people' falls over right there.He was armed with a vehicle. Plenty of people on here claim the drivers of "death machines" get off lightly.
If he'd been sprayed with bullets no doubt people would be saying it was a targeted killing because otherwise they would only have shot him as much as necessary.
The way it is supposed to work with policing shooting people is that they check after each shot whether the deadly threat has been eliminated, and if it has then they stop firing.
You did say it, I quoted itI didn't say that, blame the saved drafts function
I know the police have form for smearing their murder victims to make it look like their cold blooded murder was justified / necessary, with damage done / objective achieved by the time their stories have been proven to be lies.What do you think happened, then? Talk me through it, as you seem sure the police were in the wrong.
Spoiler alertI know the police have form for smearing their murder victims to make it look like their cold blooded murder was justified / necessary, with damage done / objective achieved by the time their stories have been proven to be lies.
We will see if anything happened differently this time.
So let me get this right. You're saying that because he was driving a 'death machine' he deserved to die. Is that right? Jean Charles De Menezes was shot 7 times at close range by 2 firearms officers, this on the other hand would appear to have been very clinical so your claim that 'the way it is supposed to work with policing shooting people' falls over right there.